<?xml version="1.0"?>
<content collectionGUID="8CD64A8C-901F-4F2B-AC9B-EE9BA9973EEC">
  <lastEdited clientType="local-build-20110701" date="2011-07-01 13:24:32 +0100"/>
  <textBox id="generic-header-attribute" dynamic="no" visible="yes">
    <richText>ripple effect</richText>
  </textBox>
  <textBox id="generic-title-attributes" dynamic="no" visible="yes">
    <richText>shaping low-carbon communities (the pre-mix)</richText>
  </textBox>
  <textBox id="generic-datefield-attributes" dynamic="no" visible="yes">
    <richText>Friday, 1 July 2011</richText>
  </textBox>
  <image id="generic-picture-attributes" dynamic="no" visible="yes" src="1_shaping_low-carbon_communities_%28the_pre-mix%29_files/shapeimage_1.png" left="0px" top="0px" width="464px" height="379px"/>
  <textBox id="generic-body-attributes" dynamic="no" visible="yes">
    <richText>Next week, SOLACE will be publishing its latest Foundation Imprint on climate change. This will include a chapter of mine which focuses on consumption-based metrics and carbon budgets. It&#x2019;s more intuitive, more fun and more of an opportunity for local government than you might think.&#xD;&#xD;The thing is, all the contributors first wrote their chapters a year ago. So when publication was back on, a lot of time had passed, and I made plenty of amendments, to include the most up-to-date thinking and approaches. This meant that, regrettably, I removed a section that I really wanted to see the light of day, particularly the diagram that Ian Christie and I worked on together to help decision-makers get a clear perspective on carbon, and help them take a broader perspective. So here it is, instead:&#xD;&#xD;&#x201C;It pays to go back to first principles to see what emissions targets really mean for a local authority, because it makes us raise our sights from the processes that were put in place to enable authorities to respond to the demands of the UK Low Carbon Transition Plan and the previous government&#x2019;s performance framework. I have often argued that local government needs to avoid treating climate change as &#x2018;just another agenda&#x2019;, on a par with the dozens of other agendas we work on. There are a number of reasons why this is important, not least the consequences of failure.&#xD;&#xD;One approach that can help raise members&#x2019; and officers&#x2019; sights &#x2013; and help establish a place-based understanding - is to visualise the emissions in the authority area. This can be done in a number of ways; the diagram below shows one way, focusing on responsibility. It seeks to outline who is responsible for the emissions in the locality. For the sake of readability, it exaggerates the size of the council&#x2019;s own emissions and those of public sector partners: typically, an authority will be directly responsible for 1-2% of emissions and the total impact of the local state (including what it procures) is a little over 10%. So Zone B in the diagram represents nearly 90% of emissions.&#xD;&#xD;Emissions in a place: who&#x2019;s responsible?</richText>
  </textBox>
</content>
