Newspaper Articles

Teenage Mutant Ninja Eisenhauers: Part 2

Wed, 23 Dec 2009 02:00:36 -0500

By Don Nicoloff

December 21, 2009

(Continued from Part 1)

Dwight D. Eisenhower’s 1924 arrival at Ellis Island
Returning from a 2-year deployment in the Panama Canal Zone as a major in the U.S. Army, Eisenhower was accompanied by his wife, Mamie and their 2-year-old son, John Sheldon, born August 3, 1922 in first, “Hennen, Colorado.” [The reader is reminded that the original manifest listed two passengers on lines 18 and 19 with the surname, “Hennen.”] John Sheldon Eisenhower was likely born at Cristóbal, Panama Canal Zone. His birthplace was later changed to “Denver, CO” in official biographies.

It is also possible that Dwight Eisenhower was born with a different name. We are told that he was given the name “David Dwight Eisenhower” at birth and that he legally interchanged his first and middle names while at West Point, calling himself “Dwight David.” In the military, a name change is a big deal, but we are expected to accept that a legendary account is plausible, or that the lack of any birth documentation in Denison or Tyler, TX (anywhere in the U.S. for that matter) is a totally excusable non-issue. The U.S. Army and U.S. government knew more about Eisenhower’s true identity and origins, and they should both be held accountable, even 98 years later.

The published pedigree of Dwight D. Eisenhower is disprovable upon his September 27, 1924 Ellis Island clam to have been born in Tyler, Texas. Since he claimed to have been born on October 14, 1890, he would have been age 33 on that date, not “34,” as he also stated. It is significant that 28 years prior to his run for the U.S. presidency, Eisenhower knew that he was either born in Tyler, TX, Denison, TX, or elsewhere. Consider that his being born in Denison, TX is also a lie. Now why would anyone lie about where they were born? Was it equally possible that he was actually born on a date other than the one he stated and that he simply stated his true age? We might also consider that these statements were made by a higher authority, either inside or outside of the U.S. Army.

Unlike most ship manifests, the S.S. Cristobal’s passenger list was typewritten, as if it had been prepared for expedited presentation upon arrival. The major’s address was “c/o Adj. General, Washington, D.C.,” while Mamies’s and John’s was “750 Lafayette St., Denver, CO,” alleged to be the address of her parents. if the U.S. Army prepared this typewritten passenger list, then they certainly knew where Eisenhower was born — at least they knew in 1924. [In hindsight, it is obvious that this written document slipped through the cracks, never having been mentioned until discovered during my research. It could very well be that Eisenhower was told to say “Tyler, TX” if anyone should ask.]

The unintended consequences of creating an un-American ‘hero’
Upon then-General Dwight D. Eisenhower’s June 1, 1952 return to Washington, D.C., having fulfilled his duties as Supreme Commander of NATO, he immediately entered the presidential race as the lead candidate for the Republican Party. Eisenhower formally launched his campaign in a speech given at Abilene, KS, on June 4, 1952. On June 15th, he established temporary campaign headquarters at the Brown Palace Hotel in Denver, CO. From July 5-11, 1952 he attended the Republican National Convention, where he received the party’s nomination to run for the presidency. His campaign headquarters were moved from Denver to New York City’s Commodore Hotel on August 24, 1952.

At some point, likely between June 4 and August 24, 1952, a New York law firm is alleged to have questioned officials in Grayson County, TX to learn if Eisenhower had a birth certificate on file in either Denison or in the county recorder’s office. It was learned that there was no certificate on file, so a former U.S. Army private, Lonnie F. Roberts, age 41, took it upon himself to spearhead the acquisition of a certificate. The likelihood of such an event occurring as described by an unnamed Denison newspaper is preposterous. It is probable that Roberts worked for Army intelligence, who would have, nevertheless, assisted in getting the job done on Eisenhower’s behalf. [See “Eisenhower 1952 Birth-Certificate Fraud Revealed,” Don Nicoloff / Direct Light Productions.]
http://web.me.com/donnicoloff/directlightproductions.com/Articles/Entries/2009/11/29_Entry_1.html

Most political biographies are written to ‘inform’ the public about a candidate’s qualifications prior to his/her campaign. Dwight D. Eisenhower profited from the publicity he received from the media, both during and after WWII, so not much was written about him beforehand. A five-month campaign afforded little opportunity for anyone to look deeper into his background. Robert Taft (R-Ohio) was involved in a mud-slinging scandal pertaining to Southern votes, so the public’s attention was on those issues.

Two Texas newspaper articles about Eisenhower’s birth certificate went unnoticed by most Americans, and the issue died a sudden death, ling before it had the opportunity to ‘grow legs’. The Republican Party was likely aware of the potential threat to their handpicked candidate’s dilemma and made certain the story and issue were immediately quashed. Judge J. N. Dickson was probably left with little choice but to legalize an otherwise illegal act. Other than the newspaper stories’ claims, we do not know if a birth certificate was ever issued, let alone the constitutionally-required Certificate of Live Birth. The matter was dropped, and thus began the legend that “Dwight David Eisenhower” was born in Denison, Texas. But, he was not. “David Dwight Eisenhower” should have been the name on the Certificate of Live Birth, if there ever was one produced. This minute detail is routinely overlooked by public officials, historians, and biographers alike.

A lot of money has been invested in creating and maintaining Dwight D. Eisenhower’s historical birthplace home in Denison, TX. Tourists annually flock to pay their respects to a great American hero and former U.S. president, while teachers, students, historians, and everyday Americans revel in the illusion that they have been given an up-close taste of real history. How disappointed they will be, along with the town that profits from the increased tourism, to learn that Eisenhower, by his own account (or the U.S. Army’s), was not born there.

[As in the cases of George H. Scherff, Jr. (aka George Herbert Walker Bush), John McCann, II (aka John Sidney McCain, III), and Barry Rockefeller (aka Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. / Barry Soetoro) — all ‘made men‘ — the facts attributed to Dwight D. Eisenhower’s American birth do not add up. Since we cannot reliably consider his birthplace to be accurate, how can we rely upon the genealogical/biographical data which supports such a false clam? We cannot.]

Some Eisenhauer ninjas arrive at Ellis Island
The Eisenhower name is a phonetic transcription for “Eisenhauer,” of German origin but equally utilized by those of Jewish and other persuasions. The name is a conjunction of two words, “eisen,” which means “iron,” and “hauer,” which means “face worker,” or “a miner who works at the uppermost surface of the mine.” “Eisenhauer” could be construed to mean ‘hardcore data miner’ (or ‘spy’) in a modern sense. [The original Japanese translation for “ninja” is ‘spy’. ~ Author]

Karl Eisenhauer, a 34-year-old “joiner” from Offenbach, Germany arrived at Ellis Island on June 26, 1903. According to the information on line 3 of the S.S. Patricia’s passenger manifest, he was on his way from hamburg to visit his friend, “U. König,” who lived at “450 E. 185th St., New York, N.Y.” Who was Karl Eisenhauer? Was there a clue imbedded within the passenger list? If so, it was well hidden. The INS agent’s German cursive style, on of the soppiest I have ever seen, did not make it any easier to read the names.

On first glance at line 4, I overlooked the surname and assumed that “Pauline,” 43, and the six children who followed were accompanied by Karl Eisenhauer. I thought that I had found the proverbial ‘needle-in-the-haystack’, but that conclusion was premature. Pauline’s ‘calling or occupation’ entry read “wife.” She and her six children were “Germans” from “Offenson, Germany,” and not Offenbach. There are three towns called “Offensen” in Europe, but none are spelled “Offenson.” I sensed that there was something unusual about this entry — and the accompanying story.

Paulines ‘final destination’ column had the words, “husband,” “Wilhelm Heck,” “Fostoria, Ohio,” and “glas fabrik” (German for “glass factory”). Was this the break I had been looking for? not if I could determine there had been a Wilhelm Heck who actually lived and worked in Fostoria, Ohio. I presumed that the factory mentioned was the Fostoria Glass Company, so I embarked upon a most probable dead end in this aspect of the investigation.

There is no current phone listing or address for the Fostoria Glass Company in Ohio, but before giving up, I searched for any information I could find. To my surprise, Portland’s “Rain of Glass” members Carole Bess White and Dennis Headrick posted a feature article on their web site, “Glass Factories On Postcards.”
http://www.thewebfooters.com/html/Glass%20Factories.pdf Aside from being a reminiscent look into the art of glass making and its history, on page 4, there is a reference to the Fostoria Glass Company. Mrs. White wrote:

“The Fostoria Glass Company was founded in 1887 in Fostoria, Ohio. They made clear pressed glass and oil-burning lamps from the simplest to the fanciest, including painted “Gone With the Wind” lamps. The fuel supply ran out in Fostoria, so the plant was moved to Moundsville, West Virginia in 1891.”

While in Moundsville, W. VA where natural gas was more plentiful, the Fostoria Glass Company became the largest glass manufacturer in the U.S. The company closed its doors in 1896 due to an “inability to compete with foreign manufacturers.”

The last half of the final sentence in the previous quotation indicated that my first assumption was correct. how could a wife travel some 5,000 miles with her six children to meet her husband where he lives and works, not knowing that the factory had moved to another state 12 years earlier? The abnormality was significant.

Carefully examining the entire passenger list, a recognizable pattern appeared. The majority of the passengers were Germans from Austria, Hungary, and Germany, including a few Poles and Norwegians. I suspected that karl Eisenhauer’s claim to be from Offenbach and Pauline Heck’s to be from Offensen were more than coincidental. Investigating the genealogies of the Heck children produced no results. Emma, Wilhelm, Andreas, Franz, Anna, and Karl Heck were all untraceable. Not one was born within the specific timeframe dictated by Pauline Heck’s statements, and none were born to parents “Wilhelm and Pauline Heck.” So who were these “Hecks” who had arrived at Ellis Island? They were future “Eisenhowers,” and names given to INS officials were aliases. What the heck@

As will be recognized below, the names of the Heck children were taken directly from an Eisenhauer lineage originally from Eastern Europe. The assertion that the family was of German origin was intended to confound and misdirect, another Hegelian dialectical ploy. Since the future roles of these children was of a subversive nature, great care was taken to hide the links to their specific bloodline. The INS agents at Ellis Island were easily bribed to overlook insufficient or forged documentation and did so upon the Hecks’ arrival. Such practices are evident in the illegibility of the agent’s handwriting, which is, in such cases, invariably German longhand.

Wilhelm Heck, U-boat ‘passenger’
Wilhelm Heck first came to the U.S. on the S.S. Bark Argonaut, which sailed from Bremen, Germany to the Port of New York on November 9, 1867. Wilhelm, age 2, was traveling with his brother Heinrich, age 13. Wilhelm, according to this record, was born in 1865. It is not known if Heinrich legally became a naturalized U.S. citizen as there are no official records to support that claim.

Whether it is true that Wilhelm Heck actually worked for the Fostoria Glass Company is irrelevant. What is provable is that he returned to Ellis Island on more than one occasion. Is is likely that Wilhelm heck was not residing or working anywhere in the U.S. when Pauline Heck sad she was joining her husband in Ohio, accompanied by her six children. She would have been born in 1860.

Wilhelm heck’s name was on line 6 of the S.S. Bremen passenger manifest on September 22, 1903. Though the list is entitled “LIST OR MANIFEST OF ALIEN PASSENGERS FOR THE U.S. IMMIGRATION OFFICER AT PORT OF ARRIVAL,” Heck is listed as “USC” (U.S. citizen). His last residence lists no address but reads:
“Sworn” (in at) “Philadelphia” (final destination. It is extremely suspicious that six U.S. citizens were all included in the above list. Why were Heck and five other passengers included on the alien passenger list if they were Americans? This information also conflicts with that provided three months earlier by Pauline Heck on June 26, 1903. [See above.]

On November 26, 1907, Wilhelm Heck, age 37, [false age] arrived on the S.S. Grosser Kurfürst sailing from Bremen, Germany. Heck again declared his nationality as “USC.” However, under the “Calling or Occupation” column, there was no vocation written — only a handwritten number, “11-320104-7/30/41-no cha” (no change), which was obviously added at a later date by someone else. This series of numbers represents several details not previously know to this author. Why would the INS have hidden Heck’s passport number if he had one?

I considered that Wilhelm Heck may have been part of the secret German U-boat fleet stationed near Montauk, Long Island as a parking lot during WWII. Witnesses have described the nightly surfacing of German submarines as “resembling a forest of iron floating as far as the could see.” U.S. infiltration by Nazi and Communist spies prior to, during, and after both world wars was financed and promoted by the international central banks in New York, London, Paris, Berlin, and Holland. The Zionist international military/industrial complex was merely the financial mechanism to bring about conditions for the massive plundering of the world’s wealth, just as it is today. Facilitating the infiltration of agents working for this banking cabal was masked under the guise of ‘immigration’.

From the numerical code that replaced Heck’s “Calling or Occupation” field, I deduced that the “11-320” represented the Homberg Building at MIT in Cambridge, MA, the 104 might represent “10/4” or “October 4,” (1926) [Heck, Wilhelm 4.10.26 Offenbach am Main], the day he joined the Nazi Party and received his Gau Hesson-Nassau ‘Gold Party Badge’. The “505” was his U-boat designation, though Wilhelm “Willi” Heck was also assigned to U-397, U-2516, and U-2529 U-boat (submarine) crews. The date, “7/30/41” could well have signified his date of deployment to one of four crews (above). [See http://www.ubootwaffe.net/crews/crews.cgi?uquery=1:boatnum=397 ]

William (Wilhelm) and Pauline Heck made another trip to America on September 30, 1912 on their return to Tiffin, Ohio. On this occasion, they stated that they were both “age 50.” Wilhelm should have been 47 years old and Pauline, 52, based upon her 1903 declaration. How they could have gotten their ages wrong is beyond explanation, unless one considers their identities and data to be totally fraudulent. Both stated that they were naturalized citizens at the Tiffin, Ohio Court of Common Pleas on September 2, 1908. The statement cannot be true, considering the 1903 and 1907 claims (by Wilhelm) that he was already a U.S. citizen. The address in Tiffin was “2nd Ave. [&] 161 St. Such an intersection in Tiffin, Ohio never existed then — and does not today.

Karl Eisenhauer: The bloodline’s namesake
A genealogical search for “Karl Eisenhauer” produced a total of four Karl Eisenhauers, all born well after 1869, the year our Ellis Island passenger would have been born, had he been truthful about who he really was. Note that this Karl spelled his first name with a “K.” There existed others who spelled their name with a “C,” though they must be excluded because of the aforementioned passenger manifest entries.

On the basis of the investigative ‘dead ends’ encountered, I decided to rely on my intuition until I could establish a genuine genealogical path. My forensic research, couple with intuition, was how I discovered the original Karl Eisenhauer lead. Finding the numerous anomalies confirmed my convictions that I had found the possible ‘progenitor’ of the Eisenhower clan. I also considered that Karl was little more than an official surrogate, likely born in Solka, Bukovina, Austria-Hungary. I deduced that this finding might lead me to the Eisenhauer’s true bloodline. The key to recognizing this is routinely found in the first and middle names of the average garden-variety infiltrator. The ancestors of the bloodline religiously employ this ritualistic method.

Since Karl Eisenhauer was not an American, and his birthdate, pedigree, and origin were (at this point) unknown, the only way to possibly track him would be via a photograph — one that identified him by name. The odds of finding such a photo are staggering, but one was found. It so happened that a genealogical web site in the United Kingdom had two Eisenhauer relatives who were attempting to identify several unknown subjects in an old wedding photo. The photo is likely the single-most important piece of evidence in this entire investigation.

The first subject identified was “Karl Eisenhauer,” the name by which the family knew him. The married couple seated front row, center were Elisabeth Ann Eisenhauer and Johann Peter Sauer, two names I had already encountered in my research. To their left was an unnamed woman who piqued my interest. Was she related to Karl Eisenhauer? My intuition said she was. If I was wrong about this branch of the Eisenhauer family, the matter would be concluded in short order. If I was right, I had discovered the pathway to the Eisenhauer bloodline, and my work would have just begun.

[The reader will find it interesting to know that Elisabeth Eisenhauer was the grandmother of the photo’s contributor. With more information, on might then determine if Karl was Elisabeth’s father. Parents traditionally sit next to the bride and groom in wedding photos, so the unidentified woman seated next to the groom would most likely be Karl’s wife and Elisabeth’s mother. Her maiden name could only be known after the mystery of Karl’s true name was solved. The existence of a genuine genealogical document remained a possibility. As anticipated, the relatives’ ancestral information provided a few clues, though I had also determined that they had been given aliases and false birthplaces as a substitute for their ancestors’ real names and true origins. the obfuscation was deep.]

Below is an original blog thead entitled “Karl Eisenhauer” [verbatim]:
http://boards.ancestry.co.uk/surnames.eisenhauer/164/mb.ashx

“my grandmother’s mother’s maiden name was Emma Eisenhower. Emma’s father’s name was
Karl Eisenhauer, and his parents were Adam and Eva. I’m trying to find out where president
Eisenhower comes into my family history, becuase I know he is some how. I have a lot more
information on the Eisenhauers, such as Elizabeth Eisenhauer, Maria Eisenhauer, Peter
Eisenhauer; and other’s by the name of Johann Eisenhauer who was unmarried and deaf, Jacob
Eisenhauer and wife Eva...and much more. Maybe I can be a help to anyone who has any
questions, but for me...I’m just trying to find out how i’m related to President Eisenhauer. If
anyone can help me, I would appreciate it@”

Here is the reply to the original blog thread:

“Karl Eisenhauer came to USA aboard the ‘Patricia’ in 1903.
he was b. 9-Nov-1868, d. ca 1940, NYC. m. _____ Schulmerisch.

[The intended spelling was “Schulmerich,” i.e. George Schulmerich. ~ Author]

“The attached photo shows Karl Eisenhauer (seated, middle row, left) to his left is my
grandmother Elisabeth Eisenhauer, and to her left is my grandfather Johann Peter Sauer. The
others in the photo are unknown. Could one be your gr-grandmother?”

The photo identifying Karl and Elisabeth Eisenhauer (below) was attached to the blog thread reply:

Photo 4-A

The reader should consider that even today’s closest Eisenhauer relatives were left in the dark regarding the identities of the subjects within the photo. How can anyone determine the names of relatives they have never seen, especially when the information passed down through generations, is intentionally obfuscated with disinformation and half-truths? It becomes clear that a tremendously powerful and influential individual had devised this scheme, and he was not about to reveal key elements of a plan to infiltrate a foreign country with a member of his own bloodline. After all, the ultimate goal was to rule that country from afar by placing a member of his bloodline at the helm, first through its military hierarchy and later, from its highest political office.

Where have we seen that face before?
The woman sitting opposite Karl Eisenhauer (beside the groom) looks strikingly similar to photos we have seen of “Ida Elizabeth Stover,” the proclaimed mother of Dwight D. Eisenhower. In fact, the photos purported to represent Stover were photos taken of this woman during her youth. The woman’s name? Barbara Zurowski. No photos were ever published where she was identified by her real name. It is doubtful that even her friends and a few close relatives knew that her image had been used in biographies, history books, and in TV documentaries in the U.S. to portray a woman who never existed, but was called “the mother of the 34th U.S. president.”

Photo 4-B

The above photo (4-B) is alleged to represent “David J. Eisenhower” and “Ida Elizabeth Stover” sometime during their lives, although no time frame has been established as to when the photograph was taken. We do not know if this photo represents their courtship or their marriage, but those details do not even matter. Neither person existed in real life, so the photo has to be fraudulent on that basis alone.

Photo 4-B is reminiscent of a modern-day cartoon. The contrast has been manipulated to obscure the artificial composition of the subjects. Simply compare the length of “David’s right-hand fingers to his left-hand fingers, and you will see that the hands and finger do not match, the left hand being larger, which is most visible when comparing the fingers.

Why don’t these people ever look into the camera lens or at the photographer when posing for a photograph? The simple answer is that there was no photographer, and there was no photograph, at least not outside of a photo lab or computer. We have also seen photographic examples of events that preceded the American Civil War, and those photos were consistently clear and even exquisitely detailed.

Zooming in on the images in Photo 4-B (unlike Photo 4-A) reveals a black, then a white line that follows the entire outline of “David’s” body. It is most visible, even without enlarging, on the right side of his body, from his collar down to his coat, and then up again. His hairline and ears also reveal a thick black line around the perimeter. The backdrop image was manipulated to compensate for this anomaly, but was apparently done in a hurried manner. Publishing the photo at a low pixel rate reduced the visibility of this gross deception.

“Ida’s” dress, being lighter than “David’s” coat, was surrounded with a black line. That is why the backdrop has been changed to black on the right side of the photo. The part in “Ida’s” hair is extremely wide, as if she has a vertical bald spot running from the front to the back of her head. This photo is nothing more than a poorly produced, amateurish compilation, where the subjects purported to have been photographed did not even exist. [See Photos 4-C and 4-D below.]

Photo 4-C

Photo 4-C is a cropped version of “David Jacob Eisenhower’s” image in Photo 4-B. The contrast and exposure have been adjusted to reveal details of his coat, hair, and other aspects of his visage. Though the outer portion of his right ear is illuminated by the light, the right side of his throat is unnaturally shadowed. His face appears to have been ‘drawn’ along the jaw line, and his hair looks like it was painted.

There are many other anomalies within this cropped version of Photo 4-B. You can find many of then yourself if you think ‘outside the box’. The black lines in between the fingers should serve as a starting point.

Photo 4-D

As in Photo 4-C, the photo at right is a cropped version, the contrast and exposure having been adjusted to reveal portions that have been masked to hide its fraudulent nature.

Starting at the top of “Ida’s” head, we can see that her hair appears to have been painted on, and the gap which serves as a part in her hair appears to be at least an inch wide. One sees a solid mass of color but no strands of hair whatsoever.

Following the entire outline of her head, neck, and body, we can see a thick black line drawn to cause her image to blend into the backdrop, which, itself, has been darkened in order to hide the fraudulent features. Even the photo’s background has been manipulated on the right edge, again, to hide the thick black line along her left arm. Not only is the pose unnatural, it suggests a ‘candid’ shot was taken. “Ida’s” collar resembles an Austro-Hungarian Army jacket, although that might have been a slight coincidence. Again, there are many other anomalies for you to find.

Photo 4-E

There is a strong resemblance between the image purported to be “Ida Stover” and the woman in Photo 4-E, Barbara Zurowski.

The ‘photos’ used to portray “Ida Stover” were actually two photos of Zurowski when she was much younger. The doctoring of those photos is quite evident, though one can see some features which are similar.

The genealogical evidence pointed to Zurowski as the mother of the children who became the Eisenhowers, and as I studied the various photos, it became clear that Stover’s image had been doctored in every representation of her likeness.

It was upon the discovery of Photo 4-A (above) that I noticed the similarity between the various images. I then began to understand the need to doctor the ‘Stover’ photos.

For purposes of comparison, a crop of “Ida Stover” is found below Photo 4-E. The photo, you may recall, was part of the Eisenhower family photo in Part I of this article.

Photo 4-F

At right is a cropped image of Barbara Zurowski, who had secretly played the photographic role of “Ida E. Stover,” mother of Dwight D. Eisenhower in the Americanized version of the story.

Unlike the other photographic images which border on being caricatures in a comic book. Photo 4-F is a crop made from Photo 1-B in Part 1 of this article.

In this photo, we can see the subject has real hair which is actually close in color and texture to that of the subject in Photo 4-E.

The bridge of the nose is equally wide, her eyes are far apart, and even the eyelids match. Foremost are the shape of the mouth, lips, and chin.

We are looking at a much younger version of Barbara Zurowski, so we must also account for aging, increased weight, etc.

Certainly, this image debunks the recent claim that Dwight Eisenhower had Negro blood in his ancestral background. “Ida Stover” was nothing more than a legend.

Photo 4-G

This cropped image of “David J. Eisenhower,” taken from the family photo compilation in Photo 1-B (in Part 1 of this investigative analysis), is actually the image of one Josef Eisenhauer, brother to “Karl” seen in Photo 4-A.

Also note the unusual way his left eye is closed, as if to create the illusion of action when the shutter was snapped by the photographer. This image of a younger Josef Eisenhauer was compiled into the colorized version of the family photo.

Note where his hair is parted, which is not accurately portrayed in Photo 4-C (above). Although the handlebar mustache is longer in this photo, the image below will reveal the source of the one at left.

The dialectical legend of the Eisenhower clan was constructed upon a foundation of doctored photos. You can decide for yourself if a man with no valid image borrowed his brother’s, just so he could travel about as a spy without anyone ever suspecting who he really was.

Photo 4-H

At left is a crop extracted from the wedding image in Photo 4-A.

The photos representing “David Jacob Eisenhower” were not his own youthful likeness, but that of the tall man standing behind the bride, Josef Eisenhower, the brother of Karl Eisenhauer.

We are obviously looking at an older man, yet he is still sporting a mustache, and his hair is still parted in the same location as is seen in the doctored “David Eisenhower” photos found in the many presidential biographies.

Considering the amount of photo manipulation in the Eisenhower family photo album, this previously unseen image of the original Eisenhauers from Europe bears a striking similarity to the photos published in biographies.

The odds of finding this photo are staggering, yet here its is.

Confused? You should be, for that was the intention of the scheme’s mastermind. We were not supposed to be able to connect the genealogical dots, but we have.

I had determined that the information I found about Karl Eisenhauer was not accurate for several reasons explained above. Genealogical searches only proved that my conclusions were correct. His true identity was hidden behind a missing or changed first name. Searching for Elisabeth Eisenhauer’s parents equally produced no results, so I now had two confirmations that he was not using his real (or full) name, and that the identities of both parents were not available on the basis of standard genealogical databases. I wondered what the source of Karl’s birthdate information was, though I considered it inaccurate. That one date in 1868 was known (but not one “circa 1940”) was indicative of obfuscation, a common occurrence where espionage and infiltration are involved.

The multi-faceted Eisenhauer clan: A royal family of spies
While traveling on ships from Germany, France, and England, Karl Eisenhauer claimed he was from Offenbach. Most Germans refer to that city as “Offenbach am Main.” However, there are no birth records in Germany for a Karl Eisenhauer born in the 1860’s or anytime in the 19th century. The myth that he was a German is attributed to the fictitious passenger records he created while traveling from port to port. Eisenhauer (Eisenhower) relatives consider the information found in passenger ship records to be representative of his true origin on that basis alone.

Since Karl Eisenhauer was not born in Germany, there existed no family pedigree or credible way to trace his ‘German’ ancestry. So where and when was he born? Why is there no record of his birth, including the names of his parents? We can determine the answers to these questions after first examining the various aliases he used. Note that all three aliases indicate ages quoted to U.S. Customs officials are not deemed to be accurate, based upon a preponderance of evidence that Karl Eisenhauer was much older than he stated. Lack of specific documentation indicates complicity by the INS agent who examined his passport or other papers. All claims of German and U.S. citizenship are fraudulent. For clarification, I will first indicate the chronological order of his various trips to the U.S., including his aliases. Note that with one exception, he is listed on the first-class page of each passenger manifest, a right reserved for a privileged few.

Ship Date Name Age Occupation Country/City of Origin Destination
Bark Argonaut 9NOV1867 Wilhelm Heck 2 None Germany None declared
Werkendam 03SEP1896 Franz Eisenhauer 26 Blacksmith U.S.C. U.S.
Patricia 09JUL1903 Karl Eisenhauer 34 Joiner Offenbach, Ger. N.Y.C.
Bremen 22SEP1903 Wilhellm Heck None None U.S.C. Philadelphia
La Savoie 16JUN1906 W R Eisenhower 30 None U.S.A. Philadelphia
Grosser Kurfürst 26NOV1907 Wilhelm Heck 37 None/505 U.S.C. None
President Lincoln 30SEP1912 Wilhelm Heck 50 None Sworn/Tiffin, OH 1908 Tiffin, OH
France 30MAY1913 Wm R Eisenhower 40 None U.S., Philadelphia Philadelphia, PA
Orca 27APR1923 Wm R Eisenhower 51 None U.S., Philadelphia Philadelphia, PA

It is obvious that Karl Eisenhauer was afforded a special dispensation upon each and every arrival to the United States, whether he used his real name or one of several aliases. Karl Eisenhauer was not his full name though. As will be seen shortly, it was Franz (Karl) Eisenhauer. The significance of the Wilhelm Heck alias pertained to his secret military function with the German Navy. The “505” (under occupation) referred to his position on a German U-505 submarine (U-boat). The “11-320” designation referred to the Homberg Building at MIT in Cambridge, MA. Several other passengers on the SS. Grosser Kurfürst had similar occupational designations and no U.S. passport numbers. Heck and those passengers were all listed as “U.S. citizens.”

Using his real name in 1896, Franz (Karl) Eisenhauer likely arrived to coordinate plans for the relocation of his family when he returned as a ‘single‘ male on July 9, 1903. On that occasion, the next passenger on the list was Pauline Heck (aka Barbara Zurowski), who traveled with their six children to meet her husband, Wilhelm Heck, in Fostoria, Ohio, despite the glass factory where he supposedly worked had moved to Moundsville, W.VA 12 years earlier. She was traveling withe the same man but used his alias to hide the fact that they were really Eisenhauers. Her children also had partial or full aliases.

Finally, returning to the U.S. in 1906, the “Eisenhower” name was established. Upon each and every arrival at Ellis Island, whether using Franz or Karl Eisenhauer, Wilhelm or William Heck, or William R. Eisenhower as his name, his age differed from that previously established, sometimes as many as 10 years. In all cases, the domicile could not be relied upon because the addresses were non-existent. note that the Eisenhower claim to have been “born in Texas and living in Kansas” was not mentioned by any of these infiltrators, even as late as 1923.

Pauline Heck employed the same method of obfuscation, never having declared her native country nor her possible marriage to Franz Karl Eisenhauer. When the bloodline is finally revealed, the passenger records and aliases will make sense. INS agents, having already been bribed and compromised, entered the information they were told to enter into the passenger manifests, whether the data was accurate or not. In the case of the Eisenhauers, required information was routinely omitted from the manifests despite requirements to complete all the fields in each manifest. This practice facilitated infiltration by spies and foreign confederates working on behalf of their Illuminati masters.

Below are the passenger records of Barbara Zurowski Eisenhauer (aka Pauline Heck and Mrs. William R. Eisenhower):

Ship Date Name Age Occupation Country/City of Origin Destination
Patricia 09JUL1903 Pauline Heck 43 Wife Offensen Fostoria, OH
President Lincoln 30SEP1912 Pauline Heck 50 None Sworn/Tiffin, OH 1908 Tiffin, OH
France 30MAY1913 Mrs WR Eisenhower 40 None U.S., Philadelphia Philadelphia, PA
Orca 27APR1923 Carrie M Eisenhower 50 None U.S., Philadelphia Philadelphia, PA

The connection to Franz Eisenhauer lies within the information available upon the birth and marriage of his secret ‘daughter’, Elisabeth. We may recall that aliases are routinely used to hide links to the true bloodline, so the name of Elisabeth’s husband, too, is likely an alias.

As seen in the wedding photo (above), Elisabeth Eisenhauer was married to “Johann Peter Sauer” [the name provided by relatives] on November 24, 1881 at Arbora, Solka, Bukovina, Austria-Hungary. The “Sauer” and “Hauer” names were encountered during my preliminary research, and I was then convinced they might also have been aliases. They wer. [See Zurowski-Eisenhauer ancestry below.]

A single ancestral record for “Elisabetha Eisenhauer” (born on April 1, 1861 and christened the next day) lists her parents as “Franz Eisenhauer” and “Anna Sauer.” As expected, Franz and Anna had no parents, no birth dates, no place of birth, and must undoubtedly still be alive because there is no record of their deaths. Since her mother’s surname (in this case) was “Sauer,” might we assume Elisabeth married a relative, possibly a brother or cousin? Thinking a bit more ‘outside the box’, I realized that Elisabeth was born 4 years before her father, a fact that disqualified her as Franz’ and Ann’s daughter, that is, if the birth record was legitimate. She must (or would) have been Franz’ sister, cousin, or simply inserted into the family and given the Eisenhauer name. She bore a strong resemblance to the woman sitting next to her husband, so we could rightfully surmise that she would be next in line to carry the bloodline. [See wedding photo above.]

Actually, Franz and “Anna” were not her parents. In all cases, Franz was not the actual father of the children for whom he was credited to have sired. The father was someone much more important — the progenitor and patriarch of the bloodline — who could not risk exposing his long-range plan. Such plans easily spanned several generations, a requirement which served to obfuscate the true bloodline. it was, in fact, a method used by other in Germany, Holland, England, France, italy, Russia, the Ukraine, Romania, Poland, China, Japan, and elsewhere.

While researching the numerous Eisenhauer passenger manifests, I discovered a record for “Frantz Josef Eisenhauer” and determined it might be worth a look. Clicking on the internal Ellis Island link produced a result seldom encountered, but here it was again. I must have strayed into forbidden territory. Here is the passenger manifest for “Frantz Josef Eisenhauer”:

Photo 4-I

The concept of ‘immigration‘ was invented to facilitate the practice of infiltrating foreign empires and governments. Of course, the commoners in those countries were oblivious to the practice and were conditioned to accept the phenomenon as an ordinary consequence of one’s “seeking a better life in a land of opportunity.”

Those who accepted their role as ‘surrogates‘ were well rewarded for their efforts and often given additional ‘assignments‘ in foreign military, political, or espionage organizations. In modern time, they are know as ‘double agents‘ and are also found operating within financial, educational and religious institutions.

Dwight D. Eisenhower was chosen to infiltrate the U.S. Army (in 1924), appointed the Supreme Commander of Allied Forces in Europe (during WWII), the educational system (President of Columbia University, 1948-1961). It was not the first time a similar feat had been accomplished by foreigners. [See “Deathbed Confessions, Photos Support Claim that George H. Scherff was the 41st U.S. President,” Don Nicoloff, Direct Light Productions and The Idaho Observer, (April-June, 2007) and “The Three Stooges go to Washington, Parts 1-7(b),” (April, 2008 - July, 2009 ), Don Nicoloff, Direct Light Productions & The Idaho Observer.]

Adolf Eisenhauer: Alter ego of the 34th President of the United States of America
My initial research, coupled with intuition, revealed the name “Adolf Eisenhauer.” “Could this be the real identity of Dwight D. Eisenhower?” I wondered. Such a conclusion would require a mountain of forensic and/or circumstantial evidence. Thoughts of Adolf (Schikelgruber) Hitler ran through my mind. After all, he was from Austria, and there might have been some hidden, mystical connection between the two.

I had already recognized a pattern of names inspired by royalty, though it would have been premature to conclude that there was an actual bloodline connection without first establishing foundational evidence. There were many synchronicities between the backgrounds of the leading progenitorial candidate and his illegitimate offspring. I was convince, early on, that I knew his name and that of his foremost son. I had established a pattern of obfuscation in the U.S. that directed my attention, over and over, again to the region of Solka, Bukovina, Austria-Hungary — the Austrian Empire prior to WWI.

My genealogical search of that region produced results which were mirrored by someone I now consider to be one of the foremost genealogist on Planet Earth. I was led to a very organized representation of the ancestry of one “Antoni Zurowski,” researched, compiled, and edited by Richard B. Carruthers. The only doubt I have about Mr. Carruther’s work is whether he realizes the historical significance it truly has. Below are the mirrored findings of my own research as presented in part by Richard B. Carruthers:

http://familytreemaker.genealogy.com/users/c/a/r/Richard-B-Carruthers/ODTI-0002.html

4 Barbara Zurowski b 1: 28 November 1867 Deutsch-Satulmare, Bezirk Radautz, Bukovina, Austria-Hungary
b 2: 1867 <, Satulmare, Bukowina, Austria>
b 3: 1867 Deutsch-Satulmare
d 1: 18 August 1921 Solka, Bukovina, Romania
d 2: 18 August 1921 Solka Parish, Dr. Radautz, Bukovina, Austria
Baptism: 8 Dec 1867 Nativity of Mary Roman Catholic parish, Radautz, Bukovina, Austrian
Empire

+Franz Eisenhauer b 1: 20 September 1865 Solka, Bezirk, Suczawa, Bukovina, Austrian Empire
b 2: 1865 <Solka Parish, Kr. Radautz, Bukowina, Austria>
d: 29 October 1941 - October 1949 Bärn, Germany
m: 2 February 1890 Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary Roman Catholic parish, Radautz,
Bezirk Radautz, Bukovina, Austria-Hungary

5 Male Eisenhauer

5 Leontine Eisenhauer
(aka: Leonticia) b 1: 1891
b 2: 1891 <Solka Parish, Kr. Radautz, Bukowina, Austria>
d 1: 12 October 1895 Solka, Bezirk Suczawa, Bukovina, Austria-Hungary
d 2: 12 October 1895 Solka Parish, Kr. Radautz, Bukowina, Austria
d 3: 1896

5 Adolf Eisenhauer b 1: 8 June 1892 Solka, Bezirk Suczawa, Bukovina, Austria-Hungary
b 2: 8 June 1892 Solka Parish, Kr. Radautz, Bukowina, Austria
d: 5 January 1957 Potsdam, Germany

+Ida Koch b: 13 October 1895 Arbora, Bukovina, Austria-Hungary
d: 7 November 1966 Sedin, near Berlin, Germany
m: 21 May 1916 Solka, Bezirk Zuczawa, Bukovina, Austria-Hungary

5 Eugen Eisenhauer b 1: 23 September 1893 Solka, Bezirk, Suczawa, Bukovina, Austria-Hungary
b 2: 23 September 1893 Solka Parish, Kr. Radautz, Bukowina, Austria
b 3: 1896
d: 1914 - 1918 Cause of death: killed in action in World War I

5 Johann Eisenhauer b 1: 19 January 1895 Solka, Bezirk Suczawa, Bukovina, Austria-Hungary
b 2: 1894
b 3: 19 January 1895 Solka Parish, Kr. Radautz, Bukowina, Austria
d: 1914 - 1918 Cause of death: killed in action in World War I

5 [9] Frank Hauer
(aka: né Franz Eisenhauer)

b 1: 7 August 1897 Solka, Bezirk Suczawa, Bukovina, Austria-Hungary
b 2: 1897
b 3: 7 August 1897 Solka Parish, Kr. Radautz, Bukowina, Austria
d: 6 June 1976 Windsor, N. county, Ontario, Canada, The Commonwealth

+Elisabeth Zehaczek m: Bef. 1924 Bukovina, Romania
*2nd Wife of [9] Frank Hauer
+Katharina Kelsch aka: Katie
b: 23 May 1913 Govan, Sakatchewan, Canada, British Empire
d: 25 May 1988 Windsor, N. county, Ontario, Canada, The Commonwealth
m: Aft. 1924
Father: Josef kelsch Mother: Emma Beck Kelsch

5 [10] Emil Eisenhauer b 1: 9 July 1899 Solka, Bezirk Suczawa, Bukovina, Austria-Hungary
b 2: 9 July 1899 Solka Parish, Kr. Radautz, Bukowina, Austria
d: 15 September 1977

+Maria Nomen Nescio
*2nd Wife of [10] Emil Eisenhaur
+Elvira Petcu b: 28 November 1896
d: 28 December 1964
m: 24 June 1924

5 Leon Eisenhauer
(aka: Leo) b 1: 14 February 1902 Solka, Bezirk Suczawa, Bukovina, Austria-Hungary
b 2: 1902
d: Postsdam, Germany

+Emma Sauer d: Ferch, near Berlin, Germany
m: 1927

5 Olga Maria Eisenhauer b 1: 19 August 1904 Solka, Bezirk suczawa, Bukovina, Austria-Hungary
b 2: 1904
d: 23 January 1984 Erfurt, Germany

+Alois Mück
(aka: Alojsius Mueck) b 1: 8 June 1897
b 2: <Solka Parish, Kr. Radautz, Bukowina, Austria>
m: 17 February 1925 Solka, Bukovina, Romania

5 Gisele Eisenhauer
(aka: Gisela) b 1: 12 January 1906 Solka, Bezirk Suczawa, Bulovina, Austria-Hungary
b 2: 1906

+Karl Snizek b: 3 April 1907 Radautz, Bezirk Radautz, Bulovina, Austria-Hungary
m: 29 October 1941 Neutomischel
Divorce: 1954

As illustrated above, the family of Barbara Zurowski is portrayed in a chronological sequence which includes multiple birth dates, multiple death dates, and their accompanying locations. Ancestral records are often by-products of family legends passed down from one generation to the next. The records are often the result of intentional obfuscation as well.

The reader will note that this dimension of the Zurowski family genealogy lacks any reference to Elisabeth Eisenhauer, the central figure in Photo 4-A (above). But that does not disqualify any data regarding the true identities of Dwight and Mamie Eisenhauer. Examining the entry under “Adolf Eisenhauer” reveals some startling information which is more than coincidental.

The birth date, June 8, 1892 places Adolf well within the range of Dwight D. Eisenhower’s birth claim by just over two years. note that there are two locales for his birthplace, both being in Solka, Bukovina, Austria-Hungary. Based on my research findings, I discerned that he was born in location 2, Solka Parish, Kr. (Kreis) Radautz, Bukovina, Austria-Hungary. His death in Potsdam, Germany would have occurred just prior to Eisenhower’s 2nd term in office as the U.S. President, though the death information was added to further obfuscate his true bloodline connection and to mask his identity.

Based upon a 1913-1914 school record found, we should seriously consider that the death of “Johann Eisenhauer” was an attempt at masking the true identity of Adolf Eisenhauer, his elder brother by 2-3 years. The lack of information about Johann is sufficient reason to suspect that the birth/death record was created to discourage further investigation about a missing family member. It would have been easier to claim that he was “killed in the war” than account for his sudden disappearance from Solka, Bukovina. The locals probably did not know him as “Adolf,” so the birth record tends to further obfuscate the true identity of the individual — in this case, Johann Eisenhauer. [See below.]

it is more than coincidental that Adolf Eisenhauer married a woman named “Ida” Koch, who was born on October 13, 1865, one day before the date proclaimed by Dwight D. Eisenhower — October 14. Recall the name of Eisenhower’s alleged mother, Ida Elisabeth Stover. And the marriage between Adolf and Ida occurred on May 21, 1916, just one month and 10 days before the July 1, 1916 wedding proclaimed to have transpired in Denver, CO.

[Both dates correspond to the numerological equivalents of 8+8, yet another hidden synchronicity used in occult Magick. The number “8” represents a strong, material vibration and is often associated with wealth. The planet Saturn rules the number “8” and also represents Satan’s planet in our solar system. Turn the number “8” on its side, and it represents the sign for “infinity.”]

By studying the birth, death, and marriage dates of the Zurowski-Eisenhauer clan, the reader will notice a pattern of duplicate dates from one subject to the next. The significance of the duplicity pertains to the occult design of the ancestral record, not that the record is based upon fact.

Adding insult to injury, the U.S. Department of Transportation/Federal Highway Administration joined in the Eisenhower genealogical ruse with yet another fraudulent account of an Eisenhower’s birthplace. Virtually every ancestral record of Mamie Geneva (Doud) Eisenhower’s birthplace indicates she was “born in Boone, Iowa, “ including the one below:

Mamie Geneva DOUD (AFN: 8QSM-QN)

Sex:
F

Event(s)

Birth:
14 Nov 1896 Boone, Boone, Iowa

Death:
1 Nov 1979 Washington, District of Columbia

Burial: 1979 Eisenhower Mus., Abilene, Dickinson, Ks

Parents:

Father:
John Sheldon DOUD (AFN: FHKK-MT)

Mother:
Elvira M. CORISON (AFN: FHKK-N1)

Marriage(s)

Spouse:
Dwight David “Ike” EISENHOWER (AFN: 8QSM-PH)

Marriage:
1 Jul 1916 Denver, Denver, Co

In light of the above document and the official records available to any U.S. government agency, the commemoration of the “Eisenhower Memorial Bore” was nothing more than a continuation of a massive coverup regarding President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s, and now Mamie Eisenhower’s true Austria-Hungarian origins. The event, which became the focus of a women’s liberation argument, is described on the agency’s “Infrastructure” web page.

http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/infrastructure/bore.cfm

Below are the excerpts from the article which are pertinent to this research:

Eisenhower Memorial Bore

“The Eisenhower Memorial Tunnel in Colorado was originally going to be called the Straight Creek Tunnel, the name stemming from the valley where the west portal is located. However, in September 1969, Governor John Love proposed to rename it after former President Dwight E. Eisenhower, who had died on April 4, 1969. In 1972, the Colorado State Legislature officially designated it the Eisenhower Memorial Bore.

“The name reflected the President’s connections to Colorado. Mamie Eisenhower, the President’s wife, was born and raised in Denver. In fact, the Eisenhowers were married in the gladioli-filled music room of the Douds’ Denver house on July 1, 1916, and were frequent visitors to the State while he was President.

“Governor Love signed a design contract for the 1.6-mile tunnel on February 23, 1966, with Federal Highway Administrator Rex Whitton and Chief Engineer Frank Turner among those in attendance. The signing took place at the Denver Hilton Hotel, site of the American Road Builders Association convention that year. ...

The Opening
“The Eisenhower Memorial Tunnel opened on March 8, 1973, following a ceremony that was held inside the tunnel’s east portal because of the 34-degree temperature and occasional snow flurries. Members of the Eisenhower family had been invited but did not attend. However, Mamie wrote to Governor Love, saying, “How proud Ike would have been with this honor, for he love Denver and Colorado.” ...

For more information, see the Colorado Department of Transportation’s website at:

www.dot.state.co.us/eisenhower/eisenhowerbore.asp

The reader may have noticed a few discrepancies in the first paragraph, namely the reference to Dwight “E.” Eisenhower and the claim that “Mamie Eisenhower, the President’s wife, was born and raised in Denver.” The first reference to a “gladioli-filled music room” is equally obfuscatory, since it has been proven (here) that no such wedding occurred in Denver, CO, as described in ‘official’ biographies.

The Eisenhauer ancestry points in one direction and toward one individual
Who could pull off such a massive undertaking — the infiltration of a nation with agents groomed to play the roles the Eisenhowers played? Enormous sums of cash would have been required to finance the operation, and a fortune would have been invested bribing bankers, U.S. government employees, public officials, universities, politicians, law enforcement, and U.S. Army. Spies have been arrested, tried, and executed for lesser offenses, yet this group of infiltrators was allowed to function with impunity and the complicit assistance of those whose Constitutional duty was to prevent such a thing from ever happening.

It so happened that the one person who could orchestrate such a plot was the ruler of the country where the Eisenhauers were born — Franz Josef I, Emperor of Austria-Hungary. He had the motive, the desire, and the international clout to guarantee him the unimpeded cooperation the plot required.

Franz Josef would not have chosen just anyone for such a mission. He would have been certain that the individuals were from his own bloodline. Would he have sacrificed his own children? In one sense, no, but he would have sacrificed children who were produced outside of wedlock. The method was frequently employed by autocratic rulers throughout history, and Franz Josef was no different. In fact, two of his bastard sons, Franz and Josef were the surrogate ‘patriarchs’ of the Eisenhauer clan.

Photo 5-A

Franz Josef I, Emperor of Austria-Hungary

Photo 5-B

Gen. Dwight David “Ike” Eisenhower

Photo 5-C

The personal Coat of Arms of Franz Josef I,
Emperor of Austria-Hungary

Franz Josef I, Emperor of Austria-Hungary
Franz Josef I von Habsburg (1830-1916) ruled the Austrian Empire for 68 years from December 2, 1848 until his death in 1916. He was the eldest son of Archduke Franz Karl, brother and heir to Ferdinand I, Emperor of Austria. When Franz Karl abdicated his right to the throne, his son, Franz Josef became Emperor. Franz Josef was also the grandson of Holy Roman Emperor Frances II and his wife, Princess Sophie of Bavaria.

The political situation Franz Josef I inherited was one of turmoil and mistrust between nation states near the end of the revolution. A sequence of events that led to the impending decline of the Austrian Empire included Austria’s betrayal of Russia in the Crimean War, the loss of Austrian-controlled territories in the Lombardy and Venetian regions of Italy (which spawned Italian unification), and Austria’s loss in the Austrian-Prussian War in 1866. he was not on the best of terms with a newly-unified Germany which had the support of Turkey, Serbia, Italy, and a few other countries.

At age 13, Franz Josef became a colonel in the Austrian Army, never relinquishing a lesser officer’s uniform throughout his life. Eventually, Franz Josef saw battle at the Italian front before returning to join his family at Innsbruck, Austria where it was considered to be safe.

In America, Franz Josef saw the opportunity to overtake a country that had proven itself to be of military and industrial might, but was basically naive in the area of international affairs. Franz Josef I could not allow news of his plot to infiltrate the government of the United States to reach the ears and eyes of the Viennese, so he often went on hunting and diplomatic excursions in other parts of his kingdom, namely the Bukovina region of the Austrian-Hungarian Empire. His forays into the outlying areas of his kingdom were well-documented and allowed him plenty of leisurely time to stray from his marital vows. His wife, Elisabeth of Bavaria (also his cousin) tolerated and even encouraged his extramarital affair with a mistress, the popular Viennese actress, Katharina Schratt. It is not known if Katharina bore any of Franz Josef’s children, but she received several large estates in appreciation of the relationship she maintained with the Emperor throughout the remainder of his life.

Of his four children (one son, and three daughters), the heir to the Austrian throne was Rudolf, who committed suicide in 1889. That left Franz Ferdinand, the son of Ludwig (Franz Josef’s second younger brother) as the successor to the throne. Two assassinations, one an execution of Franz Josef’s younger brother, Maximillian, by firing squad in Mexico, 1867 (after a 3-year reign as Emperor of Mexico), and a second in June, 1914, the assassination of Franz Ferdinand by a Serbian nationalist, left Karl I, his grand nephew as the sole heir to the throne.

Franz Josef’s brother Karl Ludwig died in 1896 from drinking tainted water while on a religious pilgrimage, and Franz Josef’s wife, Elisabeth was assassinated by an Italian anarchist in 1898.

The 1914 assassination of Franz Ferdinand is considered to be the catalyst that precipitated World War I. it was during this time that one of Franz Josef’s illegitimate sons came of age. The son’s name was Adolf Eisenhauer. A record at Sereth, Romania’s K.K. Franz-Josef Staadtsgymnasium has a student listed in the 1913-1914 school roster, “Johann Adolf Eisenhauer” [aka David Dwight Eisenhower and Dwight D. Eisenhower]. The publication, “I. Jahresbericht des K.K. Franz Josef-Staatsgymnasiums in Sereth / Veröffenlicht am Schlusse des Schuljahres 1906/1907,” K.K. Direktor Anton Paul,” lists class members, on page 20, in attendance at year’s end under the heading, “IV.Klasse A.” http://bukowina.info/FJSereth.pdf

IV. Klasse A.

Arinowicz Abraham Josef, Berger Samuel, Bleiberg Eduard, Brunnwasser Karl, Byk Gerhard Anton, Caba Nikolaus, Carage Ignaz, Costiuc Ambrosius, Eisenhauer Johann Adolf, Engler Marzell, Freier Hirsch, Freuer Jakob, Genici Georg, Goldenberg David, Gauer Oskar, Hehn Karl Martin, Hertanu Zalik Moses, Hollinger Markus, Horowitz Ernst Nataniel, Katz Emanuel, Kaufman Samson, Kieslter Friedrich, Klein Melech, Klocek Taddäus Stanislaus Josef, Knstantynowicz Ewald, Korabiewski Miecislaus Josef.
Privatistin: Citron Debora Rachel.

We now have Adolf Eisenhauer’s full name, “Johann Adolf Eisenhauer,” Proper records were kept in his native land, though his relationship to the man who sired him, Franz Josef I, Emperor of Austria-Hungary had to remain a secret. Who was his mother? It was likely Barbara Zurowski, the woman who had given him more than one child and possibly as many as twelve. Her earlier photographs, though compiled for public consumption, were presented to the American public as legitimate representations of Ida E. Stover, Dwight D. Eisenhower’s mother. In fact, the photos of Ida Stover were really photos of Barbara Zurowski when she was a young girl. Likewise, the photos of David Jacob Eisenhower were photos of a young Josef Eisenhauer, the brother of Franz Karl Eisenhauer.

Franz Josef I was able to recruit surrogates to assist his bloodline in the infiltration of the U.S. government, and those who were in power aided him at every opportunity. Johann Adolf Eisenhauer was chosen for exactly that role, and his name had to be changed in order to obfuscate his true origin. Nevertheless, with the complicity of all the aforementioned personalities, “Dwight D. Eisenhauer” was ushered into the U.S. Army in 1924. he was then able to infiltrate the international hierarchy of the military elite, eventually presiding overt the European Allied Forces and NATO. Of course, Franz Josef would have preferred to have lived to see the final outcome of his plan, especially his illegitimate son presiding over the highest office in the land, the Presidency of the United States of America. The Emperor died on november 21, 1916.

There is a filmed record of former President Theodore Roosevelt’s 1910 visit to Austria-Hungary to meet with Franz Josef I. Teddy Roosevelt would have been the ideal candidate to assist Franz Josef I in fulfilling his long-range plan. Roosevelt had already aided Edward VII in secreting several members of his own bloodline [John McCann, Sr., Albert McCann, and John McCann, II aka John Sidney McCain, III] into the U.S. Navy, using Rossevelt’s United States Lines as the means of ferrying spies and infiltrators from (and through) Great Britain, France, and Germany. [See “The Three Stooges go to Washington, Parts 1 and 2.” Don Nicoloff, Direct Light productions, and The Idaho Observer, 2008]
http://web.me.com/donnicoloff/directlightproductions.com/Articles/Entries/2008/5/20_The_Three_Stooges_go_to_Washington%3A_Part_1_1.html

Many Americans are not aware that Teddy Roosevelt, as Assistant Secretary, controlled the Department of the Navy and simultaneously, the United States Lines shipping company, its ownership hidden behind the name of his son, Kermit. Having been a central figure in the Spanish-American War, the Great White Fleet, and instrumental in the construction of the Panama Canal, Roosevelt would have been the ‘go-to man’ for aid in secreting a family member into the U.S. Army and American politics. It was not the time Roosevelt was involved in such a caper.

Photo 5-D

Former U.S. President Theodore Roosevelt

After leaving the U.S. presidency on March 4, 1909, Roosevelt is alleged to have gone on a number of safaris and expeditions in Africa and elsewhere. A little-known film, “Emperor Francis joseph of Austria Greeted by His People,” surfaced during this research. The film documents a non-official visit to Vienna, Austria (circa April, 1910), though its title is rather misleading. When former President Theodore Roosevelt appeared in the film, he was referred to as simply “T.R.” Roosevelt spent several days with Emperor Franz Josef I, and the visit is virtually ignored by historians and documentary film makers. The film’s producer is “unknown,” though it was probably produced by Roosevelt, himself. [The film is posted below.]

http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?papr:16:./temp/~ammem_M743::_

The purpose of the Roosevelt visit is unknown, although we can surmise it had everything to do with orchestrating the infusion of the Eisenhauer (aka Eisenhower) family into American society. Coincidentally, the first official record of “Dwight David Eisenhower” arriving in the United States was via the Panama Canal Zone on September 27, 1924. Recall his declaration to the INS at Ellis Island that Tyler, TX was his birthplace. That momentous event likely marks the first time Johann Adolf Eisenhauer ever set foot on American soil.

[Roosevelt was the New York City Police Commissioner in 1895 and could have actually been involved in aiding the arrival of Wilhelm heck, who first appeared on the scene, in 1896, at Ellis Island.]

Propaganda: Reliance on the public’s acceptance of disinformation and photographic images
Most people have photos which depict some semblance of a chronological progression throughout their lives. it is not unreasonable to expect to see pictures of one’s childhood since the individual changes rapidly as he/she progresses toward adulthood. Parents and family members like to keep such memorabilia for future generations. Is it any wonder why so many political figures lack childhood photos? Those photos might reveal their true identities, so they are often presented as compilations or doctored in order to hide incriminating evidence.

Yet, in the case of Dwight David Eisenhower, the first photo we are offered depicts him at age 12. The family photo is fraudulent, so we do not even know what he looked like until we see another photo purported to be his high school graduation photo. Again, the data does not add up, so any photograph purporting to represent Abilene, KS is also fraudulent. Is it any wonder, then that he should look different in his photos from West Point, a school he did not attend?

Considering the fraud involving the “Denver” wedding and the many anomalous photos from St. Louis Hall, San Antonio, TX, what can we really rely upon? Our discernment, for starters. Discernment is what produced this research, however incredible it may seem to be. Paying close attention to what was said, what was documented, and what was presented as visual ‘proof’ is what led me, and now you, to the Truth.

The only way to prove that someone was not the person they claimed to be is by disproving accounts about who they were and logically, if possible, who they were not, or that they did not even exist. This can be accomplished by comparing documents, both real and forged, and genuine photographs or artist renderings, as was done before the advent of the photographic camera. One usually has a photo or other graphic representation of oneself which accompanies some part of his/her life. Photographic compilations are to be disqualified, for they are merely misrepresentations of fact, as are color renditions alleged to have been photographed before the technology existed. Adding a name and/or date to a photo does not necessarily validate the name, the date, or the photo.

The art of photo editing has played a role in deceiving the public for many years. We have been conditioned to accept anything we see as fact, which is the key contributing factor behind the success of propaganda as form of mind control. We seldom invest the time, as we have here, to study what we are really seeing. Fortunately, we can also compare documents, or the lack thereof, when determining the reliability of historical accounts and the photos intended to add credibility to them. Still, we must be able to ‘read between the lines’, rather than accept everything we are told at face value.

Conclusions
It is often said that “history is written by the victors.” More than 100 years of ‘history’ has been debunked within this research, so we could rightfully say that “history is debunked by those that hold the flashlights, the magnifying glasses, and the microscopes.” Those are the true ‘victors’.

These revelations are certain to ‘rattle a few cages’ and shake the rotten fruit from the ‘Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil’. What we ultimately do with this information requires a new-found sense of spirit and the indomitable resolve to right this ship called “the United States of America.” We have been systematically infiltrated by foreign agents (infil-traitors) acting on behalf of their Illuminati masters for more than 230 years.

It is time to awaken from our deep slumber and reconnect with our God—the God of all Creation—who made us in HIS image. What else is left unsaid?

© 2009 by Don Nicoloff / Direct Light Productions

directlightproductions.com

Teenage Mutant Ninja Eisenhauers: Part 1

Wed, 23 Dec 2009 01:50:50 -0500

Don Nicoloff

December 21, 2009

It is becoming increasingly evident that our ‘leaders’ are mythical creatures playing roles designed to funnel all wealth into the coffers of their task masters. The illusion of hierarchy and the inevitable loyalty to an invisible cause has duped humanity throughout time. Reliance on historical records is the most ancient trick in the book. We are told where to find those records and given a series of historical accounts (usually in story form) to buttress the argument that because those records and stories exist and match, they must be true. Such are the foundational principles of any Hegelian dialectic.

Convince that Gen. Dwight David Eisenhower narrowly avoided a birth-certificate scandal—one that would have certainly imploded his 1952 bid for the U.S. presidency—I embarked upon my own ‘mission impossible’ to pick up the scent of his ancestral trail. The difficulty inherent in this endeavor involves analysis of the extraordinary amount of deception employed in order to fabricate an ancestral lineage that cannot be easily traced.

Dissecting a trail deliberately laid out to deceive the public often leads one into an abyss of darkness, intrigue, lust, greed, murder, and the insatiable quest for absolute power. The reverence and worship of pharaohs, emperors, kings and queens has seemingly been incorporated into our DNA, and as a result, we fail to see the perennial ruses played out—over and over, again—like an endless tape loop. Not only is history “written by the victors,” it is scripted, long before the parts are to be handed out, rehearsed, and played.

Neither mankind nor its self-appointed rulers are infallible. Blunders are made, and a keen eye can spot them, especially if one has the resourcefulness, patience, determination, and endurance to plough through mountains of disinformation intended to discompose those searching for the Truth.

We should remind ourselves that not just anyone can become the president of a nation. U.S. presidents are ‘made men’, and Eisenhower was no exception. His birth, his domicile, and his career were enshrouded in myth and deception. Worshipping such individuals as ‘heroes’ promotes the insanity of war—the act that justifies the plundering of foreign lands and the wealth of their inhabitants.

Circumstantial evidence has equally convicted or exonerated many who have been charged with a crime. Suppression of real evidence often produces a conviction in a court of law, while the fabrication of false evidence can also achieve the same outcome. Where stealth and deception are prevalent, we are expected to accept whatever information is available as the truth. Questioning the validity of that information is frowned upon, and those who do dare to challenge its veracity are then subjected to character assassination, harassment, or judgment, just three of the many methods used to discourage those who might challenge authority.

As reported in “Eisenhower 1952 Birth-Certificate Fraud Revealed,” Don Nicoloff, Direct Light Productions,
http://web.me.com/donnicoloff/directlightproductions.com/Aricles/Entries/2009/11/29_Entry_1.html, then-Maj. Dwight D. Eisenhower informed an INS agent at Ellis Island that he was 34 years old (he would have been 33) and that he was born in “Tyler, Texas.” Published biographies claim he was born in Denison, Texas, a distance of some 130-164 miles from Tyler, depending on the highway route taken. So why would (or how could) Eisenhower have erred in asserting such a crucial detail? What was he hiding? Simply—the Truth.

The perennial quest to control the affairs of foreign nations from afar requires a coordinated effort among two or more consenting parties. Bribery, threats, blackmail, extortion, and murder are the modus operandi which have guaranteed compliance with the power elite in perpetuity. Such plots are seldom discovered, and when they are, it is often too late to undo the damage. When we understand the evil acts which have occurred (and are actually occurring in realtime today), we can take steps to disempower those who would harbor such evil intentions in the future.

What follows is a compendium of research and forensic analysis of both documented, physical and circumstantial evidence. Though this analysis may not conclusively prove (in the minds of some readers) who fathered “Dwight D. Eisenhower” or his exact place of birth, it will certainly prove that the historical accounts in books, magazines, public records, biographies, documentaries, and theatrical films are predominantly fictional. The lies of the past will be exposed herein, despite the enormous amounts of cash and time expended in order to deceive the public.

To the dismay of many who consider Dwight D. Eisenhower a ‘war hero’, this research, if presented in a jury trial, would produce a conviction. Of course, by today’s standards, such a trial would likely have to be held on another planet.

Infil-traitors: The method of espionage and subversion employed by the ‘secret government’
Proving someone was born on a specific date, time, and place should be a simple, factual matter. The ‘system’ was designed to track each individual from birth to death, specifically because of what is now know, today, as the Uniform Commercial Code. Those whose vital statistics cannot be tracked have either escaped the system )because of the system’s inability to track them) or are considered, for a variety of reasons, to be exempt from it.

Therefore, it is not coincidental that a preponderance of bankers, political figures, industrialists, corporate executives, administrative officials, espionage agents, and others considered to be a part of officialdom are untraceable. A prerequisite in accurately determining one’s ancestral lineage is the ability to verify specific details of one’s birth. Such details are easily catalogued in larger cities and towns, where hospitals and doctors are in abundance. This reality does not guarantee trustworthiness when hospital administrators and doctors can be coerced into creating false records through bribery, blackmail, extortion, or the promise of promotion within their careers. We are expected to trust that documentation—any documentation—is legitimate.

Those born in the remote rural areas of the U.S. often escape the system, their names and birth records often accepted and based upon secondhand accounts, whether true or not. Rural locations and small towns are routinely selected by the secret government for that very reason. After all, who would ever accuse someone born in “Smalltown, America” of lying? Folks in small towns know everybody—and everybody else’s business. The ideal way for one to hide his/her ‘business’ in those towns is by leaving. Moving from one small town to another facilitate the ruse, permitting one to become ‘lost’ in the maze of a big city, which is usually the case. The rural records (or lack thereof) are routinely accepted in larger metropolitan areas, usually because of laziness, apathy, ignorance, or the permissive foreknowledge of the role a particular individual is actually playing. The secret government controls all or the majority of birth records in cities and towns throughout the nation, so one ancestral history can be (and often is) surreptitiously manufactured.

When determining the accuracy of one’s vital statistics, the lack of any documentation serves as the first clue that the individual in question many not be who they claim to be. Secondly, conflicting accounts of their place, date, and time of birth suggests that they are intentionally hiding their true identity. Similar inconsistencies in ancestral records indicate a deeper conspiracy to hide one or more identities, usually spearheaded by those who wield great financial and political power.

We do not create nor require birth records—the system does. Birth records are foundational to how the system operates. The system conveniently overlooks the intentional lack of information so the individual’s identity as an agent of the system may be compromised. Such obfuscation is undertaken from the outset of one’s life, or from the moment the individual embarks upon the system’s (the secret government’s) predetermined mission. Therefore, we cannot rely upon the records or historical/biographical accounts of the system, especially when inconsistencies are discovered and revealed, as will be here.

Biographical accounts of historical figures are usually composed by two types of researchers—professional historians or others who are commissioned (by the system) to foster legendary accounts. Forensic analysis of such accounts often reveals the aforementioned inconsistencies, which tend to invalidate both types of accounts. Written documentation can be compared for purposes of consistency in details, timelines, photographs, public and private records, and historical accounts. Affixing a name or a date to a document or photograph does not make it genuine. Such documents and photos actually serve another purpose and can be used to identify specific conspiratorial fraud. As will be found, Dwight David Eisenhower is not (nor should be) exempt from such scrutiny.

Inversely, historians and biographers, if not intentionally misled, can and do make mistakes, some more significant than others. What can we expect to learn from biographical details which differ dramatically with ‘official accounts’? And what purpose do such contradictions serve? We shall soon find out.

David Dwight Eisenhower: A genealogical nightmare
Allegedly born on October 14, 1890 in Denison, Texas to David Jacob Eisenhower (September 23, 1863—March 16, 1942) and Ida Elizabeth Stover (May 1, 1862 - September 11, 1946). David Dwight Eisenhower spent either the first “6 months,” “one and one-half,” or “two years” in Denison, Texas, before his family “returned to Kansas, resettling in Abilene.” The one-year discrepancy in these three accounts, the first by the East Texas Historical Society, the second by countless official biographers, and the third by a school teacher, casts doubt on the entire story.

We could invest valuable time debunking the entire childhood legend of Dwight David Eisenhower, but that will not be necessary. It is worthwhile to point out that the biographical account of one “Anne Adams, a teacher from Houston, TX and author of secular and Christian books,” in her essay, “Ida Eisenhower: Mother of Dwight D. Eisenhower, “ discloses some rather intimate details of the Eisenhower’s time in Denison, TX and of Dwight’s mother, Ida Elizabeth Stover Eisenhower. http://www.historyswomen.com/amazingmoms/Ida.html Ms. Adams
recounts how Ida, raised by her maternal grandparents after her parents died, was discouraged from attending school, but somehow managed to “memorize 1,365 Bible verses within a six-month period,” thereafter winning a competition.

After running away from home at age 16, Ida “moved to Staunton, Virginia to do domestic work in exchange for room and board and take advantage of the opportunity to continue her high school education.” There was no mention of Ida ever having attended school prior to her “continuing her high school education.” Ida is alleged to have “graduated from high school at age 19.” She then “taught for two years” before attending college, but both the high school she attended and what she “taught” remain unnamed. This dimension of the Ida Elizabeth Stover story is not supported by one verifiable fact.

The Adams article details a modest inheritance that Ida Stover’s father bequeathed to her and his six sons upon his death, to be received “when they turned 21” years of age. Ida invested the money by purchasing a piano “which would remain a lifelong treasure.” We were not told if Ida could even play her piano—just that she treasured it.

Ms Adams then described some unnamed relatives who move to LeCompton, Kansas so Ida could attend Lane University, a school founded by her Mennonite church, the Brethren in Christ Church. Lane University is where Ida is alleged to have met David Jacob Eisenhower, who, according to Ms. Adams’ math, was “16 months” junior to Ida. Actually, he would have been 17 months and 3 weeks younger. [Let us hope Ms. Adams does not teach math.]

The couple “were married in the college chapel on September 23, 1885.” The article established that “David’s father [Jacob Frederick Eisenhauer, aka Eisenhower] was a prosperous local farmer and was anxious to support the young couple, so as he had done with his other children, he gave them a sizable grant of cash and a farm. Yet David was not interested in agriculture and instead established a retail store in Hope. When his business failed to thrive, he brought in a partner who took off with their funds, and sent the young couple into deep debt.” [The reader is asked to note the previous sentence which has two misplaced commas. The article appears to be an intelligence agency gaffe. Intelligence agents tend to have the worst grammar on the planet. Let us hope “Ms. Adams” does not teach English grammar, either.]

Mis. Adams continued, ... “The lawyer who was brought in to settle accounts took all they owned except Ida’s piano. this left the young Eisenhower with aversions—to lawyers and to further debt. They already had one son, and Ida was expecting another baby, but the only work David could find was as a mechanic on the railroad. However, it meant moving to Denison, Texas and there on October 14, 1890 their third son was born. He was named David Dwight, but they switched the order of the names to avoid a mix-up with the father. However, two years late the Eisenhowers moved to Abilene, Kansas where David went to work in a creamery operated by a brother-in-law. There Dwight and his brothers would grow up and Ida and David remain.”

These and other details within the article sound warm and fuzzy, but none of them are true. Void of fact, they cannot even be considered to be remotely plausible, especially the explanation for the name change. Millions of fathers have name at least one of their sons after themselves. Ms. Adams failed to read Dwight’s ‘official’ biography, which states that he changed his name while attending West Point Military Academy in 1911. Her account of David Jacob’s job as a “mechanic” contradicts official claims that he was a “wiper”—one who washed locomotives for the railroad company.

‘Professional’ genealogists join in the hoax
An 1880 U.S. Centennial Census record listed at familysearch.org show an “Ida E. Stover” living at the home of one “Peter E. Houff,” her alleged uncle. The census place, Middle River, Augusta, Virginia is not the location where Peter Eiler Houff was born, lived, and died according to his birth records in the same web site database. Houff’s birthplace and domicile at the time of death was alleged to have been Mt. Sidney, VA. One record totally disputes the other on that basis alone, so both, at this stage of the investigation, are likely fabrications to mislead us.

Ida E. STOVER

Female

Other Information:

Birth Year
<1862>

Birthplace
VA

Age
18

Occupation
At Home

Marital Status
S <single>

Race
W <White>

Head of Household
Peter E. HOUFF

Relation
Niece

Father’s Birthplace
VA

Mother’s Birthplace
VA

Source Information:

Census Place
Middle River, Augusta, Virginia

Family History Library Film
1255355

NA Film Number
T9-1355

Page Number
372C

As you can see, Ida’s occupation is listed as “At Home,” whatever that means. The reference to “doing domestic work for room and board” (discussed above) was not mentioned during her census interview. Mr. Houff’s individual record indicated that he was “Widowed.”

Peter E. HOUFF

Male

Other Information:

Birth Year
<1821>

Birthplace
VA

Age
59

Occupation
Farmer

Marital Status
W <Widowed>

Race
W <White>

Head of Household
Peter E. HOUFF

Relation
Self

Father’s Birthplace
PA

Mother’s Birthplace
VA

Source Information:

Census Place
Middle River, Augusta, Virginia

Family History Library Film
1255355

NA Film Number
T9-1355

Page Number
372C

There were also two of Houff’s six children supposedly living in the household at the time of the census, Charlotte Virginia Houff, 34, and Walter Link Houff, 22. Charlotte Virginia Houff was listed as “housekeeper,” again casting doubt on the claim that Ida was actually performing any tasks in exchange for room and board.

Below is the ‘family record’ for Peter Eiler Houff and Rebecca Link, the alleged aunt of Ida E. Stover:

Husband: Peter Eiler Houff

Birth:
19 DEC 1820, Augusta, Virginia
Christening:

Marriage: 10 APR 1845, August, Virginia

Death: 20 AUG 1906, Augusta, Virginia
Burial: Salem Lutheran Church Cem, Mount Sidney, Augusta, Virginia

Father: Benjamin Houff

Mother: Nancy Albright

Wife: Rebecca Link

Birth: 15 MAR 1819, Augusta, Virginia

Marriage: 10 APR 1845, Augusta, Virginia
Death: 15 DEC 1875 Mount Sidney, Augusta, Virginia
Burial: Salem Lutheran Church Cem, Mount Sidney, Augusta, Virginia

Father: William Link

Mother: Esther Charlotte Schindler

Children

1. Charlotte Virginia Houff

Female

Birth: 24 JAN 1846 Of, Mount Sidney, Augusta, Virginia
Christening:
Death: 1908
Burial:

1. Elizabeth Margaret Houff

Female

Birth: 20 NOV 1848 Of, Mount Sidney, Augusta, Virginia
Christening:
Death:
Burial

1. Gideon Cicero Houff

Male

Birth: 08 JUL 1850 Of, Mount Sidney, Augusta, Virginia
Christening:
Death:
Birth:

1. William N. Houff

Male

Birth: 29 DEC 1852 Of, Mount Sidney, Augusta, Virginia
Christening:
Death:
Burial:

1. Erasmus L. Houff

Male

Birth: 26 FEB 1855 Of, Mount Sidney, Augusta, Virginia
Christening:
Death:
Burial:

1. Walter Link Houff

Male

Birth: 02 DEC 1857 Of, Mount Sidney, Augusta, Virginia
Christening:
Death: 09 MAY 1916
Burial:

Peter E. Houff’s deceased wife, Rebecca Link Houff, died in 1875, according to her genealogical record at the same web site. There is a problem with this claim though—namely that Elizabeth Ida Juda Link and Simon P. Stover are alleged to have had only one child. Rebecca Link has no connection to Ida Elizabeth Stover, nor does Peter E. Houff. Houff could not have been her uncle, and Link could not have been her aunt. Link could not have been a sister or aunt of Ida Stover, and the Houff name has no verifiable connection to anyone in the Stover clan. Since Ida Stover was a fictional character, so were her parents.

Still not convinced? Well, if Rebecca Link did not exist, than neither did Peter Eiler Houff. The National Archives agree with this conclusion. [See below.]

http://pilot.familysearch.orgrecordsearrchstart.html=searchType=standard:collectionId-1417683:surname=Houff:givenName=Peter%20Eiler:placeId=46:eventPlace=Virginia%20C%20United%20States:p=recordResults

The above link lists 6 men in Virginia bearing the name “Peter Huff” in the 1880 Census. Four lived in Virginia, one lived in St. John the Baptist, Louisiana and the other in Lake, Ashland County, Ohio. Therefore, Peter Eiler Houff was also a fictional character, which by association, makes Ida Elizabeth Stover one, too. Since familysearch.org is the source of the fictional individual entries, the National Archives link redirects to the original source, (familysearch.org) when attempting to access the census index for Peter Eiler Houff. [The author knew this beforehand, but finding this glaring aberration hidden in Eisenhower’s ‘official’ genealogy finally settle the issue.]

If Ida Elizabeth Stover did not exist, then neither did David Jacob Eisenhower. Who would he have married? Who would she have married? The names and the stories and a few photographs exist, but they are all fraudulent. If anyone ever met these two individuals, they met ‘surrogates’ posing as the parents of David Dwight Eisenhower (aka Dwight David Eisenhower). Before losing any remaining sanity, consider the following:

We have been given a few photographic representations of David Jacob and Ida Elizabeth Stover Eisenhower, their “five sons and one daughter” (in some accounts, “six sons”) in official biographies, in books, magazines, on the Internet, and in documentary films. The largest collection of Eisenhower family photos will be found at the Eisenhower Presidential museum. One such photo is conclusively determined to be another of the now-infamous Photoshop-style creations we have become accustomed to seeing in presidential and political biographies. [Since the photo is protected by copyright restrictions and is only available through purchase, it is nonsensical to pay for a fraudulent photographic representation purportedly taken on March 16, 1902.” To view the 1902 Eisenhower family photo, entitled “Eisenhower as a Boy With His Family,” click on the link below.]

Photo 1-A
http://www.corbisimages.com:80/Enlargement.aspx?id=IH1047204&ext=1

It is apparent that the photo displayed at the above web site has not only been retouched, it is a complete compilation. Replete with unnatural lighting anomalies, i.e. intentional darkening of hair and clothing, and over-exposure of Ida’s image, background, and overhead lighting angles, it is clear that the subjects in the photo have been added separately (compiled) to create the illusion of a family photo. The lighting anomalies are intended to disguise the inconsistencies and the fraud, thereby deceiving the unwary.

The eyes of these subjects, despite the assumed presence of a photographer standing directly in front of them, are focused on imaginary objects in the room. Heads and bodies do not match or are disproportionate to the other subjects in the photo. These traits are noticeable in the group of other political figures, especially those who have already been exposed by this author in earlier genealogical investigations. Yet the general public accepts these technological creations as genuine historical mementos.

Take note of the two individuals posing as the Eisenhower parents. Study their hair, eyes, noses, ears and any other details that will help you recall what they look like. Especially take note of the father’s handlebar mustache. You will see this same individual in another photograph (a real one) where he is identified by another name. Likewise, the image of the mother will be seen in the same photo, also identified by another name. Both individuals are obviously older in the aforementioned photo [see below], though many similarities to the individuals seen in the compilation above are recognizable. The grease-penciled “1902” at the bottom of the photo was not an inscription technology available to photographers in 1902 and is another indication the photograph is fraudulent.

Photo 1-B

The above photo is another colorized reproduction of the previous black-and-white compilation. Note that the date, “1902,” is inscribed by hand at the photo’s bottom border. It differs slightly from the black-and-white version, causing the viewer to conclude that it was taken with a different camera.

Note that the eyes of the various subjects look different from the black-and-white version. Some eyes are completely closed, and when the photo is enlarged by zooming in, the closed eyes become solid black lines. Ida’s dress, the cheeks of the subjects, and the background all have a pinkish hue added for effect.

The photo has been retouched with modern technology. Color photography was not commercially available until 1907, so the photograph is an anachronism of the highest order. Whoever produced this ‘photograph’ has relied upon the ignorance of the average viewer’s knowledge of technological history. The photo is a complete fraud.

Eisenhower’s non-education in Abilene, Kansas
We have Time Magazine to thank for their September 14, 1959 article, “Education: PUBLIC SCHOOL PRODUCTS,” a gratuitous assertion that Dwight D. Eisenhower attended Abilene High School in Abilene, Kansas, graduating in 1909. The magazine and virtually all biographies fail to mention what other public schools he might have attended prior to enrolling in high school. The first Abilene High School was originally built in 1904 which is confirmed by the school’s first yearbook publication in 1905. Students from grades 8-12 attended the high school.

Photo 2-A

The first Abilene High School was leveled to make room
for a new facility which opened in 1954. While the new school was being built, “students attended class in a one-room facility above the town’s police station,” according to a current school secretary. The original high school could not have been very large if all the students could have transferred to a one-room facility. If this story is factual, classes would have been chaotic.

It is alleged that upon high school graduation, young Dwight worked for two years, to support his older brother Edgar’s college education ath the University of Michigan, as a night watchman at the Belle Springs Creamery. There is no mention of how Edgar Newton Eisenhower paid for college when Dwight left his job at the creamery.

According to the 1952 story about David Dwight Eisenhower’s birth, originally published in an unidentified Denison, TX newspaper, “Arthur Eisenhower swore that Ike was born at the time and place stated, but was not sure about the time of day. Mildred B. Burgess, notary public in Jackson County, Mo., notarized Arthur Eisenhower’s signature.” This ridiculous statement was proffered to legitimize Eisenhower’s ‘Texas’ birth, and event that did not occur.

To add fuel to the fire, birth records for “Edgar Eisenhower,” the second son born to David and Ida Eisenhower, show that he, too, was born in Denison, Texas. Birth records also indicate he was born in Hope, Dickinson, Kansas — on the same day. Despite official accounts that the Eisenhowers “already had two sons when they “arrived in Denison, TX,” government officials permit the creation and publication of 33 separate birth records on ‘official’ genealogy web sites, adding the disclaimer to the SSDI record, “This data is only accurate as of 1 Dec 2009,” the day after this scandal was first exposed (November 30, 2009). [See “Eisenhower 192 Birth-Certificate Fraud Revealed,” Don Nicoloff, Direct Light Productions.]

http://web.me.com/donnicoloff/directlightproductions.com/Articles/Entries/2009/11/29_Entry_1.html

EDGAR NEWTON EISENHOWER

Male

Event(s):

Birth: 19 JAN 1889 Denison, Fannin, Texas
Christening:
Death: 12 JUL 1971
Burial:

EDGAR N. EISENHOWER

Male

Event(s):
Birth: 19 JAN 1889 Hope, Dickinson, Kansas
Christening:
Death: 12 JUL 1971
Burial:

Parents:

Father: DAVID JACOB EISENHOWER

Mother: IDA ELIZABETH STOVER

It is alleged that Dwight D. Eisenhower passed entrance exams for both the U.S. Naval Academy at Annapolis and the U.S. Military Academy at West Point. He was declared “beyond the age of eligibility to enter the naval academy,” so upon receiving a formal recommendation for appointment to the U.S. Military Academy (from Kansas Senator Joseph L. Bristow), he attended West Point from 1911-1915.

Photo 2-B

The photo of Cadet Dwight D. Eisenhower (at right) is charming a maybe even ‘patriotic’, but it does not represent the person who is depicted in Photo 2-A, which may likely be, itself, equally fraudulent.

A somewhat rounded face in Photo 2-A has suddenly acquired a flat forehead, a square jaw, smaller ears, deep-set eye sockets with a lazy eye which has become lazier in Photo 2-B. Those same eyes have even become smaller in size, though the subject is purported to be 8-7 years older.

In Photo 2-A, we see an alleged 12-year-old boy with a spotless complexion, yet in Photo 2-B at about age 20, he has freckles—lots of freckles—and those freckles will have disappeared in the next series of photos representing a period five years later.

Cadet Eisenhower’s nose has now become narrow and protrudes past his upper lip, though it rested well short of that point a few years earlier. Photo 2-B is determined to be a fraudulent one, just by comparing the basic features in Photo 2-A.

Ensuing photos will underscore key points of this analysis.

Photo 2-C

In an effort to further substantiate Dwight D. Eisenhower’s attendance at West Point, Photo 2-C (above) was published to show his ‘membership’ on the Academy football team. Eisenhower, claimed to be the second subject from the left, suddenly has much darker hair than the blond hair seen in other photographs. The accounts of his “knee injuries” from having been “tackled about the ankles” are equally ridiculous. But the myths continue today.

After five years, he graduated in the top 50% of his class, so we can also determine that he was not a particularly bright individual. [It would have been logical for the U.S. Naval Academy to have first determined his age before testing his intellectual prowess. See “The Three Stooges go to Washington, Parts 1 and 2,” for details about John sidney McCain, Sr. (aka John McCann).]

Dwight D. Eisenhower: An officer, a gentleman, and a ‘giant’ of a football coach
Upon his graduation from West Point, it is alleged that Lt. Dwight D. Eisenhower (also referred to as “Second Lieutenant) was stationed at Ft. Sam Houston, San Antonio, Texas, his first post assignment.

The Eisenhower Foundation described the introduction of Lt. Eisenhower to his future wife, Mamie Geneva Doud with the following:

“On a beautiful October day in 1915, Eisenhower was on duty, assigned to walk the post and inspect the guard. Fellow soldier and new friend, Gee Gerow, recognized Eisenhower from across the street and beckoned him to join the casual lawn party where the Douds of Denver were among the guests. Although he had recently ‘sworn off women‘—once he had met eighteen-year-old Miss Mamie Geneva Doud, he pursued her with singular determination. Nine months later, July 1, 1916, they were married in the Doud home, and set out on a ten-day honeymoon in Colorado and on to Kansas to visit Dwight’s parents and brother Milton at Kansas State College.”

Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia describes the couple’s meeting, marriage, and honeymoon a bit differently:

“It was soon after completing her education at Miss Wolcott’s finishing school that she met Dwight Eisenhower at San Antonio in October 1915. Introduced by Mrs. Lulu Harris, wife of a fellow officer at Fort Sam Houston, the two hit it off at once, as Eisenhower, officer of the day, invited Miss Doud to accompany him on his rounds. On St. Valentine’s Day in 1916 he gave her a miniature of his West Point class ring to seal a formal engagement.

“Lieutenant Dwight D. Eisenhower, aged 25, married Mamie Doud, aged 19, on July 1, 1916, at the home of the bride’s parents in Denver, Colorado. Following the wedding, performed by Reverend Williamson of the Central Presbyterian Church in Denver, the newlyweds honeymooned a couple days at Eldorado Springs, Colorado a resort near Denver, and then visited the groom’s parents in Abilene before settling into the lieutenant’s crude living quarters at Fort Sam Houston.”

Both stories sound romantic and might even warn the cockles of the reader’s heart, but neither tale is based upon one iota of truth. Here is why:

The claim that “Reverend Williamson” from Denver’s Central Presbyterian Church married Dwight Eisenhower and Mamie Doud at her parents’ home is false. There was a “Reverend W. E. Williamson,” a minister at the Central Presbyterian Church, but that church was in Petersburg, Illinois — from 1894-1895 — a full 21 years prior to the Eisenhower ‘wedding’.

In her historical review, “From 1989 SESQUICENTENNIAL CELEBRATION: Central Presbyterian Church of Petersburg, Illinois, Part 1 — THE FIRST 125 YEARS (1839-1964).” http://www.central-pres.org/150part1.htm Nellie Denton Owen Fox wrote:

“During 1893-1895, under the guidance of the Rev. W. E. Williamson, the congregation made rapid progress. In 1896, there was some difficulty within the congregation which was not reconciled for a year. Reconciliation was due largely to the efforts of Ruling Elder Arthur Young.”

Rev. Williamson did lead a congregation, but it was not the Denver parish. Was it possible that the Presbytery transferred him to Denver anytime during 1916? I determined that the period from 1900-1920 would be sufficient to determine if there was any truth to the claim that Rev. Williamson performed a marriage ceremony on July 1, 1916.

Denver’s Central Presbyterian Church kept immaculate records, and from 1900-1925, there were only three ministers who served as pastor. Those pastors were:

The Rev. R. F. Coyle (October 7, 1900 - June 7, 1914) [Reverend Coyle left the church upon serving in the
U.S. military during WWI.]
The Rev. John McNeill (September 21, 1914 - September 21, 1916)
The Rev. W. H. Wray Boyle (March 7, 1917 - June 28, 1925)

So the Denver, Colorado ‘marriage’ was a hoax that is exposed here, some 93 and 1/2 years later. Still, the Eisenhower Foundation’s web site portrays two ‘wedding photos’ purported to commemorate the Eisenhowers’ wedding on July 1, 1916. The setting of the first photo is undisclosed, though the second photo, also alleged to be taken on the same day, clearly features the main steps to the front entrance of St. Louis Hall, St. Louis College, San Antonio, Texas. The second photo is intended to legitimize the story that the Eisenhowers met in San Antonio and that Dwight “coached football” at the college.

Analysis of these photos [below] will clearly prove that one was taken in a foreign country, and the other was created by compiling images )from the same foreign country) into another setting conclusively proven to be in San Antonio, Texas. If these photos represent a fictitious story, they they, themselves, are fraudulent. Both photos are analyzed below and compared to a legitimate photo featuring the identical setting:

Photo 3-A

The photo above commemorates the “Denver, CO wedding” of the Eisenhowers, though an analysis of the setting will reveal why the event could not have been photographed at the “Doud home,” purported to have been located at “750 Lafayette St., Denver, CO.”

The newlyweds posed for this photograph at a window-seat setting that was far too disproportionate for a 2,815-sq.-ft. home on a 6,250 sq.-ft. lot, Mamie sitting on the window seat and Dwight standing at her side. The setting is more reminiscent of a room with 12-20 ft. ceilings, and so it would have not been located in the Doud home.

Neither subject appears to be appropriately dressed for their own wedding ceremony which, gauging by the darkness visible through the window, occurred at night. Dwight face is unnaturally shadowed, his collar exhibits no sign of shadowing, and his entire image appears to have been ‘Photoshopped’ into the picture. He is waring the ‘dress whites’ of an army officer, but they are not American issue. Notice he not wearing a belt.

The image of Mamie also appears to have been ‘Photoshopped’, evident by the unnatural shading of her face and dress and the contortion of the fingers on her left hand. Only the bottom of her dress is illuminated by the camera’s flash, as if it were a veil laid across her lap. Upon enlargement, both subjects begin to pixelate before the curtains or window frames, which is indicative of a compiled image. The overall tone of the photo is European in nature, but the picture is nothing more than a multidimensional fraud. [See Photo 3-B below.]

Photo 3-B

The Doud’s Denver home was a traditional 3-story colonial home built in 1905. The ceilings of such homes were constructed with 8’-9’ interior ceilings. The window is clearly not appropriate for a colonial home and is Gothic in style. Standard windows in a colonial home are usually no wider than 3 ft., yet we can see that the window in the photo extends behind the light-diffusing curtains (behind Mamie) to the right, far beyond the standard 3-ft. width. The window is obviously taller and wider than what would be architecturally appropriate (or found) in a standard 1905 colonial home, especially when viewing the home’s actual photo.

Photo 3-C

The Detroit Tigers’ 1909 spring training camp was located in San Antonio, TX prior to the 1909 baseball season. After a March 18 game versus the St. Louis College team, both teams posed for a picture (a real one) on the steps of St. Louis Hall. The photo allows us to see what real subjects look like an such a setting, and we can see the details of the sandstone steps, the front doors, and the surrounding architecture. The photo also serves as a means of identifying the location of the two ‘wedding photos’ of Dwight and Mamie Eisenhower taken in mid-summer on July 1, 1916.

Photo 3-D

The Eisenhower photos (3-D, E, and J) seem quite normal upon first glance by the unwary, though they are actually replete with numerous anomalies. The first represents a print taken with a Kodak “Brownie”-type camera and is currently posted on American Picture Link’s web site as part of a collage of official, ‘youth’, and ‘family’ photos.
http://americanpicturelinks.com/34de.htm

The photo is a composite modified by adding unnatural ‘yellowing’ (retouched with septia tones) to give it the appearance of having aged over time. Remarkably, a clear black-and-white version of the same photo is posted on Dwight D. Eisenhower’s widipedia.org biography. Enlarging this 2nd edition of the photo reveals an overly-tanned Dwight D. Eisenhower, a feature which is lacking in the alleged ‘original’ yellow version of the same photograph.

The captions underneath each photo, “Wedding Portrait 1916,” imply that both photos were taken in Denver, Colorado where the wedding is alleged to have occurred on July 1, 1916. However, much to the dismay of those involved in perpetrating this massive hoax upon the American people and the world at-large, the subjects in both photos were compiled (inserted) into a background of the steps leading to the main entrance of St. Louis Hall, St. Louis College, San Antonio, Texas. Several logical conclusions will prove that this analysis is not only accurate, it totally debunks the story of the Eisenhower wedding in Denver, on the basis of fraudulent, fabricated, and material photographic evidence.

Photo 3-E

Photo 3-E is a black-and-white copy of Photo 3-D (above) and like its predecessor, it is very obvious that it is a compilation.

Although the top steps are slightly visible now, they are still too bright and look unnatural. Overall, the picture has been darkened to such an extent that Dwight’s face has become a silver-gray which is very noticeable upon magnification.

The Wikipedia article which features this photo describes the location as “the steps of St. Mary’s University.” At the time this photo was alleged to have been taken, the school was called “St. Louis College.” The article also failed to mention that Dwight was 8’-3” tall, and Mamie was 7’-3”.

The details of Dwight’s Austrian Army uniform are more pronounced in this version of Photo 3-D, and on can clearly see the cloth buttons on his jacket.

Compared to the Harry Truman image in Photo 3-F, Dwight’s boots are not even close to matching the style of U.S. Army issue boots. As is typical with any Hegelian dialectic, if one repeats a lie often enough, people will believe it. The photo is no more convincing than its predecessor — Photo 3-D — which is a lesson in futility.

We can begin our analysis by comparing the number of visible sandstone steps seen in Photos 3-C, D, E, and J. The steps seen in the St.Louis College/Detroit Tigers photo (from 1909) number 11-1/2 in total. At ground level is a 4-inch base course followed by 11 eight-inch steps which rise to a total of 92 inches, from the ground level to the porch area at the front entrance (double doors).

The Eisenhower photos obfuscate these details, first by omitting 1-1/2 steps at the base of the staircase. Counting from the top step in the Eisenhower photo (the washed-out portion visible in Photo 3-D), we can see that Mamie and Dwight appear to be standing on the 10th step, 80 inches below the porch. By using the stairs as a reference of height, Mamie would have been about 87 inches tall, or 7’-3”. Dwight would have been about 99 inches tall, or 8’-3”. He was actually closer to 5’-10” tall. So, on this basis alone, the ‘wedding photo’ taken on July 1, 1916 at San Antonio’s St. Louis Hall is a fraud.

Another anomaly is the missing demi-column to the left of the double doors, which is clearly visible in the baseball team photo. The top two steps have also been obscured by the insertion of a white background. The brick construction of the building is also masked by the washed-out appearance intended to reduce details.

The most glaring anomalies in Photos 3-D and E are found in the excessive winter clothes worn by Mamie and the army uniform worn by Dwight. Considering what the average July 1st temperature might have been in South Texas, is not excessive to be wearing a full-length, fur-lined winter ensemble, a winter scarf wrapped around one’s chin and throat, a head scarf, and boots?

Dwight’s woolen army uniform must have been stifling in the Texas summer heat, yet he is wearing the white undergarments seen in Photo 3-A. The heaviness of his uniform’s material is the least of his problems, though. It is likely that without sporting a belt, he is ‘out of uniform’. Notice the insignia on the front of his hat. It is not one belonging to the U.S. Army. Also take a close look at the pocket flaps of his jacket. Standard U.S. Army pocket flaps had the teardrop shape at the button, but not at both corners of each flap. The boots he is wearing are not U.S. Army issue. [See former President Harry Truman’s 1916 issue U.S. Army uniform in Photo 3-G below]

If Eisenhower was not wearing a U.S. Army uniform in Photos 3-C, D, E, and J, then what army’s uniform was he wearing? An Austria-Hungarian Army uniform.
http://americanpicturelinks.com/34de.htm

Photo 3-F

At right is a representation of a U.S. Army officer’s uniform in 1916, as worn by former U.S. President Harry Truman.

Comparing this uniform to the one worn by Dwight Eisenhower in Photos 3-C, D, E, and J, it appears to be complete, neatly pressed, and conforming with military standards in all respects. Note that the pocket flaps are rectangular in shape, except where the flap is buttoned. Truman is also wearing his belt, a detail which is lacking in the Eisenhower military photos.

The following photos (below) depict the uniform of the Austrian Army during WWI. They are identical to the uniform worn by Dwight David Eisenhower in his ‘St. Louis College’ photos of the football team and upon his 1916 marriage in “Denver, CO” and “San Antonio, TX” The uniforms were worn by soldiers from the Bukovina region of Austria-Hungary.

The shirt pocket flaps flare downward at the button holes and at the corners. The coat buttons are cloth-covered and not made of brass, like those seen in Photo 3-F. To say the analysis of the uniform and the fraudulent nature of the photos are revealing is an understatement. It is unimaginable that no one noticed these anomalies during the past 85 years.

Photo 3-G

Photo 3-G depicts a soldier, Rudolf Zoglauer, wearing an Austro-Hungarian Army uniform. Zoglauer was stationed at Pernegg, Austria during WWI and was from Radautz, Bukovina.

Judging from the hat he wore, he may have been an officer. Agin, we see the now-familiar pocket flaps seen in Photos 3-D, E, J, and now H and I (below).

Note that the jacket buttons are hidden behind a flap that runs from the collar to the bottom. The upright, banded collar is not buttoned and reveals the white undergarment seen in the Eisenhower photos, but not in the photo (3-F). The collar also lacked a button, though the shoulder flaps have brass ones.

Zoglauer’s trouser were somewhat tapered and tucked underneath a cloth ban at the top of the shoe. Many of these features are visible in other military photos of the Austria-Hungarian Army. Uniforms tend to vary slightly from one regiment to another, some wearing boots and trousers more appropriate for horseback riding.

Zoglauer sent this photo to his mother and mother-in-law in Radautz, Bukovina with the following letter:

“Mother, Dearest Mother-in-law,
I am sending my own photograph in memory that I was
a soldier and wrote on Good Friday on 2/4/1915 [April 2, 1915].
Dearest treasured Mother,
Do not forget my Kati and children, for at this time, as their father, I am far away from my dear children and Kati. I hope, by dear God, to see you again soon. Greetings and kisses to you.
Your son-in-law,
Rudolf
Together with Kati and children, otherwise greet everyone for me.”

[English translation from German by Don Nicoloff]

http://www.bukovinasociety.org/museum/ancestor-in-uniform/Zoglauer-Rudolf-1880-02-24-in-uniform-1915.html

Photo 3-H

Photo 3-H is another example of a Bukovina Army uniform during WWI. The soldier is identified as “Franz Schönthaler” (husband of Maria Schönthaler)

This soldier sported a different hat and a belt with a bayonet sheath, unlike previous examples of the Austrian Army uniform. he has been decorated with at least one medal and is wearing a band pinned with two stars, one on each side of his collar.

His shoulder flaps indicate that he was an officer, likely deployed to the front with the infantry.

The pocket flaps of his jacket are consistent with those in Photos 3-D, E, G, I, and J (below).

Schönthaler’s trousers were also tapered and wrapped with a cloth band, from just below the knees to the ankles. It is likely that his boots were masked by the wraps.

[Photos 3-G and 3-H courtesy of bukovinasociety.org]

http://www.bukovinasociety.org/museum/ancestors-in-uniform/Bukovina-men-in-uniform.html#ks

Photo 3-I

At right is a closeup view of a standard Austro-Hungarian Army jacket from a WWI-era photograph. Details of the collar and pocket flap can be seen, and clearly, this uniform had been designed to look different from those of other world armies. Dwight D. Eisenhower’s 1916 army uniform was a carbon copy of the one seen at right.

Had “Dwight D. Eisenhower” married “Mamie Geneva Doud,” there would have been a record of such an event, though not necessarily a legitimate one. We now know the “Reverend Williamson” from the Central Presbyterian Church in Denver could not have married the couple because he was not the minister at the church—ever. So where and when did the Eisenhowers marry? Not in the U.S., and not on July 1, 1916. If the story was factual, there would have been no reason to lie about it, and there would have been no cause for fabricating photos of an otherwise true event. There was no ‘Denver’ marriage—so there was no ‘Colorado/Kansas’ honeymoon.

The ‘honeymoon’ story is another fable that automatically debunks the ‘Ft. Sam Houston’ stories, including Eisenhower’s ‘first assignment’ at the base, his introduction to Mamie Geneva Doud, the ensuing courtship, and the hoax of his having “coached the St. Louis College football team.” Below is another photo compiled in order to further obfuscate his non-presence at Ft. Sam Houston and St. Louis College. That his job as “football coach” would have been permitted or tolerated by U.S. Army officials is preposterous. The photo below underscores the farcical nature of such a claim:

Photo 3-J

Proffering the photo above as ‘proof’ that Lt. Dwight D. Eisenhower coached the St. Louis College football team, we can see a clearer picture of the steps leading to the main entrance to St. Louis Hall. Again, the demi-columns seen in Photo 3-C are suspiciously absent, and the top step is artificially lightened.

Though this photo is one of the better ones seen, it is another ‘Photoshop’ creation. The spacing of the subjects is suspect, as well as Lt. Eisenhower’s towering presence in the middle of the photo. It is doubtful that St. Louis College even had a football team, but if they did, Lt. Dwight D. Eisenhower was not their coach.

The well-lit subjects do not cast shadows, except where there has been intentional, unnatural shadowing added. Magnification of the photo reveals many different anomalies, especially in the shapes of the subjects’ eyes, noses, and mouths. Some eyes are closed, some mouths lips, and jaws are out of alignment, and faces appear to have been pressed between two panes of glass. Creative? Yes. Convincing? No. Genuine? You decide. Note that Lt. Eisenhower is still sporting his Austrian Army uniform, and his image is 100% fraudulent.

Since the Eisenhowers now appear to be someone other than who they have claimed to bee, we must rightfully be suspicious of any genealogical information, birth records, and biographical accounts offered by them or any of their many agents.

This is the end of Part 1 — Click here to go directly to Part 2

© 2009 by Don Nicoloff / Direct Light Productions

directlightproductions.com

Eisenhower 1952 Birth-Certificate Fraud Revealed

Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:00:12 -0500

By Don Nicoloff

November 29, 2009

It seems that in 2009 we do not have to go far in finding the Truth. The Truth has its own way of finding us.

After discovering the true identities of "George Herbert Walker Bush, Sr." (aka George H. Scherff, Jr.) [see "Deathbed confessions, photos support claims that George H. Scherff, Jr. was the 41st U.S. President,” Part 1 and Part 2" The Idaho Observer, April, 2007], "Senator John Sydney McCain, III" (aka John McCann, II) and "Barack Hussein Obama" (aka Barry Soetoro and Barry Rockefeller) [see "The Three Stooges go to Washington, Parts 1-7b, The Idaho Observer, May 20, 2008-July 18, 2009], it should come as no surprise that another U.S. president has been caught in several lies that warrant forensic investigation of his genealogy.

A recently-discovered 1952 Texas newspaper clipping, from either The Denison Herald or The Sherman Democrat, describes a birth certificate controversy which involved then-U.S. Presidential candidate Gen. Dwight D. "Ike" Eisenhower. Eisenhower went on to become the 34th President of the United States, serving two terms before leaving office in 1961.

Another birth certificate scandal
Eisenhower was allegedly born on October 14, 1890 in Denison, Texas. After receiving a letter from an undisclosed New York law firm during the 1952 presidential campaign, Harold Schmitzer, the Denison City Secretary replied that Eisenhower did not have a birth certificate filed with with the Grayson County Clerk's Office [a now-familiar pattern in U.S. presidential genealogies].

Lonnie F. Roberts, having read a Denison newspaper article that described Eisenhower's unrecorded birth, checked with the county clerk's office in Sherman, Texas to see if there was a recorded birth certificate. The clerk's office said that there was no such recording.

Roberts then requested compiled birth information from Gen. Eisenhower through Mamie Eisenhower in Denver, Colorado. The information was entered into a formal, legal birth certificate and sent to Arthur B. Eisenhower (in Kansas City, Missouri) to be notarized as an official witness to the birth. Judge J. N. Dickson (the source of the newspaper archive) signed the certificate which was recorded by County Clerk J.C. Buchanan. Once the certificate was recorded, it was sent back to Mrs. Eisenhower.

If there ever existed a further public controversy regarding Eisenhower's birthplace, it was definitely quashed. However, sufficient biographical accounts have been written in an attempt to legitimize Dwight D. Eisenhower's birth in Denison, Texas, a fact that few dare dispute — that is, until now.

Eisenhower's 'smoking cannon': A Texas newspaper article

The following is a verbatim transcription of the aforementioned article found in a Denison, TX newspaper, "Ike Gets Birth Certificate; Filed In Courthouse Here," whose publisher/author is/are (currently) unknown:

'Ike Gets Birth Certificate; Filed In Courthouse Here'

    'Dwight David Eisenhower now has a birth certificate officially recorded in the office of the County Clerk, Grayson County, Texas. The certificate was signed Wednesday by County Judge J.N. Dickson and recorded by County Clerk J.C. Buchanan. It is the first official notation of Eisenhower's birth Oct. 14, 1890, in Denison.

    The filing came about through a long process. A New York law firm wrote Harold Schmitzer, Denison City Secretary, asking if Eisenhower has a birth certificate registered in that city. Schmitzer replied there was none. A Denison newspaper carried a story saying Eisenhower's birth had never been recorded.

    Lonnie F. Roberts read the story and checked with the county clerk's office in Sherman, who told him there was no birth certificate recorded for the Republican presidential nominee.

    Roberts wrote Mrs. Mamie Eisenhower in Denver, Colo., asking if she would compile the birth information from the general. Mrs. Eisenhower wrote Roberts that I was very amused when he learned he had never been "born" officially.

   As soon as Roberts received the information from Mrs. Eisenhower he drew up a formal, legal birth certificate which he sent to Ike's brother, Arthur B. Eisenhower, in Kansas City, Mo.

    Arthur Eisenhower swore that Ike was born at the time and place stated, but was not sure about the time of day. Mildred B. Burgess, notary public in Jackson County, Mo., notarized Arthur Eisenhower's signature.

    Roberts received the elder Eisenhower's reply Wednesday, and promptly brought the document to Sherman for recording.

He is now sending the certificate back to Mrs. Eisenhower.'

Eisenhower's political 'guardian angel'
It is apparent that Lonnie F. Roberts either had enough political clout or was instructed to create a birth certificate on Dwight D. Eisenhower's behalf. Who was Lonnie F. Roberts? How is it that he was able to circumvent Texas and Federal law, the Federal Elections Commission, and the U.S. Constitution, fraudulently creating a birth certificate by using the U.S. Post Office, a few biased relatives, and a Texas judge? Judge Dickson was obviously instructed to certify the document, but by whom?

Based on a few forthcoming facts, Lonnie F. Roberts, Arthur B. Eisenhower, and Mr. and Mrs. Dwight D. Eisenhower would have, at least, committed mail fraud, a felony. Was this now the benchmark for asserting one's birthplace and citizenship? And why weren't doctors, hospitals, or other medical officials contacted to corroborate a birth? The usual "they-didn't-keep-good-records-in-those-days" excuse does not apply. There were no records because the story is yet another U.S.-presidential genealogical fraud.

Certainly, administrative officials at the West Point Military Academy would have required a birth certificate or other proof of citizenship upon his enrollment to the school. Did Eisenhower state that he was born in Denison, TX?

Records indicate that there were two "Lonnie F. Roberts" born in Texas, the first in 1911 and the second in 1922. We will focus on the one born in 1911, as there is an army record of a "Pvt. Lonnie F. Roberts" (February 25, 1911-January 11, 1989). The 1930 U.S. Census in Los Angeles, CA lists him at age 18, born "about 1912." About 1912? This is the same method of obfuscation employed by the Bush/Walker clans, the McCain/Vaulx clans, and the Obama/Soetoro clans. Coincidentally, Dwight D. Eisenhower was issued his Social Security number in California.

Both Roberts were issued Social Security numbers in the state of Colorado, which puts one or both in direct proximity to the Eisenhowers, according to their residence in Denver. Pvt. Roberts was likely instructed, as were the other participants in the scheme, to manufacture a birth certificate and insure the cooperation of the Grayson County judge. It is likely that the two aforementioned articles were never read outside of Denison, TX. Ike (or his handlers) probably saw to that.

By now, the reader may be wondering, "So, where is the crime here? Where is the fraud?" These questions will be answered shortly.

A gratuitous, repetitious biographical account minimizes negative publicity about the hoax
In "Denison: Birth Place of a President," Archie P. McDonald, Ph.D penned, for the East Texas Historical Society, an anecdotal account of Eisenhower's birthplace.

http://www.texasescapes.com/DEPARTMENTS/Guest_Columnists/East_Texas_all_things_historical/DenisonBirthPlaceOfPresident1AMD301.htm

Mr. McDonald wrote (in part):

'...What is in question here is this: was Ike a Texan, where he was born, or a Kansan, where he grew to young adulthood before going off to West Point in 1911?

And the answer probably should be that Ike was a citizen of the world who rarely lived anywhere for long after his graduation from West Point until his final residence on a farm near Gettysburg, Pennsylvania.

That Ike was born in Denison, Texas, on October 14, 1890, was confirmed by his mother. When Ike became famous during the war, Jennie Jackson wrote to ask if he had been born in Denison. He responded that he did not know and directed her to his mother, who said that Ike entered the world in this north Texas railroad town. Specifically, Ike was born in the front bedroom of a two-story structure located at the corner of Lamar and Day streets, adjacent to the Missouri, Kansas, and Texas Railroad.

The reason for this blessing came to the Eisenhower's [sic] in Denison was that Ike's father, David J. Eisenhower, worked as a wiper for the MKT in the Dennison rail yards. Within six months of the event the Eisenhower family returned to Kansas and Ike grew up in Abilene, which he and others always regarded as his "home town."

Ike visited his birthplace three times: first, in 1946 while still in the Army; in 1952 while campaigning for the presidency; and in 1965, just four years before his death. From the nine-foot statue of Eisenhower in his WWII uniform, which greets visitors in the yard, through photos and artifacts which occupy every room, the visitor is reminded of the era in which Ike was born. ...'

Giving Mr. McDonald the benefit of the doubt, he probably was unaware of Eisenhower's birth certificate controversy. That he relied upon anecdotes and third-hand accounts is typical, especially where records do not exist. But McDonald did address the birthplace issue more than a few times, which had obviously consumed a major portion of his piece.

Had this author relied upon similar research methods, this exposé would not have been written. But then, Mr. McDonald probably did not have the luxury of reading the 1952 Denison newspaper article which described a manufactured birth certificate.

Eisenhower's self-incriminating disclosures dispute historical accounts
Dwight D. Eisenhower could have never imagined that information he gave an INS agent at Ellis Island would come back to posthumously haunt him 85 years later. As detailed in an Ellis Island passenger manifest, on September 27, 1924, returning from Cristobal, Canal Zone on the USS Cristobal, Maj. Dwight D. Eisenhower made two declarations to Customs Officials: 1) that he was "34 years of age," and 2) that he was born in "Tyler, Texas."

Based on his published birthdate, Eisenhower was only 33 years of age on Sept. 27, 1924. This may seem insignificant, though no one reaches the age of 34 until one's 34th birthday. It has always been that way. So why did he misstate his age, or was he just confused?

On this same day in 1924, Eisenhower declared his birthplace was "Tyler, Texas." Certainly, a major in the U.S. Army would have known where he was born. After all, everyone else who has studied anything about Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower, the 34th President of the United States, has heard that he was born in "Denison, TX." That was the storyline in 1952, but Eisenhower's 1924 U.S. Customs declaration disputes this more recent claim.

In naming Tyler, TX as his place of birth, Eisenhower did not describe a suburb of Denison. The distance between the two towns via US-69 S, in 1952 and 2009 terms, is 130 miles — a 3-1/2 hour trip by automobile. The same trip today, via US 75 S from Denison to I-20 E (through the Dallas metropolitan area), then onto US-69 S totals 164 miles and is estimated to take 2 hours, 43 minutes. Eisenhower could not have been confused about the locations or distance between the two towns, could he?

During the same Ellis Island incident, either Dwight and/or Mamie Eisenhower informed the INS agent that their son, John Sheldon, age 2, was born in "Hennen, Colorado." A search for Hennen reveals no results, and several current residents of the state attest to the fact that they have never heard of it. Perusing the USS Cristobal passenger list, on lines 18 and 19 were the names of two respective passengers: Lawrence (Keyser, W. VA) and Mrs. Mary C. (Norfield, VA). Their last names? "Hennen."

Official accounts of John Sheldon Eisenhower's birthplace indicate that he was born in Denver, Colorado. Why did the Eisenhowers say he was born in Hennen, CO? Might he have been born in the Canal Zone, outside of the United States? Was this another feeble attempt to legitimize the Eisenhowers and their 2-year-old son as Americans?

Conclusions
The three biographical inconsistencies (above) prove that Eisenhower's 'official' accounts are fictional. It is implausible that anyone, let alone a private in the U.S. Army, after reading a newspaper article, would independently spearhead a plot to create a birth certificate for a U.S. presidential candidate. It is equally ridiculous to assume that the ultimate investigative task would have been assigned to Mamie Eisenhower, wife of the former Supreme Commander of Allied forces in Europe and the first supreme commander of NATO.

Born as "David Dwight Eisenhower," it is inconceivable that Eisenhower changed his name to "Dwight D. Eisenhower" while attending West Point Military Academy, without first submitting a genuine birth certificate. Had he done so, there would have been no controversy in Denison, TX prior to the presidential election of 1952. And his statements to the INS agent at Ellis Island might not ever have been scrutinized.

It is ironic that the president who warned us about the looming "military/industrial complex," in his farewell speech to the nation, failed to warn us about his own dubious, genealogical background. At least, Grayson County Judge J.N. Dickson saved a most-revealing newspaper article for posterity's sake, an act of patriotism if ever there was one.

These revelations will undoubtedly lead to many others hidden beneath a quagmire of international political obfuscation. The Truth, despite preconceived notions, has a way of appearing at the most propitious times, and these are very auspicious times.

The Eisenhowers, more than anyone else, would have truly known where they were born. They just forgot to tell everyone else.

© 2009 By Don Nicoloff / Direct Light Productions

directlightproductions.com

Ft. Hood-winked: Newest false-flag shooting story riddled with holes

Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:14:27 -0500

By Don Nicoloff

November 16, 2009

KILLEEN, TX — On November 5, 2009, a crazed gunman went on a shooting rampage at Ft. Hood, the largest army base in the U.S., leaving 12 dead and 31 wounded U.S. Army personnel in his wake. Initial mainstream media reports first pinned the shootings on "five," then "three" assailants. By day's end, the MSM had whittled their list of unnamed suspects down to one: Major Nidal Malik Hasan, an Army psychiatrist alleged to have been selected for deployment to Afghanistan.

Initial reports were in stark contrast to amended updates, first, by the hour, then by the minute. One shooter was proclaimed to have been killed and another wounded before escaping. "Major Hasan stormed into the base processing center wielding a 9-mm pistol and a .45 caliber handgun, shooting at everyone in sight" until he was subdued by base security officers.

Described as a 'crack marksman', Major Hasan entered the processing center, emptied his two handguns, reloaded, and continued firing upon dozens of fleeing, unarmed victims. Hasan was shot in the crossfire, initially pronounced dead, but later "in stable condition," "critical condition," "in a coma," and finally, "resting comfortably while recovering from four gunshot wounds." On Friday, the 13th of November, Hasan was officially charged for the murder of 13 victims and 30 wounded, the list reflecting one additional death.

Contrary to media reports and press conferences conducted by base commander Lt. General Robert W. Cone, there were multiple accounts of "automatic weapons fire" heard by base personnel attending a graduation ceremony, by soldiers living in the barracks, theater employees, and by other base employees. In fact, there were at least three separate incidents occurring on the base, according to independent reports made by witnesses outside of the MSM.

One such report described two soldiers who were slated to be deployed in Afghanistan being counseled by Major Hasan within their quarters at the base barracks, not in the processing center. The two soldiers had declared that attempts to force them into deployment "would be met with force." It was alleged by those witnesses that Hasan, a practicing Muslim, was blamed for the incident in order to quash rumors of insubordination and low morale among vociferous Army personnel against the war in Afghanistan and elsewhere in the Middle East.

If this assessment is true, then it is apparent that Major Hasan's Palestinian heritage, along with his Muslim faith, became the major foundation for a military/media coverup of immense proportions. The public's reaction to the 'facts' indicates that the cover story has, so far, met with a modicum of success. However, a precursory examination of Major Nidal Malik Hasan's background and medical qualifications paints an entirely different picture. The Pentagon would certainly have taken those facts into consideration prior to promoting him to the status of 'Major', an unlikely promotion, unless his mission was other than that revealed through public records.

An independent investigation by The I/O reveals discrepancies in the aforementioned timelines, along with numerous aliases that dispute both the factual and chronological bases of the official story. We will attempt to indicate and elucidate facts which have either been exaggerated or obfuscated, in order to conceal Major Hasan's covert role in the Pentagon's MK-Ultra Mind Control program. It should then become clear to the reader that the Ft. Hood shootings were likely a diversionary tactic intended to misdirect attention away from another covert operation occurring simultaneously on the base. We will also reveal the covert operation which, in the minds of the perpetrators of that event, necessitated such a diversion.

Major Nidal Malik Hasan's Palestinian roots
According to the 'official' background investigation conducted by two consultants, the Northeast Intelligence Network and Canada Free Press, who appear, by implication, to have been subcontracted by the Department of Homeland Security, Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan's parents were Malik Awakallah Hasan, 52 (August 7, 1946 - April 16, 1998) and Hanan Ismail (Nora) Hasan, 49 (January 15, 1952 - May 30, 2001). Both were young immigrants from Palestine who succeeded in business, owning the Capitol Restaurant, the Mount Olive Grill and Bar, and the Community Grocery Store on Elm Avenue in Roanoke, VA. Malik emigrated at age 16 and Nora, his wife, "as a young girl." Mrs. Hasan "followed her husband to Roanoke in 1986," one year after his arrival there. [Obituary: The Roanoke Times, VA, April 18, 1998 and Obituary: The Roanoke Times, May 31, 2001.]

Background checks on Malik Awakallah Hasan and Hanan Ismail (Nora) Hasan reveal quite a different story. Both have used aliases, a fact which leads directly to associations within and outside of U.S./international intelligence communities. What we are not told in their respective obituaries is why there was a separation of at least one year when Malik went to Roanoke, VA in 1985 to begin his career as a restauranteur/grocer. And though Malik developed the restaurants and grocery store without the aid of Hasan, she is credited as having been the driving force behind their success.

How Malik Awakallah Hasan financed the purchases of three food outlets is unknown, especially when virtually no information about his education and prior vocation(s) is available. Though "he died in 1998," virtually no official death record for a "Malik Awakallah Hasan" exists worldwide. Death records are also suspiciously absent for "Hanan Ismail (Nora) Hasan." Neither Malik nor Hanan had Social Security numbers, so one could rightfully conclude that their names were aliases. Other than obituary references, the couple's lives seemed to materialize and then dematerialize into the same thin air. However, their aliases would tell a different story.

The Hasan family's home at 666 Ramada Rd., Vinton, VA was a few miles east of Roanoke, the location of the family's food businesses. The house was sold to Alma Jerkovic, who purchased it "ten years ago." Further to the west lies Blacksburg, home of Virginia Tech, where Nidal Malik Hasan is alleged to have enrolled as an ROTC candidate, earning a bachelor's degree in biochemistry from the Center for Applied Behavior Systems, a U.S. psychological warfare training center.

Major Hasan's secret research expertise
According to official records, Maj. Hasan attended graduate school and received his medical degree from the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD in 2003 — home of MK-ULTRA, the military's covert mind-control program. Hasan was also a researcher for the military's U.S. Center for the Study of Traumatic Stress, whose web site mysteriously disappeared off the Internet shortly after the Ft. Hood shootings. It is also alleged that Maj. Hasan had been researching Radio Hypnotic Antra-Cerebral-Control Electronic Dissolution of Memory (RHIC-EDAM), a CIA project.

The 'official' references to Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan's military career and his medical education are questionable at best. A mid-level officer designation would likely have afforded him a high security clearance. The www.vahealthprovider.com (Virginia Board of Medicine, Practitioner Information) web site refers to him as "Nidal Malik Hasan, MD," certification number, "0101238630." All of Hasan's entries were updated on 10/13/09, though no certifications or publications are listed to date. Hasan was transferred to Ft. Hood in July, 2009.

The Virginia BofM also lists post-graduate studies in "Psychiatry, WRAMC [Walter Reed Army Medical Center], Washington, D.C., USA, Year Residency Completed: 2007. Disaster and Preventative Psychiatry, USUHS/WRAMC, Bethesda, MD, USA, Year Fellowship Completed: 2009."

Hasan's primary practice address: Darnall Army Medical Center, 36000 Darnall Loop, Ft. Hood, TX 76544. Phone: 301-547-1599. The phone number, also printed on Hasan's business card, is an "unlisted" landline in Bethesda, MD. Evidently, it was protocol to have calls forwarded to Bethesda, MD, despite his being reassigned to Ft. Hood. In spite of his "poor performance" at WRAMC, he was allowed to continue his psychiatric practice in Texas, though "due to soon be deployed in Afghanistan." The explanation for his shooting rampage, put forth by the media, was communicated within his Internet blog postings, where he voiced his opposition to war in the Middle East. We have yet to hear, firsthand, Hasan's opinions on the matter, though.

Major Hasan's secret identities
Following an intuitive hunch, the author suspected the "Malik" name was an alias, and if so, the aliases found in various databases might reveal the real identities of the "Hasan" clan. Inconsistencies in the spelling of Nidal's name hinted of a coverup.

One article published by huffingtonpost.com referred to the Ft. Hood shooter as "Malik Nadal Hasan" [sic.], and yet another referred to his birth name as "Abduwali Malik Hasan." Genealogical searches under those names were fruitless, though aliases, relatives, and associates provided clues to "Nidal Malik Hasan's" true identity.

An alleged relative/associate of Nidal Malik Hasan is "Ali Zein" (alternately "Elzein," "El-Zein," "El Zein," "Al-Zein," "Al Zein," "Zain," "Al Zain," "Mozain," and "Al Reda"). These aliases lead to photos and vocational descriptions in information technology fields, including computer software design, computer electronics, and state-of-the-art cell phone batteries, to name a few. The aliases also reveal that "Major Nidal Malik Hasan" was the least publicized of several personalities advertised on various web sites.

Following the "Ali Zein" lead, court documentation of divorce proceedings and subsequent appeals revealed the likely identities of Hasan's (aka Ali Zein) parents, "Ezzat M. Zein," and "Nora H. (Burgan) Zein." A summary of the case revealed "hidden assets," i.e. "the sale of a restaurant and undeclared annual payments," received and unreported by Ezzat Zein, in the amount of $36,000. Nora Zein was seeking an amendment to the original divorce decree based upon those discovered assets. Ezzat was seeking relief from child support for one of his three children who had recently turned age 18. The "Hasans," coincidentally, also had three children.

The number of known aliases are too numerous for the purpose of discussion. However, addresses in Washington, D.C.; Herndon, Falls Church, Fairfax, Alexandria, Vinton, and Roanoke, VA; Stone Mountain, GA; and others in TX, IA, MO, FL and CA match those belonging to the Hasans. Conveniently, there are no photos of Malik and Hanan Hasan, though their aliases reveal a few surprises. Ali Zein provided ample glue to assist us in connecting the dots.

The significance of the "Malik" name relates to previously unknown investment companies which share common locations with the aforementioned aliases. International Currency Review publisher/editor Christopher Story recently revealed the "Malik" dimension as it relates to international money laundering and the financial conduits which fund al-Queda, a CIA-sponsored terrorist network.

In a November 10th, 2009 (www.worldreports.org) article, "Barack Obama Faces Veterans' Day Deadline to Comply,” Story wrote:

"The Malik trail identifies the following linkages: Malik Investments Inc., Carrollton, Texas; Malik Investments Llc., Charlotte, NC; Malik Investments Inc., Stone Mountain, GA; Ilyas Malik, Chief Manager, Habib Bank, Zurich (previously Branch Manager at the Baker Street branch, London); Malik Management Zentrum, St. Gallen Seminare AG; Malik Enterprise, based at Anaheim, CA; Malik Enterprises Llc., Key Biscayne, FL; Malik Holdings Inc., Oxon Hill, MD; Malik Trading Corporation, Madison GA; Malik's Corporation, Washington DC."

Concurrent with I/O findings, most of the (above) locations mirror those found in conjunction with the Hasan/Zein/El Zein aliases and their various spellings. Houses, apartment complexes, condominiums, shopping plazas, malls, office buildings, restaurants, grocery stores, motels, hotels, realtors, and banks are among the typical money-laundering vehicles used to funnel funds into al-Queda cells.

Nidal Malik Hasan: The alter egos of a 'patsy'
Using Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, and other Internet social databases, MK-ULTRA figures post photographs and other biographical information which reveal their associations and/or ties to organized crime. "Nidal Malik Hasan" did not post his image or name in such databases, though his handlers and the media did that on his behalf. Hasan's aliases reveal a network of 'friends' (operatives) who are associated with each of his alter egos. The alter egos, identified by aliases and accompanying photos, perform various missions or are associated with specific financial transactions.

Hasan's alleged original first name is "Abduwali," (abbreviated "Ali.") and "Abdullah" when referencing some of his aliases. It should also be noted that his email address is "abduwali.hasan@us.army.mil." Based on the information found in his parents' divorce transcripts, his official last name would be "Zein" and/or any of his chosen variations. (See below)

Abdullah Ahmed Al Mozain (Jordan) Major (Abduwali) Nidal Malik Hasan

Ali El-Zein Ali Al Reda

Since Malik and Hanan Hasan are aliases, Nidal Malik Hasan's name is an alias intended to hide his true identity. The parents 'died', allowing them to assume their undercover identities. So why would "Nidal Malik Hasan" have been the chosen 'patsy' for a false-flag event at Ft. Hood? 'Malik' refers to the tax-free real estate investment companies used to finance terrorist activities, both in the U.S. and abroad. Banking scams, hypothecated derivatives/hedge funds, real estate foreclosures/transfers/sales, and drug smuggling also finance highly organized terrorist organizations and their activities.

Ft. Hood: Behind the veiled curtain
In direct conflict with claims that the Hasan family was from Palestine, Texas Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison stated that the Hasans "were from Jordan." What did she know about Hasan that led her to make such a claim? The significance of that statement is directly related to what really occurred at Ft. Hood, behind the chaos of mass murder and automatic weapons fire.

British financial analyst Christopher Story alluded to George W. and Laura Bush's secret visit to Ft. Hood shortly after the shootings. Bush had asked for anonymity, though a Los Angeles Times photo spread and story depicted the Bushes consoling the bereaved families of shooting victims. It was later learned, according to Story's financial intelligence updates, that George H.W. Bush was seen at the base as well.

Those visits, according to Story's intelligence sources, were related to the orchestrated theft of "Chinese Boxes" stored at the base near the airstrip. The boxes contained bank notes (Series 1933-1934), gold, and other valuables, all collateralised by 10,000 tons of gold, given to the U.S. by China, in order to establish a new currency in Iraq post-Saddam Hussein. The boxes were originally shipped to — you guessed it — Jordan — some 15 years ago. Once waylaid, the 55 pallets of stolen loot were surreptitiously returned to Ft. Hood, where they remained until November 5, 2009.

The shootings provided the necessary diversion to draw attention away from the heist underway at the airstrip. Helicopters flying overhead added to the noise level, thereby masking the sound of a C-130 transport plane which was seen taking off during the confusion — with some or all of the 55 pallets — less noticable. Story concluded that Chinese secret service agents intercepted the delivery at an unnamed location, thus, retrieving their stolen property.

Previous reports had Bush 41 at high-level meetings in Germany, while Angela Merkel signed financial documents in Washington, D.C. It was speculated that Bush would likely sabotage any agreements by colluding with associates at Deutschebank in Germany. It was later learned that both Bush 41 and 43 had made the trip to Killeen, TX, obviously to monitor financial activities. The secrecy was requested to prevent Bush's partners in crime, Bill and Hillary Clinton, from learning of the heist. The news reached the Clintons, causing a rift in their embezzlement partnership.

Blowback from Operation "Malik"
The media spin surrounding the Ft. Hood shootings is designed to hoodwink the unwary while fomenting further anti-Muslim hatred. It is apparent that "Nidal Malik Hasan" (aka Ali Zein) was specially chosen for the role he played as a crazed gunman intent on avoiding deployment to Afghanistan. Whether he was aware of his actions, or not, depends on the level of MK-ULTRA mind control he received at Virginia Tech, the underground base at Blacksburg, VA, or at the WRAMC in Bethesda, MD. For the time being, he will remain the patsy. Web postings attributed to him were likely planted by intelligence operatives in order to establish a pretext for his actions. We have yet to hear his account of the events on November 5, 2009.

The CIA/Mossad connections of the "Hasan" clan are obvious when following the trail of real estate fraud and money laundering. Both organizations are the co-creators of al-Queda, and their newly-acquired wealth may very likely have been intended to finance an attack on Iran.

Now that the cat is out of the bag, what false-flag event will they plan next? Based on these revelations, the inevitable blowback will likely result in a 'return to sender'. Stay tuned for further updates....

© 2009 By Don Nicoloff / The Idaho Observer

directlightproductions.com

Dr. Orly Taitz' Federal Lawsuits Exposed to the "Flu Pandemic"

Tue, 4 Aug 2009 19:45:04 -0400

August 4, 2009

By Don Nicoloff
http://directlightproductions.com

The Obama citizenship-eligibility lawsuits filed by Dr. Orly Taitz, DDS in the U.S. Supreme Court have suddenly become stricken by the bird/swine/human flu "pandemic."

Taitz recently released a facsimile of Obama's alleged Kenyan "Certified Copy of Registration of Life Birth" to WorldNetDaily.

WND's article, "Is this really smoking gun of Obama's Kenyan birth?," (http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=105764#, August 2, 2009) shows three photographic representations of the birth document. The document, itself, is obviously fraudulent, though Taitz claims to have filed a motion in U.S. District Court to determine its authenticity. The source of the document and how it was obtained by Dr. Taitz was not disclosed, though it was implied that its sender, a Kenyan citizen, "feared for his life."

Taitz, a practicing dentist, attorney, and licensed real estate agent who lives in Southern California's posh, coastline community, Mission Viejo, has filed numerous lawsuits and legal motions on behalf of former U.S. Senate candidate Alan Keyes (and others) demanding proof of Barack Hussein Obama, Jr.'s (aka Barry Soetoro, et al) citizenship eligibility to serve as president of the United States. Taitz recently published 'proof' that she had standing to practice law before the U.S. Supreme Court and claims to have "met personally" with Chief Justice John Roberts.

On recent radio shows across the U.S., Taitz disclosed "death threats" and "attempts on her life and that of her husband," Yosef Taitz, alluding to "tampering with critical systems" on the couple's automobiles. Taitz has also given numerous accounts of Internet blog-site attacks and other such types of interference.

Yosef Taitz is the self-described "CEO" of Daylight Chemical Information Systems, Inc., a private software company located in Mission Viejo, CA, Santa Fe, NM, and Cambridge, England. DCIS, Inc. is intimately involved with Novartis Pharmaceuticals (United States, Switzerland, Germany, France, England), the patent holder of the bird/swine flu vaccination. The "DayCart" software produced by DCIS, Inc. integrates ongoing research and development by Novartis and others using proprietary Oracle 8i technologies.

The following Internet posting reveals Yosef Taitz' relationship with Novartis Pharmaceuticals, manufacturer of the H1N1 (Influenza A) vaccine:

http://chemport.ipe.ac.cn/cgi-bin/chemport/getfiler.cgi?ID=ChmYwAHaYyWYUq3HlOMGPUWGlcVo9W34GYXMM6nkdJUN1Ths35rJve1CPnEXyUTC&VER=C

DAYLIGHT CIS announces DayCart
【新闻主要内容】  DAYLIGHT CIS, Inc.  Contact: Yosef Taitz DAYLIGHT Chemical Information Systems Tel: +1-949.367.9990 Fax: +1-949.367.0990 Email: yosi@daylight.com www.daylight.com  DayCart(tm) introduced by DAYLIGHT  Mission Viejo, Calif. USA - July 14, 2000 -- DAYLIGHT Chemical Information Systems, Inc. (USA) today introduces a new addition to the array of DAYLIGHT software products; DayCart(tm), an application using the unique extensibility features of Oracle8i(tm) designed to fully integrate the molecular structures and reactions in an Oracle8i database server environment. As an integrated module DayCart does not require any call-outs or other operations outside of the Oracle server, in order to perform its functions. DayCart delivers the speed, capacity and performance of Daylight tools throughout the organization. Use of DayCart with the Oracle8i server, unlocks the access of existing Oracle* applications and tools (such as SQL,PL/SQL, Java, C, etc.) to the array of chemical information.  "DayCart was developed in close collaboration with Novartis' scientists and the architects of Oracle8i's extensibility framework. Thus, DayCart provides a practical and exceptionally efficient solution fully compliant with Oracle technology. Today DayCart delivers an extensive range of chemical information capabilities, such as fast direct storage and retrieval of 2D and 3D, structures, reactions and mixtures. Operations provided include high performance searching of full structure, sub-structure, super-structure, similarity and other structural operations. Our utilization of Unique SMILES and its indexing, delivers unparalleled speed and flexibility in storing, novelty checking and searching operations," stated Yosef Taitz, Chief Executive Officer of DAYLIGHT. "Utilizing the DayCart technology today, we deliver a corporate compound registration system handling archival, searching and retrieval of over 9 million compounds with lightning speed. A wide range of DayCart solutions are being produced, both by Daylight and by its development partners. We are providing a migration path for conversion and integration of existing data. Daylight chemical technology, tightly integrated with the Oracle8i database opens the door to groundbreaking 'informatics' solutions. This technology empowers users to bridge and expand the horizons of chemical information science, merge biological and chemical data, and provide solutions for data warehousing, compound acquisition, and more."  "The Oracle database is unique in its ability to singularly store, manage and secure relational data, files and unstructured data," said Jeremy Burton, senior vice president of iPlatform marketing, Oracle Corp. "By extending these data management capabilities, as DAYLIGHT Chemical Information Systems has with DayCart, technology continues to drive significant business and scientific advances. We are pleased to be a fundamental part of these advances."  "The Daylight Cartridge combines strong performance with interesting versatility through Daylight's typical toolkit approach. It enables Pharma R&D IT functions to adapt their systems flexibly to the new challenges in the business and scientific environments." Said Dr. Rene Ziegler the Head of Pharma Research Information Management at Novartis.  “DAYLIGHT Chemical Information Systems, incorporated in 1987, is a privately held company headquartered in Mission Viejo, CA, with a research office in Santa Fe, NM and in Cambridge England. DAYLIGHT is a technology leader who provides high-performance chemical information processing tools (such as SMILES and Daylight ToolKit(tm)) for research chemists around the globe. Its software and tools are used by thousands of scientists at over 250 companies worldwide. For more information please e-mail to: info@daylight.com and visit DAYLIGHT's homepage at www.daylight.com”
【相关链接】  　　Daylight Chemical Information Systems, Inc (结构信息处理、化学信息系统开发环境)

Summary by 李晓霞 on 2000-07-13
Last updated by 李晓霞 on 2000-07-13

Over the past year, we were suspicious of the unusual course Dr. Taitz' lawsuit was taking. As events unfolded, it became increasingly apparent that the "Hawaiian-Kenyan birth" myth was employed as a means of dividing the American people through a dialectical argument over two lies. Our research has revealed innumerable facts that dispel the myth of Barack Hussein Obama, Jr.'s (aka Barry Soetoro, et al) birthplace, documentation, and family photographs.

On a hunch, it seemed appropriate to investigate Dr. Taitz' husband, Yosef Taitz, in order to see where he might lead us. As a matter of fact, he led us straight to the (WHO/UN-sponsored) H1N1/H5N1 bird/swine/human flu "pandemic."

© 2009 Don Nicoloff/Direct Light Productions

http://directlightproductions.com

A printable version of this article is available here.

The Three Stooges go to Washington, Part 7-B

Sat, 18 Jul 2009 20:05:30 -0400

Barack Obama: Who's your daddy?

By Don Nicoloff

July 18, 2009 [Continued from Part 7-A]

Photo 4-D, Reporters Arrive on-the-Scene, Cameras in Tow

Make no mistake about it — the Rockefellers have controlled the media for 150 years, and they were in control of it here. Their arrival at the accident scene, more than 20 miles at sea, is as implausible as the story they documented on film. Did they not notice their own proximity to the shore line of Papua, New Guinea? Even the cameraman in the foreground could swim to the shore, if required.

Photo 4-E, Rene Wassing Describes His Attempts to Convince Michael Rockefeller Not to Swim For Shore

Rene Wassing parrots the cover story for Michael C. Rockefeller's disappearance to media stooges. Notice that moments after being plucked from an ocean with no name, Wassing's hair, face, body, and clothes are bone-dry. Notice that "22 hours at sea" had no affect on his 5 o'clock shadow and probably put his facial hair in a state of suspended animation. His shirt still buttoned and his collar still creased, Wassing delivers the message which permitted Rockefeller to evaporate into obscurity.

Photo 4-F, Dutch Chopper Begins 'Emergency Search' for Michael C. Rockefeller

Upon the official announcement of Rene Wassing's miraculous rescue, a Bell helicopter signals the official search for the still-missing Michael Rockefeller, according to actor Leonard Nimoy's carefully-prepared narrative. The image above, along with script, is intended to legitimize the ruse that Rockefeller was missing.

Seen onboard a boat after the rescue, a clean-shaven — and bone-dry — Rene Wassing parroted the "I-think-I-can-make-it" mantra that excused Michael's mysterious disappearance. Of course, Nimoy's narration overshadowed whatever audio might have been heard. The viewing audience was conveniently deprived of hearing Wassing's firsthand account verbatim, and the original audio, if it existed, was muted in favor of Star Trek's Vulcan hero, "Mr. Spock." The obligatory media parasites were gathered in a Hollywood-style semi-circle which faced Wassing, pointing their cameras and waving microphones in his visage, all a spectacle for the film crew that captured the event on black and white film.

A photograph of Rene Wassing (below), smoking a cigarette and wearing the same bone-dry clothes while riding in another canoe (piloted by the now-obligatory New Guinea natives) was also inserted into the film to feign an alibi. The last thing a shipwreck survivor will request is a cigarette. Yet, there was Wassing, balancing a half-smoked cigarette between his lips, extended ash still clinging onto the unburned portion, as if for its own survival.

Photo 4-G, Mission Accomplished, Rene Wassing Enjoys a Puff in a Canoe After "22-Straight Hours" of Gulping Down Ocean Water

Rene Wassing puffs on a cigarette, shortly after having been rescued by the Royal Dutch Navy on November 19, 1961. Is the photo, itself, a fraud. No, but the pretext under which is was taken is. Consider that Wassing was picked up more than 20 miles at sea. We were not told what sea that was, but we can contemplate that the story is a hoax on the basis of what we see in this photograph. Photos 4A-D and 4F-G, reveal land in the immediate vicinity. Are we expected to disregard that small detail, while assuming that the native steering the rescue canoe is completing the return leg of a 40-mile rescue cruise?

An expanded account, theorized within the "in Search of" piece, described the research of celebrated journalist/magazine editor Milt Machlin's unsolicited search for Michael Rockefeller, but contradicts much of the original story and was as equally-staged as the Asmat ruse. Rockefeller allegedly made previous art-gathering trips to Indonesia, prior to his involvement with Dead Birds. In addition, Nimoy's narration specifically implied that Michael Rockefeller immediately left the filming of the movie to collect his prepaid art treasures created by the Asmat artisans. How and where did he arrange to meet Rene Wassing, who is not seen in any of the Dead Birds photos?

[It may be a mere coincidence, but the release date and the legal declaration of Michael C. Rockefeller's death both occurred in 1964. With the Rockefellers, there are no coincidences. The film was likely shot after his alleged disappearance, and was held in abeyance until it was determined that the public's consciousness had sufficiently abated.]

Seven years after Rockefeller's disappearance, a sailor and stranger, identifying himself only as "Donahue," walked into Machlin's New York publishing office, proclaiming he had run into Michael Rockefeller about ten weeks earlier. The messenger quoted the missing heir, who approached him saying, "My name is Michael Rockefeller. Please help me."

Machlin set out to discover whether there was any truth to the story, first, by seeking out a tribe called the "Trobriands,” where he spoke to a chief who provided him with information leading to his eventually locating a tiny island, "Kanapu," (pronounced, "Can-o'-poo!"), where Rockefeller was rumored to be living. Captured on film, Machlin momentarily peeped into an abandoned hut near the island's beach, then walked away as Nimoy's narration (from the Pamasanoff script) concluded that Michael Rockefeller never reached the island. The conclusion was obviously melodramatic — reminiscent of today's media propaganda.

The viewer learned nothing about the inhabitants of the island (which, by the way, resembled the opening shot from "Gilligan's Island," a CBS television show), beyond the singular peek into the immaculate, but abandoned hut.

Alex Pamasanoff had also produced a few specials for CBS, ABC, National Geographic, and the sensationalistic dud which revealed the empty vault purported to have belonged to Al Capone, narrated by then-ABC field reporter, Geraldo Rivera. It appears that Pamasanoff, under the alias of on “Alex Gregory,” writes political/social cartoons for New Yorker magazine and others, that is, if this research is correct. The description, story, and map of Kanapu was not very accurate, and was more of the now-familiar obfuscation. Machlin's role appeared to be one of an intentional disinformation agent, or someone simply fooled by one. [See below.]

Photo 5-A, Milt Machlin Locates the Non-locatable "Trobriands"

Following clues given to him by a total stranger, Milt Machlin reaches the village of the "Trobriands" in New Guinea to ask for driving directions to Kanapu Island. This location, if it were a real, identifiable place, might have been near the SE tip of Papua, in the vicinity of Port Moresby. It could have just as easily been staged at a Hollywood movie set. Macklin changes his wardrobe before the next shot, implying that time has passed since this scene. Funny, but this author could not locate the specific "village of the Trobriands." Neither can anyone else.

Conclusion: Bogus story. Still, someone paid for Macklin's trip. [See below.]

Photo 5-B, Milt Machlin: 'Quick-Change Artist' Meets the "Trobriands"

Milt Machlin jots down a few notes from a "village of the Trobriands" tribal leader (which one?) familiar with the location of Kanapu Island, rumored hideaway of Michael Rockefeller, in 1968. Writing it down makes it seem more realistic, which is the intention here.

Notice that Machlin has changed his clothes, is clean-shaven, and is wearing a teal-blue shirt, moments after his arrival.

Photo 5-C, Milt Machlin's Kanapu Island Map

Above is a Google Earth satellite map of Kanapu Island, just off the SE coast of Papua, New Guinea. Kanapu Island is the 2nd island from the left. Though the satellite images show more detail, the actual shape and size of the island appears to be different from that shown in image above. It is likely that the north western tip is the only part visible by sailing.

Photo 5-E, Map of Papua, New Guinea

The map above is self-explanatory and should give the reader a perspective of the general areas discussed within this article. Areas covered by clouds do not change until pictures are updated. The clouds in these types of images are airbrushed into the photos to hide specific details that can be seen from satellites.

Photo 5-F, Milt Machlin's Binoculars Spot Kanapu Island

If the interpretation of the satellite map (in Photo 5-D) is correct, we are looking at the NW tip of Kanapu Island. The majority of the island is underwater. Machlin appears to be looking for signs of life, or at least, one would hope so.

Photo 5-G, Milt Machlin Points To Kanapu Island (for the Binocular-Deprived)

Here we see journalist and publishing editor Milt Machlin pointing (for the camera) in the direction of Kanapu Island, the possible hideout of the future heir to the Rockefeller $billions, Michael C. Rockefeller. This shot (extracted from the "in Search of" TV program) creates a sense of urgency, what the producers likely wanted us to feel. If Machlin's story was genuine, his excitement was warranted.

Photo 5-H, Milt Machlin's Close-Up Shot of Kanapu Island

This photo (R) represents a close-up shot of "Kanapu Island," near Papua, New Guinea, as seen from Milt Machlin’s chartered boat in the “in Search of” Michael Rockefeller video.

Here, Kanapu Island looks remarkably similar to "Gilligan's Island" of CBS-TV fame. From this perspective, it is apparent that there are a few mountains (or large hills).

Photographic comparisons will cast doubt on the Milt Machlin dimension of this investigation.

Photo 5-I, "Gilligan's Island" TV-Show Logo

This photo of the “Gilligan’s Island” logo is strikingly similar to the Kanapu Island shot seen in Photo 5-H (above).

Was Kanapu Island really just a view of Gilligan’s Island from a different perspective? Seen from another angle, it very well may have been.

Photo 5-J, "Gilligan's Island" From The Air

Some speculate that this is the real Gilligan's Island, somewhere off the California coast. The TV shots in the CBS show were filmed on a Hollywood studio set, unless the script called for more detailed shots.

Photo 5-K, The Real Kanapu Island

A more recent photographic representation of Kanapu Island, New Guinea looks remarkably different from the one seen in Photo 5-H above. What happened to the mountains seen in a few of the other photos? Was the Machlin dimension of the story an entire hoax intended to reinforce the original story? This photo suggests that it was.

Overall, the "in Search of" episode appeared to capitalize on the tragic side of Michael C. Rockefeller's disappearance and possible demise, though this author was left with the haunting suspicion that a major coverup was, and is, still underway. The inclusion of Nelson Rockefeller's filmed press-conference announcements did little to dispel this perception. In fact, though he referred to his missing son in the past tense, with statements like, "Michael was doing something he deeply loved," there was an unnatural lack of genuine sadness behind the words. Nelson's facial expressions were not commensurate with the tone of his soliloquy, nor with his general demeanor. If anything, it appeared as though Nelson Rockefeller lamented the fact that his son was destined to remain a non-person, forever severed from the public spotlight. A final decision had been made to turn his son into a CIA spook, and he was obviously uncomfortable with such a prospect.

Many will argue that there exists no predictable way that one will (or should) mourn the loss of a loved one. That may be true, though death is a topic not unfamiliar to the Rockefellers. History proves that they routinely go to great lengths in planning for the deaths of millions throughout the planet. In Michael C. Rockefeller's case, it appears that the lack of any emotion betrayed the pretension of his passing. The author is not entirely alone in arriving at this conclusion, and so, makes no apologies. The evidence that follows will clarify that position.

Michael Clark Rockefeller: An anthropological study
Family photos of Michael C. Rockefeller available on the Internet are few. However, there are a couple with his older brother and at least one with his entire family that this author has found. The majority of the other photos are fabricated, either through the Photoshop technique of layering, or by the insertion of a confederate — whether a look-alike, a body double, or a clone. Without exception, the photos representing his having been in Papua, New Guinea with the Dead Birds film crew have been faked.

As is the case with all of the photos we have examined within this series, Rockefeller's photos have not escaped a similar fate through compilation, layering, disguises, and anachronistic props. His New York suit-and-tie photos appear to be genuine, with a few exceptions. But we can be assured we have a general idea of what Michael C. Rockefeller looked like before he went missing in 1961. Those photos will be used as the benchmark in determining which photos are fraudulent.

Photo 7-A, Michael C. Rockefeller, The Businessman

Michael C. Rockefeller disappeared on or about November 18, 1961. The photo above, originally published in LIFE magazine, is one which appears to be genuine. Of course, the photo has the watermark of the magazine, added via computer. The magazine's logo originally consisted of white letters within a red rectangle. This photo provides the reader with an opportunity to study his facial features for further comparison. Notice how Rockefeller's chin extends beyond the vertical plane of his lips. Likewise, notice his nose is slightly upturned, somewhat meaty, especially around the nostrils, and that it extends past the vertical plane of his lips, meeting the vertical plane of his chin. With his head held in an erect, balanced position, the back of his ears are angled at approximately 45 degrees. His ear lobes are attached, meaning that they do not hang down excessively from the cartilage portion of the ear. Note that his hairline had considerably receded before he had aged 23. Note the dark frames around his eyeglasses, and the general shape and contour of his forehead and hands. Also note how the lenses of his glasses are tilted outward from the top of the frame. Now, compare these features to those in Photo 2, and it will become immediately apparent that these are not both photos of the same Michael C. Rockefeller, nor of the same person.

Photo 6-B, "Michael's Head Straightened" For Comparison

The previously-tilted head of Michael C. Rockefeller (in Photos 2-A & B) has been straightened by the author to view a shorter chin which ends behind the vertical line leading upward to the lips, and a nose which hangs lower than in previous photos. The top of the left ear begins above his eyebrow. In Photo 6-A, his ear reaches a height even with his eye, but beneath the eyebrow. Notice that the angle of the back of the ear is smaller, here, by at least 20 degrees. Note that his hair is parted on the right side of his head, as in previous photos. Also note that there are no significant marks on his neck. The contrast has not been adjusted here and is still in its original form.

Photo 6-C, "Michael Rows The Boat Ashore"

In segment one of "in Search of" Michael Rockefeller, we see (within a few video frames) a photograph of Michael Rockefeller steering the rudder of an outboard motor powering a small fishing boat. What is important here are the unusual shadows that obscure his face and arms but do not remain consistent. Notice how his left arm is completely consumed by a shadow, yet his left hand looks more like a white rag is wrapped around the rudder handle. This photo appears to have had its color removed, though his right hand still maintains a natural-colored skin tone past his wrist. Because of the excessive manipulation of contrast and color, the wake behind the boat is reflecting too much light, while casting shadows upon itself on both sides of the shallow waves. Look closely at his nose, and you will see how it is pushed toward the right side of his face, especially near the nostrils. The height and angle of his right ear seem fine, but upon close inspection, his left ear appears to top out at the height of his cheekbone. This photo is fraudulent and was likely edited on or near the porch in Photo 1-A! It is intended to obfuscate the truth, while tauntingly parading its deceptive abnormalities right under our noses.

Photo 6-D, "Michael Rows The Boat Away From The Shore"

In the 2nd segment of "in Search of "Michael Rockefeller, billionaire Nelson A. Rockefeller's son reappeared (L) after magazine editor Milt Machlin's failed attempt to find him. Though this photo is intentionally washed out, one can see Rockefeller's dark hair reflecting bright sunlight. His glasses do not look very natural as they reflect light from the front, and his right arm, facing the same light, suffers from Splotchy-Shadow Disease. The top of the left ear is now below the eyeball, and the right ear, which is almost totally obscured, is even lower. Look carefully at the nose, which is now somewhat bulbous and bends toward the left side of his face. One might argue that this photo was the result of a reversed negative. It may have been, but there are still a few more abnormalities to sort out. There is a dark mole on the left side of his neck, near the T-shirt collar, and 4-5 cyst-like growths on his throat and collarbone. Note that the water has just about disappeared from view. See anything else? How about this?: His hair is now parted on the left side of his head, and the left-side bald spot has grown by several inches. Considering the extent of photographic manipulation and the resultant visible abnormalities, someone should have been able to immediately spot these peculiarities. The Marxist-Hegelian dialectic did not concern itself about getting caught in this deception —it arrogantly and pridefully thrives upon such practices. The prime objective here was to fake Michael Rockefeller's death and cause the world to believe the hoax was a real event. It mattered not where he was. The ultimate goal of the Rockefellers was to deceive the world, while awaiting the manifestation of their ingenious, but most-diabolical plan to overtake their most powerful rivals.

Photo 6-E, Michael Meets The 'Wolfman'

What can anyone say about this photo? It is beyond comprehension that this ridiculous image is to be seriously considered as that of Michael C. Rockefeller. Lon Chaney's tormented 'Wolfman' character was mimicked in dozens of Hollywood movies, though this one takes the cake. You, the reader, are encouraged to do your own analysis after considering the ear peaks below eye level, the nose, forehead, cheeks and neck are teeming with 'growths', and the beard could easily double as a toupé for certain follicle-deprived TV evangelists. Oh, by the way, the hair is parted on the wrong side and the eyes look like they belong to a New Guinea gecko, especially the left one.

Photo 6-F, A Real-life Photo of Michael C. Rockefeller

Michael Rockefeller's nose was on straight in this photo, and we can clearly see that his ears top out at a level midway between his eyes and his eyebrows. Any other deviation from this representation is indicative of fraud.

Why would anyone fake a photo of Michael C. Rockefeller? Really, why would that have to be done? He is the son of a multi-billionaire, worshipped and respected by the central banksters and socialites throughout the world, and the eventual heir to a fortune amassed over the past 150 years — one of the largest on Planet Earth. Why would anyone walk away from, risk losing, or forfeit such a certain future? It makes no sense, unless one considers that he might have committed the one, single faux-pas of his heritage — siring offspring outside of his race. Did Michael C. Rockefeller do just that? Probably not. At least, not intentionally. If not, then he likely did not walk away or drown, either.

So, what could have been the real reason for his disappearance? Might it have been the role he was chosen to play, in a pre-planned, mystical, or symbolic extension of the family's bloodline? Possibly, though we would need more evidence to be certain. Is it possible the proof has been right before our very eyes all along? Yes, it is.

Most people will agree that we can easily recognize others by their face, hair, eyes, smile, or some other unique characteristic. When determining whether or not we are seeing a genuine representation of any person, it is logical to compare the eyes, the shape and size of their skull, nose, mouth, ears, forehead, hairline, and chin. Without having seen the individual ourselves or in person, we rely heavily on photographic representations and the experiences of others. We have seen many more (fraudulent) photos of Michael Rockefeller allegedly 'taken' in New Guinea than we have of those taken in the U.S., yet they are significantly different from each other in a variety of ways. We might also rely on the firsthand accounts of others, due to the immensity of international collusion involved. The following article is such an example:

The First Time I Heard Of Barack
By Tom Fife
11-20-8

During the period of roughly February 1992 to mid 1994, I was making frequent trips to Moscow, Russia, in the process of starting a software development joint-venture company with some people from the Russian scientific community. One of the men in charge on the Russian side was named V. M.; he had a wife named T.M.

V. was a level-headed scientist while his wife was rather deeply committed to the losing Communist cause - a cause she obviously was not abandoning.

One evening, during a trip early in 1992, the American half of our venture were invited to V. & T.'s Moscow flat as we were about to return to the States. The party went well and we had the normal dinner discussions.

As the evening wore on, T. developed a decidedly rough anti-American edge - one her husband tried to quietly rein in.

The bottom line of the tirade she started against the United States went something like this:

"You Americans always like to think that you have the perfect government and your people are always so perfect. Well then, why haven't you had a woman president by now? You had a chance to vote for a woman vice-president and you didn't do it."

The general response went something along the lines that you don't vote for someone just because of their sex. Besides, you don't vote for vice-president, but the president and vice-president as a ticket.

"Well, I think you are going to be surprised when you get a black president very soon."

The consensus we expressed was that we didn't think there was anything innately barring that. The right person at the right time and sure, America would try to vote for the right person, be he or she black or not.

"What if I told you that you will have a black president very soon and he will be a Communist?"

The out-of-the-blue remark was met by our stares. She continued, "Well, you will; and he will be a Communist."

It was then that the husband unsuccessfully tried to change the subject; but she was on a roll and would have nothing of it. One of us asked, "It sounds like you know something we don't know."

"Yes, it is true. This is not some idle talk. He is already born and he is educated and being groomed to be president right now. You will be impressed to know that he has gone to the best schools of Presidents. He is what you call "Ivy League". You don't believe me, but he is real and I even know his name. His name is Barack. His mother is white and American and his father is black from Africa. That's right, a chocolate baby! And he's going to be your President."

She became more and more smug as she presented her stream of detailed knowledge and predictions so matter-of-factly - as though all were foregone conclusions. "It's all been thought out. His father is not an American black so he won't have that social slave stigma. He is intelligent and he is half white and has been raised from the cradle to be an atheist and a Communist. He's gone to the finest schools. He is being guided every step of the way and he will be irresistible to America."

We sat there not knowing what to say. She was obviously very happy that the Communists were doing this and that it would somehow be a thumbing of their collective noses at America: they would give us a black president and he'd be a Communist to boot. She made it quite obvious that she thought that this was going to breathe new life into world Communism. From this and other conversations with her, she always asserted that Communism was far from dead.

She was full of little details about him that she was eager to relate. I thought that maybe she was trying to show off that this truly was a real person and not just hot air.

She rattled off a complete litany. He was from Hawaii. He went to school in California. He lived in Chicago. He was soon to be elected to the legislature. "Have no doubt: he is one of us, a Soviet."

At one point, she related some sort of San Francisco connection, but I didn't understand what the point was and don't recall much about that. I was just left with the notion that she considered the city to be some sort of a center for their activity here.

Since I had dabbled in languages, I knew a smattering of Arabic. I made a comment: "If I remember correctly, 'Barack' comes from the Arabic word for 'Blessing.' That seems to be an odd name for an American." She replied quickly, "Yes. It is 'African'", she insisted, "and he will be a blessing for world Communism. We will regain our strength and become the number one power in the world."

She continued with something to the effect that America was at the same time the great hope and the great obstacle for Communism. America would have to be converted to Communism and Barack was going to pave the way.

So, what does this conversation from 1992 prove?

Well, it's definitely anecdotal. It doesn't prove that Obama has had Soviet Communist training nor that he was groomed to be the first black American president, but it does show one thing that I think is very important. It shows that Soviet Russian Communists knew of Barack from a very early date. It also shows that they truly believed among themselves that he was raised and groomed Communist to pave the way for their future. This report on Barack came personally to me from one of them long before America knew he existed.

Although I had never before heard of him, at the time of this conversation Obama was 30+ years old and was obviously tested enough that he was their anticipated rising star.

Tom Fife

(Republished by permission © http://rense.com and Tom Fife)

The reality of a rumor
The observations and disclosures of author Tom Fife were made regarding an incident that occurred some seventeen years ago. His statements are politically unbiased and void of vitriol. Mr. Fife would have no reason to lie, nor to allude to anything outside of his experience. But his experience mirrors the identical conclusions at which this author has independently arrived — long before he had ever heard of Tom Fife.

Tom Fife's revelations raise a number of questions. How is it that a Russian software engineer's wife came to learn about Barack before we did? Why was it common knowledge in Russian political circles that he was being groomed for the U.S. presidency? What knowledge did T.M. have that caused her to be so absolutely certain she knew what was to occur within the political future of the United States? Did she know something more about his real family or about his whereabouts? The questions are endless. We can authoritatively conclude that certain people within the hallowed circles of international influence and corruption were apprised of a fact made known to a select few, and T.M. was one of them.

Certainly, we can deduce that these revelations have nothing to do with the fictitious Dunham clan, nor that of the Kenyan Obama clan. Who would have been connected to the Russian elite in 1992? The Rockefellers.

The Rockefeller plan in a nutshell
In retrospect, the period from 1945-47 signaled a turning point in the future freedoms of America and its people. The Industrial Age, now in full swing and on the heels of World War II, became the focal point of its central banks, its corporate and political task masters, and the military/industrial complex, both current and future. The former OSS had smoothly made its semi-secret metamorphosis into the CIA, and thanks to the successful lies that permitted Operation Paper Clip to occur, the U.S. was infiltrated by literally thousands of spies, under the pretext of scientific advancement.

The stories of Stanley Armour and Madelyn Dunham are just elements of the same misdirection. Their roles facilitated corruption, and having performed their assignments to the satisfaction of their masters, they were selected, as surrogates, to be the progenitors of the one who was destined to revive Communism. The Dunhams were financed by the Rockefellers, and so, they belonged to the Rockefellers. It was no accident that Madelyn worked for an offshore bank, or that their daughter, a surrogate in her own right, was their Southeast Asian liaison.

The Rockefellers' worldwide financial interests were cloaked in secrecy but were well known to the international military/industrial complex. Their massive wealth had been garnered through the systematic plunder and control of the world's resources. The Rockefellers and their Illuminist cohorts secretly plotted to contrive future wars as a means of creating even greater profits and gaining more power.

Operating in secrecy, the Rockefellers' enlisted agents to do their bidding, while hiding behind the veil of their innumerable banks, foundations, and charitable organizations. The United Nations gave them instant access to international politics and facilitated their capacity to bribe foreign diplomats. The Dunhams, themselves, were only a microscopic segment of a larger plan — a Marxist plot to overthrow the U.S. Constitution and the government of the United States.

The intentional destruction of their World Trade Center complex, on September 11, 2001, was the event that heralded the grand entrance of their New World Order, though they blamed it on box-cutter-wielding Arab high-jackers — a ruse that still bears the Rockefellers' Zionist signature.

Due to intelligence-agency disinformation, propaganda, and control of the mainstream media, Americans would be impervious to what had been planned and implemented for their own future. The belief system that would facilitate a deliberate, Communist takeover of the U.S. was fostered within our political, economic, and educational systems, our religious institutions, and by the controlled mainstream media, including television, radio, motion pictures, and all print media.

Such operations require enormous sums of money to facilitate the secret progression from one stage to the next, and in that regard, the Rockefellers were a bottomless pit. The many institutions who received funding from the various Rockefeller foundations became beholden to their cause. American think tanks, colleges, universities, and research foundations were created by the Rockefellers as a means of conducting secret studies in genetics, eugenics, and social engineering.

The many misdirections already discussed within this exposé are but a few examples of how political coups are crafted, though it bears repeating that these methods are always intended to reinforce 'belief systems'. Unfortunately, far too many are lured into the traps that create the necessary illusions to bring the plans of others to fruition.

Those involved in creating wars plan and carry out assassinations, though they operate under the cloak of secrecy by paying others to do their dirty work. When they have an idea, a plan, or some other intention they decide to manifest, they allow others to participate with the understanding that if they get caught, then they are on their own. This policy is the foundation of our current financial and economic reality. Make no mistake about that.

Interconnected by a baker's dozen of (13) Illuminati families, the unspoken bond these people have pertains to the maintenance of their millennial, but private bloodlines. (Thank God for that!) But, as the consciousness of the masses increases, so does the understanding of what they do — and how they do it. These families prefer to maintain their secret bloodlines through intermarriage and incest, or in rare cases, infusing the genes of outsiders into the stream, in order to take over previously unchartered geographical territories.

Being related to a Rockefeller does not make Obama an American
Michael C. Rockefeller's staged disappearance provided the cover story for an even-greater opportunity. All the signposts are there, including the discovery, in 1952, that scientists could remove the nucleus of a frog cell and replace it with the nucleus of an embryonic frog cell. Result — a full-grown tadpole. What if the Rockefellers, through their financially-backed research foundations, could take the seed of one belonging to their own bloodline and infuse it into an egg, along with the DNA of a well-known historical figure? Not just anyone, you see, but someone with royal blood — someone who was loved by the people of her time, powerful, irresistible, mystical, and respected throughout history. Now, who might fit that description?

On the basis of appearance, it would be a person of color, not necessarily black, but a (genetically) non-white individual. One characteristic this person might transmute through DNA infusion would be a particular feature indigenous to only a few races, for example, purple lips — those from Southeast Asia — and Egypt. Judging from the Illuminists' preoccupation with things Egyptian, such as the pyramids of Egypt (the backside of a dollar bill), Isis (the goddess of fertility and mother of Horus), and Horus , (the protector of the monarchy, the "all-seeing eye" of the New Age, or New World Order), the DNA would have come from an ancient Egyptian pharaoh (also symbolized at Montaulk, Long Island, NY, the location on MK-Ultra mind-control/time-travel experiments).

In 1926, archeologists discovered an octagonally-shaped sarcophagus which contained a skeleton. The skeleton's head was removed (why?) and went missing during WWII. The sarcophagus was revisited in the early 1990's, and DNA research, conducted in 1990, by Austrian anthropologist Fabian Kanz, suggested that the skeleton belonged to Arsinoe, Cleopatra's younger sister. Cleopatra was the former Egyptian queen who followed Ptolemy, the general that Alexander the Great appointed pharaoh.

Nelson Rockefeller’s brother, David has been obsessed with ancient Egypt, having financed many expeditions to the pyramids and even underwritten the research of Egyptologist Dr. Charles Breasted.

It is quite possible that DNA studies were previously made of the skull, and that the same determination was made, in secret, that it was the skull of Arsinoe. DNA testing leads nowhere without comparative samples, so how was Arsinoe identified? Logically, she would have been compared to Cleopatra. That could only mean that the Rockefellers had discovered Cleopatra’s tomb.

On April 20th, 2009, National Geographic.com reported that an alabaster carving of Cleopatra's head was found near the site of the Taposiris temple complex in ancient Abusir, Egypt. Was this story just more of the same misdirection? There is a remarkable similarity between The Egyptian Book of the Dead and the Satanic rituals so many authors attribute to the Rockefellers.

As history is rewritten — and certainly this genealogically-based forensic research is contributing to that — it is very likely that Cleopatra's tomb had been previously discovered. Her DNA would have not only been compared to that of Arsinoe, it would have been revived in experiments that produced similar results to that of the 1952 frog cloning. Why not? It has been the subject of books and movies for the past 191 years. And those that finance such archeological expeditions, such as the Rockefellers, would keep such information private anyway.

The recent furor over Barack Obama's (aka Barry Soetoro, et al) fascination with his likeness to Egyptian statues, drawings, and other icons, along with his Egyptian hosts' proclamations of his historical return, suggest that the above-referenced deductions are not so far-fetched after all. His Egyptian friends may know more than they are telling us (or him), and the Rockefellers are telling us nothing.

As in previous examples of dialectical reasoning, selling Obama as an African-American is a pretext for selling us his ethnic makeup, one that would endear the support of black Americans. Then, any attack on Obama or his policies (designed by the Rockefellers) could be construed as racism, a favorite method of Illuminists used to divide (and conquer) the people. Like Michael C. Rockefeller, Obama would be expendable, evidenced throughout history by the Rockefellers' love for nothing but money and power. The argument between an Hawaiian and Kenyan birth is just misdirection, the recurring theme in the characterizations of the Dunham/Obama/Soetoro-clan hoax.

The real father, Michael C. Rockefeller, was ‘disappeared’ in order to prevent any possible DNA testing (as were all the other participants), and so, the path to the Truth has been almost completely obscured. We still have the possibility of conducting DNA tests, say, with David Rockefeller and Barack Obama providing samples, though we would have better luck getting a genuine Certificate of Live Birth.

The family that could afford to provide $1billion in campaign funding is the Rockefeller family. Having grown tired of rebuilding their empire every 4-8 years on the backs of politicians, they decided that one of their ‘own' would occupy the throne that would symbolically represent ancient Egypt. Egypt is the land they historically despised for its greatness, but the land of mystical, occult antiquities whose history and wealth they coveted for 150 years. The proof is evidenced in the symbolism on the paper money they create out of thin air.

Conclusion
Since Barack Obama, Jr. (aka Lolo Soetoro, et al) was not born to a father from Kenya, he cannot be an African-American.

And since his mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, was not born in America and has been identified here as a Russian spy, she cannot be an "American born in Kansas." She was only a surrogate and an agent for the Rockefellers.

Her alleged parents, Stanley Armour Dunham and Madelyn Lee (Payne) Dunham, who borrowed their surname from a ship's captain and their genealogy from historical accounts of real, heroic Americans, were not Americans at all. It matters not from whence they came — only that they were not Americans and were not born in the United States. Like their alleged daughter, they were agents for an international spy ring, financed by the Rockefellers on behalf of the governments of the former U.S.S.R., Nazi Germany, and others who were willing participants in the future revival of Communism.

Hawaiian banks have also played a major role in this tale, which is why the Hawaiian government has been so complicit in hiding the truth about Obama's non-citizenship. The old-money, Big-Five banking, pharmaceutical, and media families in Hawaii are the Bishops, the Lufkins, the Thurstons (intermarried with the Goodalls), the Kaisers, and the Morgans. Is it any surprise that the Morgan and Stanley families have intermarried and now call their banking family “Morgan Stanley Chase?” The Rockefeller connection is there, too. These are the only true connections Barack Obama has ever had to Hawaii.

The Kenyan ruse, which has been previously debunked throughout this serial article, has evaporated into obscurity. Again, DNA testing will prove conclusively that this research is accurate, and that the tale of Barack Obama, Sr. (aka Barry Soetoro, et al) is but a trivial segment of the entire hoax.

Any claim that Michael C. Rockefeller (or any other Rockefeller) might have made to substantiate his son's American citizenship has been forfeited by default. Making such a claim would be an outright admission of the hoax of Michael C. Rockefeller's disappearance, a risk that even the evil Rockefellers would not take after nearly 48 years.

In the absence of birth records or any other legitimate documentation, we could rightfully conclude that Barack Obama (aka Barry Soetoro, et al) is a man without a country. A likely creation of perverted medical science, experimentation, and pure fiction, he could just as easily been created in some dark laboratory, which would certainly explain his inability to speak in public without the aid of a TelePrompTer.

Revisiting Marxist dialectical materialism (otherwise known as 'hiding in plain sight') one final time:
Stage 1: Barack Obama — Stage 2: Barry Soetoro — Stage 3: Barry Rockefeller. Which name fits the mold? If in doubt, extract the first syllable of Barry, "Bar," and the first syllable of Rockefeller, "Rock." Add them together, and you get "Bar + Rock = BarRock" — or "Barack." You see, it was always right there before our very eyes. We just did not see it.

Now, Barry, or Barack, or whatever they call you, who's your daddy?

© 2009 Don Nicoloff, Direct Light Productions, The Idaho Observer

directlightproductions.com

[In order to minimize download time, this article has been divided into 2 parts: 7-A and 7-B]

To read Part 7-A, an in-depth analysis of who Barack Obama, Jr.‘s family is not and why Michael Rockefeller’s death was faked, click your computer’s mouse here.

BONUS Documentation

The Three Stooges go to Washington, Part 7-A

Sat, 18 Jul 2009 00:00:00 -0400

Barack Obama: Who’s your daddy?

By Don Nicoloff

July 18, 2009

The time has come when we shall lay to rest the question of Barack Hussein Obama’s (aka Barry Soetoro, et al) real father, the reason for so many name changes, and the revelation of hundreds, if not thousands of aliases tied to fraudulent real estate, insurance, and money-laundering transactions.

Let us be frank. Obama (aka Soetore, et al) was not born in Kenya. If he had been , he could prove it. He cannot. The fact that Obama (aka Soetoro, et al) has been able to find others willing to lie (or die) for him in that regard does not make it so. If he intended for us to believe that lie, he would have planted that seed in his autobiography, Dreams from My Father, the book that professional forensic analysts conclude was likely written by Weather Underground terrorist, William Ayers.

Obama (aka Soetoro, et al) was not born in Hawaii, either. If he had been, he could prove that. Presenting forged, fraudulent documentation and photos to the public via newspapers, magazines, TV show, political advertisements, and the Internet as substitutes for genuine documentation does not make it true, either. In fact, if we are to believe what his alleged African relatives swear they witnessed, Obama (aka Soetoro, et al) could not have been born in Hawaii, could he?

And what Truth could be so secret that the government of Hawaii must seal his Certificate of Live Birth? From what communicable disease are those official documents being protected? Swine flu? No, in this cast, the only possibility hinges on corruption—at the highest (or lowest) level.

So, where was Barack Obama (aka Barry Soetoro, et al) born and/or raised?

Papua, New Guinea. That’s right—Papua, New Guinea. All the signs are there. it is only a matter of connecting the dots and reading between the lines.

So, grab yourself a cup of coffee, tea, or your favorite non-alcoholic beverage, and prepare for a wild ride. Turn off the TV, the radio—even the music. Focus all of your attention on what you are about to read. We will begin to see more dots being connected, right before our very eyes, that we have in the past 100 years.

Imagine you are a parent and Obama (Soetoro, et al) has just proposed marriage to your daughter, and you could not give him your blessing, nor allow him to marry her until you learned the whole truth about him. Imagine that this would even be possible.

Imagine that you are the one to whom he has proposed. Would you not have a right to know such important details about his family, his race, his ethnicity, his nationality, his education, or his genes? Anything real, for that matter? Of course you would. Imagine that knowing the truth about those things could also be possible.

So why should it be any different for a whole nation or the people of the world to know the same things about its usurpation? After all, is is a critical requirement of the U.S. Constitution. There is no doubt about that. But there still remain a few questions about who is pulling the strings of a puppet Congress, Senate, Federal Elections Commission, and U.S. Justice Department. imagine that knowing that, too, is even possible.

Forget about ‘elections’. Those are staged. Bush 43’s election was a perfect example of that. So was Bill Clinton’s—all smoke and mirrors. We could probably arrive at the same conclusions by investigating all the presidential elections over the past 100 years, that is, if we could find any legitimate, untainted election records.

In order to get a handle on who is behind this most recent fraud perpetrated upon the American public—and the world—let us review the morsels of history that have been debunked within Parts 3-6 of this serial article. Americans have short memories, and so do historians. Forgive any repetition here. There are simply too many facts that might be overlooked by those with short memories, and there are too many statements of fact that have been (and will continue to be) debunked.

This seventh article will review all of the facts discovered in this proverbial needle-in-the-haystack exposé, before moving into new territory. Intuition will play a major role where records are, and have been, virtually non-existent.

The Dunham family: A web of misdirected tales
Barack Obama’s (aka Soetoro, et al) family “from Kansas” is a scripted fairy tale. Hoax might be the more appropriate description. The characters: Stanley Armour Dunham, Madelyn Lee (Payne) Dunham, and Stanley Ann Dunham were agents working for John D. Rockefeller’s Standard Oil Company and later, his Rockefeller Foundation. Rolla Charles Payne. Madelyn’s alleged father and Obama’s alleged maternal great-grandfather, worked as an agent for Standard Oil and was issued his Social Security number in Oklahoma, not as a farmer in Kansas. Misdirection is a common ploy of the international intelligence community, relying on the premise that those being misdirected lack the intelligence to tell the difference between a lie and the truth. The Dunham family’s story begins with misdirection.

Despite claims that the Dunhams met as childhood sweethearts, there is not one shred of evidence that either Stanley Armour or Madelyn lived in or attended school anywhere in the State of Kansas, let alone in Wichita. neither is there a shred of evidence that the Dunhams were ever married—only the scripted story. In an effort to add credibility to the story, those that spun the original yarn created a collage of photos representing various stages in the fiction lives of three foreign intelligence agents, commonly known as spies.

Stanley Armour Dunham: aka “Mr. Al from Chicago and Lebanon”
What we do know is that Stanley Armour (aka “Mr. Al from Chicago and Lebanon”) did not join the U.S. Army on December 8, 1941. he worked as a Communist spy, and the CIA still has a dossier describing both his sabotaging of a B-29 plane at the Boeing Aircraft factory in Wichita, KS and his theft of B-17 blueprints, subsequently sold to Nazi Germany during WWII, from the the same facility.

The Obama post-election damage-control/disinformation team, in anticipation of this research, attempted to substantiate Dunham’s military career in the U.S. Army by publishing a rather sloppy rendition of Kansas State World War II military veterans on the Kansas Historical Society (KHS) web site. A line-item printout of all Kansas military enlistments after December 7, 1941 was a feeble attempt to reinforce Obama’s “Dreams from My Father” tale that his grandfather “enlisted into the army the day after Pearl Harbor was attacked—on December 8, 1941.”

The KHS list, a disheveled representation of compile serial numbers, names, and numerical codes, attempt to legitimize the claim, but inadvertently reveals a minor detail that was not only unlikely, but impossible. The page appear to have been produced as a word-processing document and is not generated from database field, which would indicate that it produced in a hurried manner. The enlistment codes within the document include the recruiting stations of each of the enlisted personnel. Enlistment offices are designate by four digits, the first tow representing the location and second two representing the county location.

Stanley’s enlistment location, “7325,” is Ft. Leavenworth, KS. So, we are expected to believe that Stanley A. Dunham walked up to Ft. Leavenworth Army base (a military-intelligence base and military prison) and said something to the effect, “Hey, guys... I’m pretty upset about what the Japanese did to us at Pearl Harbor yesterday! Where do I sign up?

People do not enlist at military bases, yet that is exactly what Stanley Dunham’s enlistment record implies.

Attempts to extract the record directly from the National Archives (NARA) web site were made, and irregularities were immediately apparent, such as the now-familiar “no-such-record-found” result. Entering Dunham’s appropriate vital statistics was fruitless. On the basis of biographical accounts, Dunham would have enlisted in Sedgwick County, KS. The search failed, but another clue led to additional information.

Returning to the KHS document, Dunham’s serial number, 17056069, was noted and entered into a Google search engine, a voilà. The search returned to the KHS site, only this time, a single-entry record for “Dunham, Stanley A.” appeared. Though the NARA we site specifically stated that Dunham’s record did not exist, the KHS web site had a detailed listing of Dunham’s army enlistment records—a long-form version and two distinctly different line item entries which employed the exact serial number. What these records reveal is that Stanley A. Dunham allegedly enlisted in the U.S. Army, no once, not twice, but three times within a 6-month period, and each time in a different county location!

There are at least a dozen or more additional anomalies in the military record of Stanley A. Dunham, so let us look at those which are the most glaring, keeping in mind that the entire recored is fraudulent.

The National Archives record disputes Obama’s claims, including the date of enlistment:

Field Title                                                        TITLE VALUE                                   Meaning

ARMY SERIAL NUMBER                17056069                                          17056069
NAME                                               DUNHAM#STANLEY#A########   DUNHAM#STANLEY#A########
RESIDENCE: STATE                       73                                                     KANSAS
RESIDENCE: COUNTY                   173                                                    SEDGWICK
PLACE OF ENLISTMENT                7325                                                  FT. LEAVENWORTH KANSAS
DATE OF ENLISTMENT DAY          18                                                     18
DATE OF ENLISTMENT MONTH     01                                                     01
DATE OF ENLISTMENT YEAR        42                                                     42
GRADE: ALPHA DESIGNATION      PVT#                                                     Private
GRADE: CODE                                 00                                                      Private
BRANCH: ALPHA DESIGNATION   BI#                                           Branch Immaterial - Warrant Officers, USA
BRANCH: CODE                               00                                            Branch Immaterial - Warrant Officers, USA
FIELD USE AS DESIRED                  #                                                       #
TERM OF ENLISTMENT                   5                                                      Enlistment for the duration of the War
LONGEVITY                                      ###                                                   ###
SOURCE OF ARMY PERSONNEL   0                                                      Civil Life
NATIVITY                                          73                                                     KANSAS
YEAR OF BIRTH                              18                                                      18
RACE AND CITIZENSHIP                 1                                                       White, citizen
EDUCATION                                      4                                                       4 years of high school
CIVILIAN OCCUPATION                   175                                                   Salespersons
MARITAL STATUS                             2                                                      Married
COMPONENT OF THE ARMY           6                                                   Army of the United States - includes the following: Voluntary enlistments effective December 8, 1941 and thereafter; One year enlistments of National Guardsman whose State enlistment expires while in the Federal Service; Officers appointed in the Army of the United States under Army Regulations 605-10
CARD NUMBER                                  #                                                      #
BOX NUMBER                                   0245                                                  0245
FILM REEL NUMBER                        2.102                                                 2.102

Kansas Historical Society Records (2) reveal two more enlistments, both Unregistered (fraudulent):

Name                                Service        Number      Registration Place                  Comments
Dunham, Stanley A.   Enlisted, Army   17056069        Unregistered            Wichita Sedgwick Co. (Board #3)
Dunham, Stanley A.   Enlisted, Army   17056069        Unregistered             Augusta Butler Co. (Board #2)

Source: Adjutant General Armed Forces Personnel Who Served between September 16, 1940, and June 30, 1946.

Location: 31-04-08-02 to 31-04-08-05

Dunham’s three enlistment date span a 6-month, 10-day period, December 8, 1941 to June 18, 1942. The first day was proffered by Dreams from My Father author Barack Obama, Jr. (aka Soetoro, et al). The second date, january 18, 1942 represents Ft. Leavenworth, KS. The third date, June 18, 1942, represents a third enlistment in Augusta, KS. In each case, Dunham was unregistered, so he did not serve in the U.S. Army.

Note the anachronistic reference to Dunham being ‘white’. The term used in 1942 would have been “Caucasian.” On the basis of the author’s prior research, “Arabic” would have been the most appropriate answer.

[Note: A record search of the “Location” field (above) returns to the Kansas State Historical Society web site, revealing that the field’s reference numbers actually refer to U.S. Navy enlistees and inductees from Greeley County, KS (Board #1) during WWII. Dunham’s name, as should be expected, is not included in the list, despite the ‘source’ being referenced by an ‘official’ catalogue number. Again, the above ‘military record’ attempts to legitimize Stanley A. Dunham’s U.S. Army enlistment, though four separate record searches (by the author) produced nothing more than false, misleading, and fraudulent ‘documentation’ proving, once more, that the Dunham’s were foreign spies and infiltrators. The following link supports this conclusion: Click here to see for yourself.]

Photos fail to support claims of U.S. Army enlistment
A previously published photo depicting Stanley’s U.S. Army uniform was a Photoshop creation. The fraudulent photo was used to brainwash an unsuspecting public into believing the Dunhams were a family of three. Since the photo has been determined to be a ridiculous compilation—and a rather poor one, considering the capabilities of Photoshop as a professional software-based editing program—the Dunham story has no merit whatsoever. [See Part 6.]

Stanley, the lifelong furniture salesman, posed for another photo with OSS/CIA/MI6 assets Dr. Charles Raschke, Grace Raschke, Madelyn Dunham, Dr. George King, and an unidentified woman who appeared to be equally enamored with Stanley’s charms, snuggling closer for a candid photographic shot in an Oklahoma City restaurant. The dinner table was obviously overflowing with shots of a different sort.

King went on to California to found the Aetherius Society, a religious cult whose followers were hoodwinked into believing he was Earth’s self-appointed spokesperson, as he transmitted and received “messages from the Cosmos.” King, according to legend, developed his uncanny abilities by “doing Hatha and Raja yoga no less than 12 hours per day.” [See Part 4.]

A more recent Internet photo appeared in a November 4, 2009 tribute to Barack Obama, Jr.’s (aka Barry Soetoro, et al) grandmother who was claimed to have passed on, due to her long battle with cancer. The article, published by “HonoluluAdvertiser.com,” included a new photo of Madelyn and Stanley Armour Dunham. A youthful Madelyn is hugged by Stanley in front of what appears to be a typical Midwestern house. The house and the subjects are obviously suffering from abnormal physical manifestations which defy 3rd-dimensional physics—and logic.

Photo 1-A, The “Exacto-knife Shot”

Pictured (R) are Madelyn and “Sgt.” Stanley Armour Dunham in front of a Midwestern-style house implied to be near Ft. Leavenworth, KS. Notice the unusual angle of the house, tilting downward at 22.5 degrees. Both subjects are also leaning to the right, though not at the same angle as the house, so we can conclude they have been ‘compiled’ into the photo of the house. Madelyn’s polka-dotted dress seems normal, though there is an anomaly that appears upon closer inspection.

Stanley’s U.S. Army uniform: hat, belt, pants, and shirt are replete with anomalies. His hat is a U.S. Marines hat, chin strap resting neatly above the visor. The back of the hat (because it has been cropped from another photo) and his hair appear to have been sliced with an Exacto knife. The gratuitous white-walls cut around the ears do not appear in other photos, nor do the innumerable facial blemishes, which resemble leprosy upon enlargement. Stanley’s shirt pocket appears to travel to his armpit, and contains a very large object the size of a book. The belt, due to the buckle’s small size, belongs on a Marine uniform. Though his trousers appear to be excessively creased in the front, the rear pocket carries an object the size of a canteen while the material itself is bunched like a plastic bag.

At the bottom of the belt (where it meets the pants(, there is a noticeable gap that appears upon magnification. The gap reveals the color of Madelyn’s dress and more polka dots. [See Photo 1-C below.] Other physical abnormalities include: the tip of Stanley’s right hand middle finger, which is darker in shade that the rest of that hand. His left hand, also a different shade, is 50% larger than the right hand, and his left arm is 25% longer than would be natural. Stanley’s entire head is also Photoshopped onto someone else’s body, and his face is darker than the rest of his skin, with the exception of the aforementioned finger. The upper torso of the Frankenstein is far too short for the rest of the body’s proportions.

Again, we have the now-familiar look-the-other-way photo session, though this one is a classic.

Photo 1-B, The “Exacto-knife Shot” (Upright)

Photo 1-B is the result of adjusting the tilt effect found in photo 1-A. The author superimposed a grid over the original photo in order to straighten the house as it should appear in real life. Aligning the left wall of the house to cause it to become upright, or perpendicular to the ground, the porch rises unnaturally (upwards to the the right0. This adjustment forces all of the skewed elements (outside of the grid’s boundaries) from the photo, so it is now smaller in size. Now Stanley appears to be leaning slightly forward, Madelyn is leaning to her right, and we can see that the porch railing has been compiled into the photo. Straightening the photo causes at least 3 feet of the photo’s content to be rotated outside the grid, though doing so reveals the fraudulent nature of the setting, house, shrubs, and subjects. Obama’s (aka Soetoro, et al) minions can do a better job than that—or can they?

Photo 1-C, Close-up of Stanley’s Belt

The photo at left shows the unusual belt anomaly in close-up detail. At the point where the belt should cover Stanley’s trousers, there is actually a gap that reveals numerous polka dots found in the material of Madelyn’s dress. The photo has been ‘inverted’, so the dress is ‘white with black polka dots’. Though some of the dots are blurred, there are at least a dozen seen where Stanley’s belt and trousers should be but are not because of an abnormal gap. The black, vertical object is actually the belt loop of the trousers. Notice that there is no belt where there should be one. In short, this magnified section of the above photograph shows that it is has been constructed of multiple images and is fraudulent. Of course, you can zoom in on the original photos above to see the white polka dots which appear between Stanley’s trousers and belt.

Photo 1-D, The aftermath of 100 bee stings

The close-up head crop of Stanley and Madelyn Dunham (at left) reveals several anomalies which are not attributable to pixel distortion. Without this extreme magnification, it was already apparent that the head had been compiled into the photo and does not belong to the body below it.

This magnification reveals many facial ‘lumps’ which resemble bee stings. The lumps appear on Stanley’s face, ears, and neck and seem to be manifesting on his hair and hat.

No other part of the photo exhibits this phenomenon, except for the line which traverses Madelyn’s forehead.

Again, these abnormalities are not found when magnifying the average family photo.

Madelyn Dunham laundered more that the family wash
The portrait of Madelyn Dunham is equally blurred by misstatements of fact regarding her family, birthplace, schooling, marriage, vocation, and promotion the vice-presidency of two banks; the first in Seattle, WA and the second in Honolulu, HI. Biographies dispute the year of Madelyn’s high school graduation, differing by as much as three years. Her pregnancy and subsequent delivery of Stanley Ann could not have occurred on November 29, 1942, if she had secretly married Stanley, since he claimed to have been serving in the U.S. Army in Europe immediately after basic training. No woman in history has safely carried a baby she conceived while being separated from her mate, by a distance of some 5,000 miles or more, for more that 11 months. Sorry, it is just not possible, and even the messiah’s grandmother could not accomplish the feat. Stanley’s U.S. Army uniform underscores the absurdity of the story, having been constructed from multiple images. Result: Madelyn and Stanley Armour Dunham were impostors created to establish a foundation for the subsequent citizenship issue that had arisen during the 2008 presidential campaign.

One can only conclude, due to the family’s composite photos, that the family spent little or no time together, evidenced by the implausibility of the entire story and the lack of even one genuine family photograph. The Dunhams were surrogates for Stanley Ann and had no familial affection for her whatsoever. She was nothing but a spy-in-training, likely born, raised and groomed in East Germany, Lebanon, Syria, or elsewhere in the Middle East. [Recall the “Mr. Al from Chicago and Lebanon” reference in Part 3.]

Madelyn Lee Payne, according to legend, worked as a waitress before landing a riveter’s job at Boeing in Wichita, Kansas. If she did work there, she worked as an agent who facilitated Stanley Armour’s sabotage/espionage activities. A later account of her job description claims she was an aircraft inspector. [Waitresses, especially when leaving their restaurant jobs during time of war, are naturally suited for aircraft inspections.]

The Dunham’s presence in Oklahoma city was related to Tinker Field (later, Tinker AFB), the strategic location from which the U.S. ran their operations in World War II. Sixty-two years later, Tinker AFB is still the largest employer in the area. When the Raschke clan move to Texas, the Dunhams followed. King’s move to California coincided with Raschke’s transfer to Safeway Foods and Madelyn’s semi-secret education at the University of California at Berkeley. The Dunham’s move to Seattle and Mercer Island followed. The missing time in the Dunham chronology is evidenced by the clandestine associations of this previously-unknown spy ring. The Dunhams were likely serving their Russian masters in New York and in occupied East Germany and Moscow.

Madelyn Lee Payne’s “strict-Methodist upbringing” precede her metamorphosis into atheistic Communism during the Dunham’s stint at the Little Red Chapel in Bellevue, Washington. Again, actions speak louder than words, and what has been researched and written by the mainstream and the alternative media reveals that Obama’s autobiography is nothing but a pack of lies and propaganda intended to evoke sympathy. The Dunhams routinely met with local officials of the Communist Party based at the church. After all, who did those atheists worship if they did not worship God?

And Madelyn Dunham’s role at the Bank of Hawaii qualified her to participate in massive money-laundering schemes, fronting for her international task masters, not just for those across the U.S. As the bank’s vice-president, escrow manager, and mortgage broker, she was able to launder money through bogus real estate schemes that still employ aliases, bogus court records, and stolen identities. Upon her retirement from the Bank of Hawaii, she volunteered her time to the local probate court, which afforded her the opportunity to track real estate transactions for banks in Hawaii and other parts of the U.S.

Her daughter, her grandson, and thousands of others are brazenly listed within Internet and secure databases throughout the U.S. Those databases do exist, portions having been previously exposed in this research. if you want to understand the bailout, stock-market Ponzi schemes, international money laundering, and identity theft, study Madelyn Dunham. [See Parts 3-6]

Charles Reed Bishop, founder of the Bank of Hawaii
The biographical accounts of Charles Reed Bishop are uncharacteristically detailed when compared to those of his contemporaries, yet extensive genealogical research produces no valid evidence that corroborates those claims, whatsoever. Buried within a maze of misdirection and innuendo, none of the characters who allegedly participated in his upbringing can be proven to have even existed, including his father, mother, aunts, uncles, and other ‘mentors’ or ‘business’ associates.

The improbability of Bishop, allegedly from Glen Falls, New York, taking an 8-month voyage from Massachusetts to Oregon, around the tip of South America, is equally absurd, for he could have walked there in half the time. What would a student proclaimed to have attended school only in the “7th and 8th grades” have had in common with Harvard Law School graduate, Wiliam Little Lee, his traveling partner? Even Lee’s genealogy cannot be determined and only further obfuscates the tale.

Disregarding Bishop’s Kamchamcha Schools biography, he married Bernice Pauahi, an Hawaiian royal princess. Little else is known until he founded Bishop & C., in 1858m with partner William A. Aldrich. After a series of bank acquisitions, the Bishop Trust created what was to become the First Hawaiian Bank, the predecessor of the Bank of Hawaii. Charles Dexter Lufkin, of pharmaceutical fame, took over control of the bank in 1901 and established the first branch of the Bank of Hawaii in 1903.

Federal Reserve Act author, Paul Warburg (a Rothschild banking agent) had first illegally entered the U.S. in 1903, at Ellis Island, ten years prior to the creation of the Federal Reserve. Aided by then-Senator Nelson Aldrich, U.S. financial elites secretly met at Jeckyll Island, S. Carolina to pen the Act, which remained secret until its discovery in 1816. notice that an ‘Aldrich’, again, played a role in the establishment of the banks in Hawaii, and subsequently became the middle name of future N.Y. Governor/U.S. V.P. Nelson Aldrich Rockefeller. [See “Deathbed confessions, photos support claims that George H. Scherf(f), Jr. was the 41st U.S. President,” Don Nicoloff / The Idaho Observer, April, 2007]

After Princess Bernice Pauahi Bishop’s passing in 1884, Charles Bishop moved to San Francisco, California, residing in the Occidental Hotel. the fire of 1906 destroyed many of Bishop’s cherished keepsakes, including the hotel, though he was able to regroup and continue buying properties in that city, Oakland Berkeley, and other communities throughout the state. As his real estate acquisitions increased, so did his banking acquisitions throughout the southwestern U.S.

Was it a coincidence that two triangular-shaped hotels in Seattle, Washington, the Occidental Hotels, were destroyed by fire, the first in 1881, and the second in 1889? Was it another coincidence that the Dunhams also temporarily settled in Seattle some years later?

The origin of the “Dunhams” (BHO’s alleged “Kansas-born” grandparents)
The will of Princess Bernice P. Bishop disclosed a crucial puzzle piece which is beyond coincidental. Her husband’s niece, of Stockton CA (Bernice’s “namesake”) was granted $200, which in 1884, was a considerable sum of money. the niece’s name? Emma Bernice Bishop Dunham. Emma was the alleged daughter of Charles’ brother, Henry Bostwick Bishop. henry’s genealogy was equally nebulous, though Emma’s was traceable to a James S. Dunham, a ship captain who sailed cargo ships on the Great Lakes and was instrumental in spearheading the deepening of a harbor—in Chicago. Bernice married James in 1881.

It is highly probable that the Dunham name was borrowed from the Bishop clan, as a means of hiding the original identity of the bank’s future “first female vice-president.” Madelyn Dunham, as previously mentioned, allegedly attended the University of California, Berkeley, which was beyond coincidental, considering Charles Bishop’s real estate acquisition in that city. The connection to the Bishops of California and the ship capain in Chicago no revealed why the Dunhams were in Cicago—as agents for Charles Reed Bisho’s Chicago banking/real estate interests and his silent partner, John D. Rockefeller.

Stanley Ann Dunham secretly schooled in Oklahoma City, not in Kansas
We learned [in Part 4] that a former schoolmate of Stanley Ann Dunham asserts that he not only attended kindergarten with Stanley Ann at the Estes School in Warr Acres, Oklahoma, but that he was also “in love” with her. After confessing his affections for her to his parents, he was told that thry were “close friends” with the Dunhams. The informant added, “She was 18 months older than me. i was five years old, and she was six an one-half.”

[Warr Acres, a suburb of Oklahoma City, was founded by C.B. Warr after WWII, in 1948. Actually, Warr had petitioned to have Warr Acres, Ferguson, and Putnam city incorporated into a separate city. In 1929, Warr ran a company called Warr Industries. The author speculates, based upon a preponderance of historical evidence, that Warr Industries was likely financed by someone other that C.B. Warr. Who might that have been?

Financier Bernard Baruch, former head of the War Industries Board, presidential advisor to Woodrow Wilson (during WWI) and Franklin D. Roosevelt (during WWII). Though Baruch’s wikipedia.org biography wastes no time in pointing out his ancestors were of Sephardic Jewish extraction, his family was in the shipping business.

Baruch attended the City College of New York, bought a seat on the NY Stock Exchange and helped finance the political campaigns of many Democratic politicians. His affiliations with the United Nations Atomic Energy Commission and the synthetic rubber industry hinted of a likely association with the Rockefellers, though that relationship, like so many others, would have been kept under wraps. Baruch, according to a diary entry of James Forrestal, former Secretary of Defense (suicided at Bethesda Naval Hospital), had advised Forrestal that “if the British were to arm the Arabs, it would be inequitable for us not to furnish similar equipment to the Jews.”

After WWII, C.B. Warr began turning his attention to real estate development, and it is no accident that madelyn Dunham followed suit, later becoming an escrow manager/mortgage broker as a vice-president of the Bank of Hawaii. James S. Dunham was the likely ship captain responsible for coordinating the arms shipped from Oklahoma City to Chicago, then across the Great Lakes and to points beyond.]

In 1949, the two attended the first grade at Putnam City Elementary School. My informant also described his school experience as “mind control for kids.” Reading about Stanley Ann Dunham (in Part 3) jogged his memory. he finally realized that the mainstream media had dropped the “Stanley” from all references, referring to her as simply “Ann,” and he knew that this athor had discovered something he was in a unique position to confirm. Two photos he provided were proof of his own experience—proof that conclusively debunked the original remise of Obama’s autobiography as well. In other words, the Dunhams were not from Kansas, as we had been told.

The Stanley Ann depicted in the school photograph looked remarkably different from those later published by the Obama political machine. It is plausible that switch was made, once it was discovered that even as a 7-year-old, the original Stanley Ann was a bit too much to handle. With a few years, Stanley Ann’s blonde hair, unlike her mother’s, turned coal-black. her once-wavy hair had suddenly become very kinky. [See Part 6]

This same informant intimated that his own family originally hailed from New York, but spent considerable time in Chicago before moving to Oklahoma City. His father’s job with Naval Intelligence at Tinker Field (now Tinker AFB) demanded the move to Oklahoma, and he stressed that “Mr. Al” frequently visited them there as well.”

After several years in Oklahoma City, the informant’s father was reassigned a position with the Office of Naval Intelligence in Denison, Texas, and the Dunham clan were seen there, too.

Stanley Ann’s Mercer Island High School Education, the cover story for the Dunhams’ move to Seattle, prepared her for the Marxist ideals she would later fulfill as a “micro-financier (loan officer) of indigent women in Southeast Asia.” Four Marxist faculty members at MIHS well knew the role Stanley Ann was to play, and their glowing reports of her academic prowess, her confrontations with authority figures, and her independent thinking mirrored their Communist-influenced ideals.

After Stanley Ann’s graduation from MIHS, the family packed their suitcases and headed for greener pastures in Hawaii. Stanley forbade his daughter from accepting “a scholarship to the University of Chicago” because “Chicago was a dangerous place” for such a young girl. there was no mention, however, of the four houses—all in Madelyn’s name—in Chicago, discovered by this author (and independent investigators+ while researching Madelyn’s Communist ties. [the reader should also bear in mind that the State of Illinois was probably not yet equipped to issue bogus Certificates of Live Birth for undocumented aliens in 1960-61, at least not officially.]

Stanley Ann’s phantom trip to Hawaii
The next chapter of the saga had Stanley Ann accompanying her parents to Honolulu, where Stanley found a “better job in another furniture store.” Madelyn became one of two female vice0presidents at the Bank of Hawaii, and her daughter “enrolled in the University of Hawaii, Manoa” Transcripts prove she attended school in Washington, so she did not make trip to Honolulu as advertised. The Zionist-controlled media has continued to play a conspiratorial role in this dimension of the coverup as well.

Since she did not attend the University of Hawaii, she did not meet, fall in love with, or marry Barack Obama, Sr. there. obama did not atten the school, either. His non-presence there is evidenced by one single photograph into which his (or someone else’s image was compiled. the story, by this time has reached the pinnacle of corruption and deceit. [See Part 6]

Stanley Ann did not meet Barack, St. in a Russian-language class. A graduate student and a freshman enrolled in the same class? Highly unlikely. And how would a Kenyan goatherd’s son benefit by speaking russian upon his return to Kenya? Nyet!—or better, still—na-aaaaaaa!!! This was just another preposterous yarn intended to misdirect the sheeple.

By her own admission (to a former classmate at MIHS) Stanley Ann bragged (while still in Seattle) that she “could have a baby without getting married and without having sex.” The psychological pressure she bore must have been staggering as she contemplated her future role as the surrogate mother of someone else’s child. when she later aded this fried to change young Barry’s (aka Barack) diaper after feeding, she revealed her subconscious disgust, early on, for the authoritarian role she had been forced to play.

Stanley Ann becomes a nude model
In the summer of 1961, Stanley Ann appeared in beach photos, wearing a bikini, which clearly revealed she was not pregnant during what should have been her third trimester. Subsequent nude photos, apparently taken by Frank Marshall Davis, appeared in porn magazines by Christmas, 1961. A teenaged Stanley Ann, sporting some cheap jewelry, knee-high stockings, hi-heels, and her birthday suit, posed in a Christmas-tree setting, kneeling, squatting, and lying on the floor of Davis’ hawaii apartment. Stanley Ann’s photos were published on the Internet and included a web site URL, “free-vintage-porn.com” and a reference number inscribed with a white grease pencil. The number, “YA-438” was a code for something, and the author deduced that it was not her initials. [See below.]

These nude photo sessions in no way buttress the argument that Stanley Ann attended the U. of Hawaii at Manoa. She was likely on a Christmas break from her schooling in Washington anc could have met Davis while vacationing in Hawaii or in Chicago. The relationship with Stanley Armour and Davis had already been established, and Davis was an admitted Communist. Who better to mentor the surrogate mother of a future Communist political figure? Consider that her name was not really Stanley Ann Dunham, which has been a recurring theme throughout this research.

Davis, author of “Sex Rebel,” was a frequent card-playing, dope-smoking, drinking buddy of both
Stanley Armour Dunham and Barry Soetoro (aka Barack Obama, Jr.). In his book Davis disclosed a ménage-à-trois with a Seattle couple named “Dot and Lloyd.”

Dot and Lloyd were actually Dorothy K. and Lloyd G. Yamamoto. Dorothy Yamamoto became the second (aforementioned) vice-president of the Bank of Hawaii. Lloyd was a chemist/virologist who worked for the CIA and is referenced in “Antiviral Research, originally from the University of Michigan and republished by Elsevier/North-Holland, 1989.

Lloyd Yamamoto, the son of a geneticist, was born in Michigan, but moved to Cleveland, Ohio at an early age, graduating from South High School in 1936. Cleveland was also the home of John D. Rockefeller. The connections to Dr. Charles Raschke (OSS/CIA asset originally from New York and a food chemist for Wilson & Company/Safeway Foods); Stanley Armour Dunham (KGV/OSS/CIA/Mossad asset); Madelyn Dunham (KGB/CIA/Mossad asset); and Dr. George King (MI6/CIA/Mossad asset) are now quite obvious.

Chicago osteopath Dr. Kaasem Khaleel asserts the the person in those nude photos (Stanley Ann Dunham) showed no signs of ever having been pregnant or having given birth. Coincidentally, those photos are the only one that appear to be genuine out of the entire Dunham/Obama/Soetoro family album, though they were found and published on the Internet after having been originally published in porn magazines. Why?

An earlier Internet search of the “YA-438” code led to numerous references to automobile tires, motorcycle parts, forestry-related biological/genetic research, computer programs, and even video games. Revisiting the code a second time not only revealed the aliases of the Dunham clan, but a passenger ship’s list, laden with a dossier of international Soviet spies. The code, YA-438, stood for “Yugoslavia-438.” The SS Oxfordshire’s passenger list officially represented alleged “refugees from the Bagnolii [sic’, Italy internment camp,” whose prisoners were were purported to have been freed in 1949—nearly four years after the end of WWII. Prisoners from Poland, Latvia, the Ukraine, Czechoslovakia, Germany, Austria, Hungary, and Yugoslavia were shuttled from Naples, italy on February 5, 1950 to Fremantle, Australia on March 6, 1950, in order to escape political persecution after the war. The sponsor, International Refugee Organization, under the auspices of ‘Group Resettlement to Australia’, organized the database as a representation of emigrés who were relocated from the Bagnoli [sic] Camp. The Immigrant Ships Transcribers Guild likely has no idea what the list actually represents—or do they?

Contemplate having been torn from your family, your friends, your roots, your home, and your country, before considering that your only available option was to seek asylum in Australia. The story is preposterous, yet that is exactly what we are told had occurred. No doubt, there were people transported to Australia, but they were not refugees from WWII, they were spies. Though list number each passenger and their roll number, many passenger numbers were followed by an asterisk (*), which meant (according to the list’s transcribers) that those persons did not board the ship. why were those passengers included on the passenger list if they were not onboard the ship?

The passenger list from the SS Oxfordshire included a title heading and five significant names which follow:

SS Oxfordshire
Naples, Italy to Fremantle, Australia
Departed - Naples, Italy 5 FEB 1950
Arrived - Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia 06 MAR 1950
International Refugee Organization
Group Resettlement to Australia
Ex Bagnoli Camp

435 0052   MADUNA     Ana               Austria
436 0049   MADUNA     Friderik         Yugoslavia
437 0050   MADUNA     Magdalena    Yugoslavia
438 0051   MADUNA     Sofija            Yugoslavia
439 0053   MADUNA     Viktoria         Austria

On the surface, the list seems genuine, but after associating it with the aforementioned pornographic photos of Stanley Ann Dunham, it is a clear indication and an enormous revelation—that Stanley Ann Dunham, at age 8, was traveling overseas with her intelligence-agent companions, Stanley Armour Dunham (aka “Mr. Al from Chicago and Lebanon”). (aka “Friderik Maduna” from Yugoslavia); and Madelyn Lee (Payne) Dunham (aka “Magdalena Maduna).

The dates of the ship’s passage, February 5—March 6, 1950 was highly improbable and likely did not even occur. The list served as a dossier of Communist counter-intelligence assets and their locations. There was no POW camp at “Bagnoli, Italy.” The town referenced is “Bagnola.”

There are 32 references to the Maduna name in the U.S. in one database, seven being in the State of California and one in Texas (Magdalena Maduna), and another database lists 18. Internet searches reveal that the Maduna name is found in Croatia, though it is much more commonly found in South Africa than in the U.S.

Cross-reference the name in the U.S. revealed, quite unexpectedly, a return to the Bishop family name, likely because of the association to real estate fraud previously mentioned in Parts 4-6 of this research. And that name, like the others, led to The Ryland Group, another real estate/construction firm.

Stanley Ann Dunham, the “anthropologist”
Upon her alleged return to Hawaii, after a 5 to 9-year stay in Indonesia (depending on which account you consider to be accurate). Stanley Ann Dunham-Obama-Soetoro allegedly pursued a Doctorate degree at the University of Hawaii. Since she had not attended the school in 1960-61, the claim is another hoax. She could not have even earned a Bachelor’s degree in Knitting at the University of Washington because she had not spent there in the first place.

Where did she earn the degree that would have qualified her to earn a Master’s degree? And where did she earn that Master’s degree? Simply, there was no Bachelor’s degree, no Master’s degree, nor any Doctorate. The claims of a thesis entitled, “Peasant Blacksmithing in Indonesia,” document that varies in length from “850-1427 pages,” again, depending on the account du jour, are preposterous. If she earned a degree anywhere, it would have been a BS degree from the School of Hard Knocks.

A recurring theme in the cover stories of at least three characters in the Dunham/Obama/Soetoro production is that they have become “anthropologists.” These characters, along with the ruse that they somehow are or were interested in humankind are absurd. There is one family that has been obsessed with the topic, and we will learn the identity of the others two anthropologists shortly.

The Lolo Soetoro myth
In order to further confound the truth behind the Obama myth, another fictional character, Lolo Soetoro, was created to provide an alibi for Stanley Ann Dunham’s overseas forays to Southeast Asia as an agent for the Ford Foundation (aka Rockefeller Foundation). No one of any particular significance had yet heard of a Barack Obama, Jr. (aka Barry Soetoro, et al), and the fable, including the so-called “Indonesian adoption papers,” was created in order to hide his real identity. Stanley Ann’s alleged marriage and subsequent divorce were just more of the now-familiar smoke and mirrors deigned to hide the truth. With a second surrogate father posing a potential risk, Lolo Soetoro had to be eliminated in order prevent future DNA testing, or he never really existed in the first place.

The Indonesian school registration documents contribute to the polarized arguments regarding Obama’s (aka Soetoro, et al) professed religion: Christianity. It is quite unusual—even dysfunctional—for an atheistic mother (born to Methodist/Baptist parents) and a Muslim step-father to send their son to a Catholic school, then to a Muslim school. Obama, if he even attended these schools, was trained in ideology, not religion. The ideology was akin to the role he currently plays and to his true bloodline. Those forgeries are available on the Internet and will not waste space here.

Proffered as proof that Barry Soetoro attended school in Indonesia, this predominantly illegible carbon-copy document was manufactured. The document’s identification (above the top line), though barely visible to the naked eye, is reversed, indicating that what appears on its face has been added and is not genuine. The bordered fields into which the data has been entered are not consistently aligned, their lines differing in width and skewed in relationship to the paper stock’s background. Enlargement reveals separated lines at the corners of the black, rectangular boxes, an abnormality that is not found in type-set documents created by professional printing companies.

Close inspection of the print (on the back side of this document) which is written on graph paper reveals the words, “ANGKA NILAI.” Translated into English from Indonesian, the back side of the paper (which is actually the front side) reads: “SCORE POINTS,” indicating that the paper stock is actually used TO TALLY TEST SCORES, NOT TO REGISTER STUDENTS. Birth data, parents’ names, etc. would not be documented on the backside of a sheet of graph paper used to score tests. This alleged school registration document is FRAUDULENT.

The Indonesian adoption papers revealed more of the already-familiar forged documents. Stanley Ann Dunham signer MIHS yearbook by employing the name, “Stanley”—not “Stanley Ann” and not “Anne.” She never called herself “Ann,” though the media still parrots the name in the futile attempt to feminize her persona. her cursive style was quite different from that represented in the adoption papers. She was meticulous, literally to a “T,” especially when comparing her yearbook signature to the forged document samples. The creators of those fraudulent, forged documents never anticipated the resourceful, investigative analysis that would be undertaken by Ron Polarik, Debbie Schlussel, and others.

[From the outset of his research, the author knew that the Obama myth was just that. He also knew that Obama’s real mother—not Stanley Ann Dunham—was anything but a white woman. To the contrary, it was the father who provided the white genes, the mother providing genes of a darker-skinned race, though not necessarily black. the debunking of the Dunham clan fable was the first step in disproving Obama’s claim that he is of African descent, though born in Hawaii. the Soetoro clan was just another ruse intended to further cloud the issue and provide an alibi for Stanley Ann and him having been in Southeast Asia. See below.]

The Hegelian dialectic in action
The elaborate story which promulgated the philosophical writings of Georg Wilhelm Hegel (1770-1831), from which Karl Marx developed his three-stage process of “dialectical materialism,” required a third element.

Stage 1: Create the myth that Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. was born of a Kenyan father and and American mother who met at a university neither attended. The place where this was to have occurred was Honolulu, HI, thus establishing a basis for claiming U.S. citizenship. No proof or legitimate documentation would be found, as officials could (and did) claim that “those records were sealed.” Claim that Obama, St. studied economics (part of the Dunham myth) and that Stanley Ann studied to become an anthropologist.

Stage 2: Create the myth that Obama, like his father, was born in Kenya, the event having been witnessed by an alleged grandmother in Kenya. Now there are dialectical anomalies, over which the entire world community—including genealogists, historians, authors, and researchers—still argue today.

On the basis of the fraudulent identities of all the characters in this charade, neither scenario is possible. Create a divorce, under the pretext of a continuing education at Harvard University, that likely did not occur.

Still, the media continues to beat the drum of the Hawaiian birth as the sole assertion of Obama’s U.S. citizenship. Further obfuscate the matter by claiming that Obama, St. was a poligamist, though a respected economist for the Kenyan government. Blame two automobile accidents on his drinking, even though an alcoholic who lost both legs in the first accident would not be driving in the second one a year later. Eliminate any risk of the truth becoming known by getting rid of the namesake and any consequential discovery though DNA testing. (How convenient!)

Stage 3: The real identity of Barack Obama, Jr.’s parents was to remain hidden behind a dark veil of deceit promoted in states one and two (above). Sequester the true parents of Barry Soetoro (aka Barack Hussein Obama, Jr., et al), and no one will ever discover whose agenda he is destined to fulfill. At least, that is how the ruse is constructed. Further obfuscate his genealogy by introducing yet another surrogate father, this time—Lolo Soetoro—and compound the scam by substituting him as the excuse for Obama, Jr.’s (aka Barry Soetoro, et al) having been in Indonesia (his actual birthplace), though he could have equally been groomed in Russia or East Germany—and probably was.

What was not anticipated is the recognition of a scheme based upon an Hegelian foundation of dialectical reasoning and that Marx developed a three-stage materialistic process, employed by the very organizations behind the creation of this political/genealogical myth. The cover story excluded any possibility of stage three even being considered as a possibility, due to the public’s preoccupation with the dialectical argument over which story, either stage one or stage two, was actually true. Simply, the facts behind stage three were also constructed to insure misdirection would induce more public debate over trivial issues, such as “Did Obama attend a Catholic or Muslim school?”; “Did Obama really live in Jakarta?”; and “Why doesn’t Obama produce legitimate documentation about any of these or other pertinent issues?”

The key to Marxist dialectical materialism’s efficacy is in ‘selling’ the stories—any or all of them. After all, the participants were followers of Marxism, were they not? And the true purpose behind any dialectical plot is to confound and confuse while creating one or more false realities which hide one’s true intent. In Obama’s case, the false realities center around two unanswered questions: “Where he was born—and to whom?” The facts do not add up as presented to the public. As proven (so far) in this research, Obama’s ‘cover story’ is a myth.

So, where would anyone begin to search for a possible father or mother of a mythical figure such as Barack Obama, Jr. (aka Barry Soetoro, et al)? In the singular place where the plot was conceived, developed and financed—Papua, New Guinea. And who would have been the most likely candidate on the paternal side of the family? We shall find out in due time.

Damage control: New research reveals the continuation of a massive, but incompetent coverup
While fact checking and comparing the original statements of those in the now-fictional Dunham-Obama-Soetoro camp, the wikipedia.org biographies of Stanley Ann Dunham, Lolo Soetoro, Stanley Armour Dunham, Madelyn Dunham, and others had drastically changed through deceptive editing.

In the case of the above-referenced camp, it is apparent that the 2008 pre-election biographies were designed to portray Obama’s (aka Soetoro, et al) relatives in a dignified, even iconic light by claiming historical/blood relationships to politicians, historical figures, actors, and other media celebrities. The myths first by Obama were first debunked through detailed examination of his genealogy, his published birth/adoption documents, and innumerable photos that progressively appeared out of thin air, as the basic genealogical stories were written and rewritten in realtime.

These biographies had since been edited to counter research which revealed countless inconsistencies in the timelines, characterizations, and myths that Obama (aka Soetoro, et al) and (now) his White House handlers had concocted to hide his non-citizenship and his true identity. Obama, himself, has challenged one iota of new research, yet he and his handlers have recently determined that the most effective way to counter damning information is to incorporate it into the revised biographies.

While virtually no legitimate information had previously existed in the original biographies, they have now taken on a new life. However, in the process of regrouping for damage control, additional errors have been made, the the addition of out-of-place facts (new lies) that have suddenly been inserted into the official stories, even contradicting the original foundational premises. The average American may be confused—even disinterested—about the truth who Barack Obama (aka Barry Soetoro, et al) really is. Many will recognize the technique called “lying by omission” which has been used liberally by the Obama camp.

In order to further promote the Obama myth, Dreams from My Father is now required reading in schools across the U.S., officially signaling the “War on Truth.”

Perpetuation of the original myth is the primordial objective
With lawsuits pursuing the Obama (aka Soetoro, et al) camp from virtually every imaginable direction, it has been reported that at least $950,000 had spent in attempts at quashing, delaying, or dismissing those suits before the presidential inauguration. The actual amount could easily be ten time the stated amount.

The lawsuits are demanding that Obama (aka Soetoro, et al) provide legitimate (i.e. not fraudulent or forged) documentation that he is a natural born citizen of the United States, as required by the U.S. Constitution. Documents provided by Obama’s campaign team, as recently admitted by White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, were posted on the Obama campaign’s Internet web site as a representation of fact.

Out of this backdrop came Barack Obama (aka Barry Soetoro, et al). The family that is responsible for his manufacture has been mentioned throughout this series of articles. through the recognition of Hegel’s philosophical, dialectical teachings and their application by Karl Marx, the author will reveal the true father of Barack Obama (aka Soetoro, et al). May they finally be known [See below.]

Michael Clark Rockefeller: “Art collector and honorary, still photographer and documentary film sound recordist”
Michael Clark Rockefeller (1938-1961), the second son of Nelson A. Rockefeller (former governor of New York and U.S. vice-president appointed by Gerald R. Ford) graduated from Harvard University (summa cum laude) in 1960 as an anthropologist. [Note the aforementioned reference to Stanley Ann Dunham-Obama-Soetoro having received a masters degree in anthropology.]

Although Michael C. Rockefeller was purported to have attended Manhattan’s Buckley School, a private, all-boys school (K-9), it is vague as to whether he completed his high-school education prior to attending Harvard. questions arise regarding his whereabouts during the period after his 9th-grade graduation to his enrollment at Harvard, and again, after receiving his anthropology degree.

Though Rockefeller majored in anthropology, something in his background gave him enough expertise to be credited as the sound recordist for Robert Gardner’s documentary film, Dead Birds. Was it his family’s immense wealth, or was it a pretense for a subsequent, necessary disappearance, due to unforeseen circumstances? The film is described as an anthropological study of the Dani Lani tribe of the Southern Highlands area of western Papua, New Guinea and their spiritual nemeses, a neighboring tribe. The film was also touted to be an anthropological study of primitive cultures and was Harvard-Peabody Museum-funded co-production, filmed in 1961 and released three years later, in 1964.

[Post-production of a major theatrical film generally concludes within 3-6 months after filming is complete, or within a predetermined contractual timeframe. Professional film-production funding usually involves a completion bond which requires the film to be ready for distribution within a specified time period. In the case of this documentary film and its lack of special effects, three years is an inordinate amount of time for editing the film.]

Reviews of the film routinely mischaracterize the Dani and other Indonesian tribes as “headhunters” and “cannibals,” though the 83-minute film presents a totally contradictory portrait. Since the majority of the film is narrated in English, we are only privy to the interpretations of its director and producer. One is left with the everlasting impression that the Dani are simply engaged in a ‘tit-for-tat’ battle for spiritual supremacy over their neighbors.

Clearly, one can determine that the Dani are a close-knit society, artistic, creative, musically talented, and fierce warriors. But unlike their counterparts in ‘civilized’ society, their motivations for revenging the deaths of their warriors, women, and innocent children are entirely spiritual in nature. Aside from launching a spear, arrow, or dart beyond the established territorial boundaries, the Dani and their enemies, if ever, encroach upon each other’s land.

From a production viewpoint, the proximity of the film’s crew to their subjects clearly demonstrated a lack of concern or fear for one’s safety. The lulls between tribal battles are interspersed with celebrations of life and death, preparations for battle, and a close-up look at the chief’s ability to craft a talisman in honor of a fallen tribe member. At one point in the film, the chief gifts certain members of the tribe with the possessions of the deceased, before taking up the act of revenge on his/her behalf. Truly, these are a very spiritual people, and not the “cannibals” so often portrayed in Western accounts. Michael Rockefeller was in no danger being near these people. Neither was anyone else in the crew.

The tribe’s predominately vegetarian diet belied the characterizations of ‘cannibalism’, though it appears that the Dani Lani occasionally ate meat. Human meat? Highly unlikely and a gross exaggeration. Headhunters? Yes, but no more so than those who foment world wars or intrusions into foreign lands under the pretext of ‘spreading democracy’.

Michael Clark Rockefeller: “Eaten by crocodiles, sharks, headhunters,” or a Marxist plot to overthrow the U.S.A.?
Upon discovering that Michael C. Rockefeller had mysteriously disappeared after the filming of Dead Birds, the author immediately recognized a missing puzzle piece in the implausible saga of Barack Obama, Jr. (aka Barry Soetoro, et al). Further research into Rockefeller’s disappearance also substantiated intuitive hunches that would eventually explain how and why Obama should inherit an elite education beyond his family’s financial means, enormous sums in political contributions, and an improbable, but unimpeded path to the presidency of the United States of America.

Under the pretext of completing business with the Asmat tribes of western New Guinea, it is claimed that Rockefeller joined Dutch anthropologist Rene Wassing to pick up artifacts destined to become part of a Rockefeller museum in New York. Rockefeller had allegedly prepaid handsomely for some Asmat native carvings—as much as ten axes for the items. It was rumored that two axes were worth a tribal wife. Rockefeller’s ten axes earned him the equivalent of five wives. Rockefeller also finance his museum collection with knives and blades, all valuable woodworking tools to be cherished by the Asmat craftsmen. On this trip to retrieve the Asmat carvings, their 40-foot dugout canoe, powered by a single outboard motor, allegedly capsized, leaving the two men clinging for life.

It is at this point in the tale that facts diverge, the first detailing the account of two native guides who swam ashore to summon help. A second account failed to mention the guides, who were originally presumed to have failed in reaching the shore. Both accounts, however, claim that Michael C. Rockefeller, fearing the worst, made a valiant attempt to swim ashore. Legend has it that he never reached the shore and was likely “eaten by crocodiles, sharks, or cannibals” Wassing was rescued the following day and informed of Rockefeller’s disappearance—or was he? Wassing (or the author of this tale) left us with the melodramatic “I think I can make it...” parting statement made by Rockefeller before he swam to his inevitable demise. The intense sports program promoted by The Buckley School would have prepared him for the arduous swim—even at the ripe old age of 23.

The search for Michael Rockefeller was launched—or was it?
According to some sources, Nelson Rockefeller was urge by his wife, Mary Todhunter Rockefeller, to launch a massive search for their missing son. His eventual refusal was base on an unwillingness to ruin his chances for a successful career in politics. What father, other than a Rockefeller, would place a potential political career before his missing son? Was there something else that Nelson Rockefeller could (or would) not divulge, even to his wife—the mother of his son?

[This version of the story was likely that promoted by author Paul Toohey in his book, “Rockefeller Goes West,” and the Rockefellers had to debunk it before it grew legs. The validity of Toohey’s account may have been significant.]

The first dimension of Michael Rockefeller’s disappearance was publicized as an unfortunate accident, though it was likely something that might have become a huge embarrassment to the entire Rockefeller clan, a major scandal which could conceivably derail Nelson Rockefeller’s future political aspirations. On the surface, it may have seemed like a plausible reason for not devoting too much time in the for his son, though his initial response, if accurate, certainly hints that Nelson knew more than he was willing to reveal.

Time magazine reported that Nelson Rockefeller, upon learning of his son’s demise, “chartered a private pane at a cost of $38,000,” thereby launching a 10-day search in Indonesia for his missing son. A miracle occurred, and Rene Wassing was found, clinging to the capsized wreckage of their now, “30-foot-long dugout canoe.” In the so-called film footage of the search and rescue which appeared in a 1977 TV series, “in Search of,” Michael Rockefeller, the documentary was produced on black and white film, though the rest of the broadcast was in color. Coincidentally, Dead Birds was also filmed in color—”in 1961.” So, after investing a fortune in chartering a private flight, we must naively conclude that Nelson Rockefeller could not afford to document the search and rescue of his missing son on color film.

Considering his brother, Laurance Rockefeller’s majority stock holdings in Eastern Airlines and McDonnel Douglas (a military contractor), Nelson could have easily asked (and probably did) for several planes and helicopters to assist with the search and rescue mission. This dimension of the story is ludicrous, if not totally implausible.

The Time article went on to describe how an empty gasoline can that Michael Rockefeller strapped to his back (for buoyancy) was located 120 miles down the coast from where Wassing was rescued.

It is said that Mary divorced Nelson over the issue, and many years later, hired a private investigator to search for her still-missing son. the investigator failed to find Michael, but brought back three human skulls alleged to have belonged to white men killed by New Guinea tribesmen. According to one of Mrs. Rockefeller’s personal aides, the three skulls “resolved a few issues,” though it was not disclosed to the investigator if any of the skulls was Michael’s.

The investigator had been summoned to the home of Mary Rockefeller upon his return from New Guinea. After eating dinner and sharing details about the expedition, Mary handed her temporary employee an envelope containing the agreed upon sum of $250,000, and he departed. this account demonstrates that Mary Rockefeller did not know the truth about her son’s disappearance, and that Nelson know much more than he revealed.

“in Search of” Michael Rockefeller
Actor Leonard Nimoy narrated a TV documentary entitled “in Search of” Michael Rockefeller, (Season One, Episode 23, 1977) based on the disappearance of Michael Rockefeller. The episode detailed Rockefeller’s obsession with the Asmat culture and his love for their woodworking skills and their works of art. After referencing Michael’s participation as the sound recordist and still photographer of the Dead Birds film, Nimoy went on to describe the ill-fated trip to the land of the Asmats (tree people) of New Guinea.

A review of the film’s closing credits revealed that Michael C. Rockefeller was not the still photographer for the film. Why would that exaggeration have been made? The answer to this question will be found in the photograph below.

Photo 2-A, The ‘ghost’ of Michael Rockefeller visits the Dani tribe
It has become increasingly obvious that Marxist-Hegelian dialectical psy-ops are still alive and well. As in the fraudulent photos of the Dunham/Obama/Soetoro clan, this photo of New Guinea’s Dani Lani tribesmen has been ridiculously doctored and is another forgery to add to the ever-growing collection. This time, however, it points directly to the Rockefellers. Of note, the presence of “Michael Rockefeller” in this photo is intended to substantiate the foundation of his disappearance by representing that he was ‘there’.

Another “Photoshop job,” the image of an alleged “Michael Clark Rockefeller” was inserted into a frame extracted from Dead Birds, the film in which he was credited as “sound recordist.” In case the reader considers this analysis to be absurd, the inserted image of the white man sitting among primitive tribal warriors is not even that of Michael Rockefeller!

Notice how the camera, leather wristwatch band, and even the usually black-framed glasses worn by Rockefeller have become a dull gray. A subject has also been Photoshopped into the picture adjacent to Rockefeller’s right arm, and his hair, unlike his fellow tribesmen, has turned gray. Why would it have become necessary to insert an imposter into this photo? The simple answer, as always, is “Because that person was not there in the first place!”

The photo (above) was a recent fabrication, ironically mirroring the same inadequacies of the Dunham/Obama/Soetoro clan photos, further evidenced by the existence of a color documentary film produced three years after its purported production date. A close-up look at the camera and “Rockefeller’s left hand and arm demonstrate previously-seen anachronistic objects, (i.e. the make/model of the camera), disproportionate body parts, and inexplicable shadowing that have no business being there at all.

Photo 2-B, The ‘ghost’ of Michael Rockefeller materializes in front of the ‘ghosts’ of the Dani tribe
In the 2nd segment of the “in Search of” Michael Rockefeller episode, this photo of Michael Rockefeller appeared after his unsuccessful rescue, which allegedly lasted 13 days. Notice how Rockefeller’s previously

bleached-out appearance [See Photo 2-A above] suddenly has changed, though this image represents the same still photograph.

This image, the focal point of the TV show, reveals extreme pixelation of the two tribesmen supposedly sitting behind Michael. Their images have also been intentionally darkened and appear to be generated from a projection screen.

This photo is another compilation, visible by the restoration of the previously-lightened frames on his glasses, and the return of the darker portions of the camera lens.

Artificial highlights have been added to the top and back of his hair, which has become much darker in contrast with his skin and with the previous photo. Notice the sudden appearance of a large shadow on his right cheek and neck—a shadow not visible in Photo 2-A. Can you say, “FRAUD?”

Photo 3-A, The Dead Birds ‘Crew’
Posing for this Photoshop masterpiece are the team from the Dead Birds documentary. In familiar fashion, replete with distorted limbs, unnatural poses, strange shadow, and the layering of images, one on top of the other, we see a half-smiling Michael Rockefeller, now sporting a beard (front row, R). Careful examination of

the various subjects’ head sizes reveals that the fellow who compiled the Punahou School photos [See Part 6] graced us with another one of his farsighted compilations.

Despite the unusually large distance between those seated in the front row, the chap standing at the far left is able to rest his hand on the shoulder of the man seated in front of him. Though his upper arm remains vertical, his forearm, bent at the elbow, is able to span a distance that appears to be at least 5-10 feet from those seated in the front row.

The heas of each subject vary in size from 25-50%, the little boy’s (squatting, front row, L) head being nearly as large as the full-grown man sitting behind him.

Mysterious shadows appear under the seats of three subjects, legs are of competing length on the same bodies, and 40% of the film crew still have not learned the technique of looking at the camera when a photo is about to be taken. the subject (front row, Center) appears to be resting his left foot on the tree limb in the foreground. Actually, the limb is a visual prop that has been added to the photo, as has the same left leg and foot of the same individual. This magic foot is floating in the air, and there is a slight gap between the sole of his boot and tree limb, which is visible upon enlargement.

Photo 3-B, The Dead Birds ‘Crew’ and some ‘extra’ legs

This photo (at the left) has been brightened by adjusting the contrast. Objects which have been compiled will now reveal some abnormalities that should not be there. If there is a photo that can cause you to question your own sanity, this one will. Virtually every subject has been compiled into this image, including the trees tin the foreground. One can see that some shades of clothing stand out unnaturally, as do the various skin tones of each subject.

Look closely at the three men sitting in the middle of the front row. Behind each chair are two lower legs with dark trousers wearing boots. Missing from the photo are the bodies that should be attached to those three sets of booted shins.

Notice how Michael Rockefeller’s boots gleam in the bright shadows. Also missing from the photo is the real Michael Rockefeller.

Heading out in a “makeshift catamaran” (previously described as a 40-foot dugout canoe), Michael Rockefeller set out to visit the Asmat (tree people) tribe of New Guinea immediately upon completion of the pre-production phase of Dead Birds. Accompanied by Dutch anthropologist Rene Wassing, the two men and their native escorts (from the Dani tribe?) found themselves clinging to their capsized boat which had been overturned by a “violent wave.” Nimoy’s narration, written by producer Alex Pamasanoff, sounded hopeful at times, only to become evermore gloomy as each segment progressed.

The rescue operation (according to Time) “launched and spearheaded by Nelson Rockefeller” was carefully scripted to reinforce the lie that Michael Rockefeller “had drown, was eaten by crocodiles, sharks or (protein-starved) cannibals.” Someone had to survive in order to relate the story to the public, and Rene Wassing was selected for the role.

Nimoy’s narration seemed to disagree with key aspects of the Time account, specifically stating:

Nimoy: When Dutch authorities finally learned of the accident, a full-scale search was launched immediately. Searchers combed over coastal rivers and seemingly endless stands of dense jungle shoreline. the region below was hostile and forbidding. The coastline was a muddy swamp with estuaries where crocodiles prowled. Beyond lay spongy tangles of Sago palms and mangroves, alive with poisonous snakes, scorpions, and swarms of mosquitoes. The Asmat had named their home, “the land of lapping death.” Suddenly—a miracle. A flying boat had found Rene Wassing, still clinging to the capsized catamaran more than 20 miles out to sea. Stunned and exhausted, Wassing told reporters of the ordeal. he had tried, unsuccessfully, to dissuade Michael from attempting the swim to shore. Michael’s last words were, “I think I can make it.” Now the massive search effort concentrated on Michael.

As the program continued, shots of Nelson Rockefeller fending off swarms of reporters and security personnel in New York provided a backdrop for Nimoy’s continued narration.

Nimoy: The news that his son was lost had taken 3 days to reach Governor Rockefeller. Stunned and disoriented, he tried his best to deal with an endless onslaught of questions.

Nelson Rockefeller: I’m headed out there.... hopefully I find him before we get there.... but, to be there.... uhhhhh, when they do find him, bit there’s anything I can do.... I will.

[“Hopefully I find him before we get there” (?) What does that mean, exactly? The reader should bear in mind that the aforementioned Time magazine article specifically labeled Wassing as an “ethnologist,” not quite the same as an anthropologist.]

A dramatic search and rescue operation, which appeared in the film as frantic vignettes of swirling water and propeller-driven waves on otherwise-peaceful lagoons, was captured on black and white film (or a de-colorized version) and inserted into the made-for-TV color production, a gratuitous, psychological contribution intended to foster a reminiscence of bygone days. Finally, the miracle for which everyone had prayed arrived.

Rene Wassing was found still clinging to the wrecked catamaran after “22 hours and more than 20 miles at sea.” Suspiciously, the wreckage was completely absent from the film, as were Wassing’s, by now, water-logged clothes. The expression on Wassing’s face belied the seriousness of the situation. Rather than looking exhausted and overcome by exposure, he enthusiastically asserted to a bevy of journalists and news-media hacks who just so happened to arrive at this remote location “more than 20 miles out at sea,” that he tried to dissuade Michael Rockefeller from attempting the swim to shore.

Under normal circumstances, a victim of prolonged exposure at sea would likely require immediate emergency medical aid, but not Wassing. Who arranged the press conference for him? Yes, his companion was a famous person, and he, too, deserved to be rescued, that is, if he was missing. But someone else determined that a few clowns with cameras and microphones deserved their scoop, now, didn’t they? And how did these media goons just so happen to find themselves more than 20 miles at sea and 20 miles from the nearest jungle? It was too perfect to be believed, yet everybody bought it.

Wassing needed no time to catch his breath, dry off, change his clothes, or eat a meal. He must have been suffering from extreme exposure, both from the sunlight and the saltwater, which could have caused him to become dehydrated, even delirious. But he remained patient and awaited the help he was promised. This author can clearly see why he failed when he “tried to dissuade Michael Rockefeller from attempting the swim to shore.” Michael did not by his argument, largely because Michael Rockefeller was not even there. If Michael Rockefeller was not there, then the event could not have occurred. How does anyone know that this is true? Michael Rockefeller was absent from the (aforementioned) pictures.

Despite the catamaran capsizing in rough seas, the two men “began salvaging whatever they could use as a buoy to keep them afloat.” But no, the show must go on! Wassing was more than willing to accommodate his propagandist suitors, and he was not going to disappoint them. Neither would the officials, when they later claimed to have conveniently found an empty gas can that Michael had used for flotation, 120 miles down the shoreline.

How can anyone now say, after 47 years, that Michael Rockefeller did not drown, was not “eaten by crocodiles,” was not “eaten by sharks,” and was not “eaten by headhunting cannibals?” The simple answer is: “Because he was not there.” The photos prove it—and so does the story. One survivor was rescued after a 40-foot catamaran capsized, yet the overturned wreckage was nowhere in sight. the only wreckage onto which that lone had to cling was his story. It was his role, and he was just the messenger. And the search and rescue was nothing more than a staged event—a hoax.

Photo 4-A, The Flying-boat Rescue

“More than 20 miles out to sea,” we see the “flying boat” that rescued Michael Rockefeller’s persuasive companion, Rene Wassing. Is that the wreckage of the capsize catamaran just to the left of the plane? If it is, then the land has also drifted more than 20 miles in the opposite direction (out to sea). This was Stage One of the Michael C. Rockefeller hoax designed to convince the public he was eaten by creatures with fins, fingers, and lots of sharp teeth. Imagine a ‘mainstream media’ that failed to question why the rescue site was not “20 miles out to sea” and is only a few hundred yards from land. The media’s job was not to find and report the truth—just sell the story, no matter how ridiculous it was. The sad thing is—it worked.

Photo 4-B, Rene Wassing Awaits Reporters’ Arrival

In Photo 4-B, we see a not-so-disheveled Rene Wassing awaiting the press corps who just happened to be ready to interview him on the heels of a ‘miracle’. Wassing gingerly balances himself on an airplane pontoon after spending 22 hours at sea, clinging to a capsized catamaran (previously described as a 40-foot dugout canoe), while avoiding being eaten by sharks.

Sharks have an incredible sense of smell, and even they could tell that something smelled rotten—too rotten to eat.

Photo 4-C, Rene Wassing Prepares for an Impromptu Press Conference at the Scene of a ‘Miracle’

Here, we again see a nimble Rene Wassing reaching for a prop he supposedly used to hold onto for dear life. Considering the ‘miracle’ which allegedly occurred, the bystanders seem almost disinterested. if it had not been for Wassing, who would have been willing to spin such a yarn for his task masters?

© 2009 Don Nicoloff, Direct Light Productions, The Idaho Observer

directlightproductions.com

[In order to minimize download time, this article has been divided into 2 parts: 7-A and 7-B]

To continue reading Part 7-B, an in-depth analysis of why Michael Rockefeller’s death was faked, click your computer’s mouse here.

The Three Stooges go to Washington, Part 6

Sat, 25 Apr 2009 23:11:18 -0400

Barack Obama: The Pictures Speak A Thousand Lies

By Don Nicoloff
April 25, 2009

In spite of all the hoopla following the election of "America's first black president," Barack Obama has yet to offer any legitimate documentation proving that he was born in the United States. Nothing. Nada. Niente. Rien. Gar nichts. And don't expect him to anytime soon.

As was previously covered in Parts 4 and 5 of this serial article, Obama's Certificate of Live Birth is fraudulent. No amount of posturing or grandstanding by public officials, senators, Congressmen, and the mainstream media can fix it. His Selective Service Registration is equally bogus—an embarrassment to its creator, at best.

And Barack Obama's so-called adoption by a so-called stepfather from Indonesia who married his so-called mother from Kansas is marred by the prerequisite forgery of signatures. A cursory examination of Stanley Ann Dunham's Mercer Island High School yearbook and the Indonesian adoption papers reveals distinctly different longhand writing styles. Dunham's yearbook signature predates the adoption papers by at least three years and should be considered genuine for purposes of forensic examination. The Indonesian signature is totally inconsistent with multiple samples obtained from her high school yearbook. Even a child could determine that the adoption papers are forged and fraudulent.

Claims by Hawaii's Secretary of State, its governor, or other officials asserting they have examined and then sealed Obama's records are equally disingenuous, misleading, and corrupt. If Barack Obama possessed any legitimate documentation of any kind, he would have willingly presented it for publication, and then his problems—or his nightmare—would have been over. His handlers obviously underestimated the tenacity and the discernment of those able to see through the deception.

Attempts to procure any semblance of a transcript from Hawaii's Punahou School, Occidental College, Columbia University, or the Harvard University Law School have met with equally dubious excuses, implying that something about Obama's transcripts hold some kind of sacred dispensation. Even the world's true Messiah had His life documented in a book for all to read. Obama's non-history is sealed like a pickle in a Mason jar. Are we to assume that Obama, the "Christian," retains a rank even above that of Christ? Let's not fool ourselves for too long, folks.

Therefore, one can only conclude that in the absence of any genuine documentation, if Barack Obama cannot prove that he was born on United States soil (and he cannot), the documents he has presented to the usually "unreliable" Internet and the less-than-unreliable mainstream media are a fraud perpetrated upon the whole world. It will not be the first time such a fraud has been committed, though this is one time when the perpetrator(s) are being called to task.

The media's relentless crusade to foster adoration for their illegitimate, favorite icon has become a disgusting orgy of pretension. Since the old images (photographs) of Obama's childhood have become mildly suspect, the media has been entrusted with the duty of creating new ones, turning every political speech, diplomatic event, and public appearance into a low-grade fashion show. Ever prepared to dutifully pounce on the author of the latest Obama exposé, the mainstream media begins their relentless attacks with the usual, not-so-subtle references to the Internet, conveniently forgetting to mention that Obama ran his political campaign there, including the publication of his bogus genealogical portfolio.

It stands to reason that if Obama's 'official' documents are fraudulent, then the photographs which supposedly chronicle his life history must also be fraudulent. They would have to be. Yet the media—and the law—have conveniently disregarded what will become crystal clear before the conclusion of this fourth chapter—or shall we say, "exposé"—about the mythological character known as Barack Obama.

Digital technology's role in the creation of illusion: A digital primer
Human beings are sentient creatures by nature. We have feelings, senses, and in extreme cases, awareness. Impediments to our awareness (illusions) are created by any number of means. The most common forms of illusion are employed in order to artificially imbalance or control one or more of our senses. Is it any wonder why the realm of digital technology is called "artificial intelligence?" Artificial intelligence is not real intelligence, and it never will be.

The intentional imbalance and manipulation of our natural senses leads us into the realm of mind control, the preferred method of subjugating the masses. Repetition is a critical component in the creation of a belief system, and those who would enslave us are implicitly aware of that fact. The effectiveness of advertising is but one example. The assault on our sight and hearing is relentless. Pictures (both moving and still) and sounds (words, music, and special effects) are employed in order to influence our thoughts and emotions. It is upon this foundation that a belief system (mind control) is built. Unfortunately, many can no longer differentiate between reality and illusion.

Artificial imagery is another critical component of any illusory system. Hollywood has turned illusion into an art form, even a religion, through the creation of stories, images, symbols, and special effects (FX) designed to validate what would otherwise be considered impossible. By exploiting the suggestibility of the subconscious mind as a foundation, movie makers cause viewers to willingly substitute illusion for reality. Through the unconscious acceptance of special FX as reality, the natural senses and rational thinking capacity come under further assault and subjugation.

Sensory and emotional overload
Music plays an equally prominent role in the creation of illusion. Since music intrinsically touches one's emotions, its role has become essential in the production of movies, documentaries, TV programs, commercials, and events of an 'official' nature. Musical scores are the glue that binds the characters, events, and special FX together into a complete, 'larger-than-life' package. Music will cause one to love the protagonist and to hate the antagonist. Music will cause one to love, laugh, feel patriotic, anticipate danger, mourn, or experience fear. Today's average moviegoer is typically unaware of the psychological role that music plays in controlling his/her emotions and ultimately, the mind.

Despite the apparent advantages available via digital technology, there exist a few disadvantages. Through one's discernment, one can recognize anomalies in an artificial reality through the use of the natural senses. Artificial scents, sounds, and images are distinctly different from natural ones. Certain fruit-scented cosmetics, incense, candles, and perfumes emit odors of a chemical nature. At best, such products can only imitate what occurs in nature.

Likewise, synthesized music can only approximate what occurs in the realm of natural acoustics. A trained musical ear can easily distinguish between the natural sound of an acoustic (analog) instrument and a digital reproduction of the same sound. Because human hearing is analog in nature, one can feel that artificial sounds are unnatural. Digital sound creation, though dramatically improved during the past ten years, still lacks the fundamental qualities found in nature. The author happens to be an expert in both the acoustic and digital modalities.

Artificial images have been incorporated into TV commercials, movies, documentary films, signs, and even the Internet. Depending on the desired end result, these images may challenge our discernment, ultimately blurring the line between illusion and reality.

Digital technologies do offer alternative methods in the recording, reproduction, and dissemination of information, but those methods are not without fault. Because digital technologies use numbers as the foundation for processing information, they can facilitate the gathering, compilation, and retrieval of that information at incredible speeds. However, speed does not necessarily translate in quality, nor accuracy. One can hear a glitch in a music recording or see visual distortion in a film if the information becomes corrupted during the process of recording, replication, or while being played back.

Finally, live musical performance has been gradually replaced by prerecorded music, enabling the embedding of subliminal sounds with messages intended to affect one's subconscious mind. The typical solo artist performing on a stage with an 'invisible' band or orchestra is now accepted, unfortunately, as a legitimate substitute for the real thing.

Advances in digital photography
Photographic techniques also exhibit similar characteristics to those described above. The method of capturing images on light-sensitive film and the development and transfer of those images to photo-chemically-sensitive paper has gradually been replaced by the digital process of capturing, reproducing, and replicating images to be viewed on a screen or transferred (printed) on a variety of paper stock. A digital camera can even transfer an electronic representation of a photo without it ever having been printed. With today's technologies, photos can even be created without the use of a traditional camera.

The digital age has introduced a gradual progression of technologies, including FAX machines, copiers, scanners, and computer programs which enable further manipulation of original photographs and documents. Images can be electronically masked, and their content can be edited or compiled at will. Though the technique of photographic manipulation serves a variety of commercially viable purposes, it can also be (and quite often is) used for deception—not just in advertising, motion pictures, and television programs—but also in the mainstream news.

Unlike the standard 'retouching' of photos which removes blemishes from the subject(s) within a photo, digital photography facilitates alteration of the content, in whole or in part, of a photographic event. Photoshop is a computer program with such capabilities. Separate images can be (and are) combined, as a compilation, to give the appearance that an event (the photograph) was captured with one click of a camera's shutter. The viewer assumes the photograph was a real event because it appears to have been taken at a school, an airport, or in a park. Why would anyone fake such an event? The only plausible answer to that question would be, "because the event never occurred in the first place."

Human vision, being analog in nature, compensates for differences in focal points by adjusting the eyes' lenses to focus on a particular object (or objects) being viewed. Traditional photography, equally analog in nature, employs lenses and mirrors to focus, enlarge, or reduce the size or distance of an object, i.e. the subject(s) within a photograph. Light filters placed in front of a camera's lens aid in producing special effects which are automatically transferred to the film within the camera.

On the other hand, computerized photography has certain advantages that allow for a myriad of additional post-production possibilities. Photos can be altered by an infinite combination of special FX, including focal point adjustment, color saturation/removal, hue, contrast, brightness, sharpness, distortion, and the addition/subtraction of original objects, etc.

A few disadvantages found in digital media
Digital photography, in the hands of an inexperienced or sloppy manipulator, has its own unique limitations. Advances in computer software have introduced new techniques in photo editing, yet, despite those advances, digitally produced photographs still do not measure up to the sensitivity of a discerning human (analog) eye. Imperfections and manipulations reappear during enlargement (zooming in), due to the enlargement of the pixels themselves.

When digitally enlarged, a computerized photo first begins to distort at the junction(s) of two or more differing colors, including different, adjacent objects. For example, a photo of an airplane with the background of a blue sky will begin to reveal square pixels along the outer edges of the wings, fuselage, tail, cockpit, etc. when enlarged. A white cloud will begin to pixellate at the same time as the airplane. However, if the airplane is inserted (as a composite) into a photo of a blue sky with the aforementioned cloud, the plane will likely pixellate before the cloud, revealing the composite nature of the photo. Pixels appear as square boxes when enlarged in a digital medium. Pixellation can alternately be referred to as 'bitmap distortion' and can be minimized by a technique called 'pixel interpolation', which artificially blends adjacent colors at higher zoom levels.

Video photography also suffers from the same phenomena, though the movie industry has, long ago, dealt with those issues by doubling the film capacity from 35 mm to 70 mm reducing the pixel distortion on large theatrical screens. 70 mm film actually uses 65 mm for the images, and the extra 5 mm are used for producing multi-channel sound, i.e. Dolby surround, THX, etc.

Audio recordings inherently suffer from the same digital issues for similar reasons. Human hearing is analog in nature, and a trained ear can still hear the difference between an analog and a digital recording. As sampling frequencies increase, distortion becomes less apparent. Noise can be completely eliminated from the human audio spectrum, though increases in volume reveal similar types of distortion. The process of 'dithering' converts the higher sampling rates to the standard 16-bit format which can then be read by the majority of computer-based disc drives, or CD and DVD players. Technology has yet to match the capabilities of the human body. As with the trained eye, a trained ear can perceive the mechanical nature of digital sound, though that gap is being reduced through software updates, faster processing, and modeling synthesis.

Virtually all photo editing programs leave a telltale signature within a digital photograph, and Photoshop is one. The Photoshop signature even includes the program's version number and in some cases, the date and time the photo was created, though this information is not generally seen when viewing the image in the normal manner. Digital pictures contain imbedded text files which can be viewed separately from the image file.

Though Photoshop is probably one of the more popular and versatile photo editing programs, it is not perfect. It cannot simulate certain lens phenomena, such as 'depth of field'. A trained, naked eye can spot a Photoshop compilation in a heartbeat. Since a photo compilation represents multiple subjects at different points in space and time, the original images will most likely have been photographed with different cameras, differing focal points, different lighting conditions, and a host of other anomalies that will become evident upon close inspection. Barack Obama's 'family' photos are no exception to this rule.

The Dunham clan photo composites
The family photos of Barack Hussein Muhammed Obama released for mainstream and alternative media publication on television, in newspapers, magazines, campaign literature, and on internet web sites are, without a doubt, composite misrepresentations of fact. The overwhelming majority of those photos are recreations intended to mislead the viewer(s) in concluding that Stanley Ann Dunham is his American birth mother, and that Stanley Armour Dunham and Madelyn Lee (Payne) Dunham are his maternal grandparents.

The following analysis of these photos is the first to have been conducted by anyone searching for the truth about Barack Obama's true origins. Again, simple logic dictates: "Bogus documents, bogus photographs." There exists no other conclusion.

Through careful forensic study of the now-popular photos of Obama's 'family', it is evident that all of those published photos representing Obama's childhood days, purportedly taken in Indonesia, Africa, the Punahou School in Hawaii, Occidental College in Los Angeles, CA, Columbia University in New York, NY and elsewhere, have been doctored through the use of photo editing software -- predominantly Photoshop 3.0.8.

The conclusions drawn from a careful study of the aforementioned photographs are based upon those sloppy, composite fabrications which are replete with numerous anomalies that defy nature, physics, and reason. Shadows present in those photos behave erratically and are often totally and mysteriously absent under normal lighting conditions.

Contrarily, some of those photographs also have shadows where none would naturally exist in the most extraordinary circumstances. Those shadows have been added to the photographs to obfuscate or hide visible imperfections, due to the fraudulent methods in which the photographs were created. Composite photographs, when reduced (compressed) in size, often hide those imperfections. Upon enlarging the photographs by zooming in, one begins to see the anomalies appear with ever-increasing clarity. Pixellation begins to occur at a given point in any computerized photographic-enlargement procedure, often revealing which objects represent the more fraudulent elements of composition.

Let it suffice to say that if Barack Obama's 'official' document representations are fraudulent (and they are), then his photographic representations must also be fraudulent—and they are. The composite photos reveal additional anomalies that become quite obvious, once one understands what to look for.

In addition to the untimely pixellation which occurs during enlargement, the photo contents are replete with unnatural artifacts. Objects appear to move in and out from one another, lines or light appear around some or all of the objects, and some of the human subjects have three arms, three hands, unusually large heads, or multi-colored (not matching) shoes, shirts, jackets, or trousers.

(See: "The Three Stooges go to Washington, Part 3," The Idaho Observer, and on this web site for the original publication and preliminary analysis of the following photos within that article.)

Photo 1

The photo above is intended to legitimize the Dunham family story and is the only one
published of Stanley Ann Dunham as an infant. But is it really Stanley Ann in this photo?

Photo 1: Analysis
Notice that Stanley Ann's head is larger than her mother's and is out of proportion with the rest of her tiny body. In fact, as represented in the photo, her head is nearly the size of her father's. Those three anomalies, alone, confirm that this photo is a compilation.

Contrasting shadows, skin tones, and objects that are intentionally obscured are revealed by modifying various light aspects of this computerized collage of three separate photos. All three subjects demonstrate differing focal points derived from a single camera, and the lighting casts opposing shadows typically found in such fabrications.

All three subjects' eyes are focused in different directions, further indicating that each subject was photographed in different settings at different times.

Stanley Armour Dunham's overall appearance is gray and outside the light parameters of the rest of the photo. Notice how his tie casts a dark shadow behind his tie, indicating the light is shining from the left side of the photo. However, the right side of his face (that which faces the direction of the light) is obscured within a shadow. If the shadow was created by the light approaching from the left, his tie, his shirt, and his chin would be obscured by his daughter's head. But it is not being obscured by her head, evidenced by the singular shadow behind the tie. Therefore, the tie’s shadow is foreign to any lighting effects present in the overall portrait, disqualifying Stanley Armour’s image

Though his wife's and daughter's faces are illuminated by foreground light, his chin and throat are enveloped by a shadow that should not exist. And though his tie casts a shadow to the right, the left side of his head and face do not. In order to blend these three separate photos into a single compilation, shadowing effects were employed to hide this photo's fraudulent nature.

Photo 1-A

Photo 1-A: Analysis
The photo above represents a digital copy of “Photo 1,” which has been purposely edited (by the author) in order to accentuate the obvious discrepancies in shadows, light angles, and background manipulations intended to mask the compilation of three separate subjects (photos) and several special FX. By reducing white/black-point ratios of the original photograph, the author has revealed where the composite 'blending' is actually occurring. The darker blue portions reveal where light anomalies occur due to the layering of three different photographic images within the same digital photograph.

Image layering is a special effect available to Photoshop artists and is commonly used to create advertising media or motion picture special FX. It’s use is considered to be ‘creative’ in nature, though it can be (and often is) used to create fraudulent images, such as Photo 1 (above).

Photo 1-B

Photo 1-B: Analysis
The above photo (an exact digital copy in which the author has altered the gamma, contrast, and exposure levels) demonstrates a few additional anomalies worth pointing out. Madelyn Dunham appears to be wearing a uniform, possibly that of an airline stewardess. Below her right lapel is a number or ID badge. The tuft of hair behind her left ear is distinctively different in color than the rest of her head. Notice that her hair is parted on the left side, yet in many other photos, she parts her hair on the right side. [The author has seen only two photos where Madelyn Dunham parts her hair on the left side of her head.]

Stanley Ann appears to be sitting in a wooden high chair which, based on the perspectives of her parents, would mean her head is reaching a height approaching five feet. Next to her left arm is an abnormal representation of Stanley Armour's U.S. Army shirt pocket. The pocket is not sewn on straight, it is much darker than the rest of his shirt, and the pocket's material below the button is of a different texture. His ribbon bar is also pinned onto the shirt in a sloppy manner and is not parallel to the pocket flap. [This author can envision him cleaning latrines with a toothbrush while doing one-handed pushups for having violated "U.S. Army" protocol, that is, if he ever was in the army. Dunham’s uniform would not have passed inspection!]

In order to understand what one is actually seeing, the head of Stanley Armour Dunham has been 'Photoshopped' onto the image of another person, likely a real soldier. The dark shade of the pocket is part of the soldier's original shirt, and the lighter shade of the shirt (above the pocket) was added in order to accommodate the larger head and neck.

The creator of this collage determined that the discrepancies would be hidden by the intentional darkening of the composite photo.

Unnatural shadowing of the neck was added in order to hide the 'attachment' of Dunham's head to someone else’s torso, and the frill of Stanley Ann's dress conveniently aids in obscuring the darker color of the original
shirt's image next to the pocket.

Photo 2

This photo was created and published in order to legitimize the Dunham clan, Barack Obama's so-called mother and grandparents. The photo's purported location (Beirut, Lebanon) was surmised as a result of the author's investigative research and was not proffered by anyone outside of international intelligence assets. Despite this photo having been 'taken' sometime between 1952-54, it is in remarkably good condition, that is, until its true nature is revealed.

Photo 2: Analysis
In the photo above, the original background has been darkened to aid in masking numerous anomalies which occur in the foreground regarding the three subjects, Stanley Ann, Stanley Armour, and Madelyn Dunham. The shadows cast by each subject's head travel in a different direction (angle), revealing that the photo is actually a composite of at least three photographs. Shadows follow light angles and do not possess the ability to move independently. The contrast level of the original photo was altered to hide the composite nature of the subjects, shadows, etc.

Photo 2-A

Seated (L-R) are Stanley Ann, Stanley Armour, and Madelyn Dunham. This photo has been edited (by the author) in order to reveal lighting anomalies which exist in the original prior to having been masked. The contrast, exposure, and brightness have been restored (somewhat) to reveal its fraudulent nature.

Photo 2-A: Analysis
In the photo above, the shadows end unnaturally and are even nonexistent in places where they should be. For example, why are all three subjects' heads casting shadows at different angles, but their bodies and/or limbs are not casting shadows at all? Notice the shadow to the left of Stanley Ann's head. It stops at the curtain but does not continue onto the wall next to the curtain. Each subject is also looking in a different direction, as if each is totally unaware of the photographer's position, implying that this is a candid shot. Zooming in (enlarging) reveals many anomalies, especially where arms, elbows, and clothing come into proximity to one another. In general, the subjects have been deposited into the photo at different times, Stanley Armour Dunham being the most obvious insertion. Notice the dark lines along the edge of his suit jacket. His image takes on an almost 3-D quality, though the shadow his head casts is much lighter than those cast by Madelyn and Stanley Ann. Notice the shadow on Stanley Ann's right arm, supposedly cast by her belt! And though her dress doesn't cast a shadow, her belt does. Her right shirt sleeve is also the wrong shade -- it should be white. One can now see trees and other objects through the window. Notice the 'entity' (between Stanley Armour's head and Stanley Ann's left shoulder) that appears after the overall contrast has been readjusted.

Reviewing “Photo 2,” one can now discern its fraudulent nature, having seen the additional content in “Photo 2-A” (immediately above).

The next set of photos reveals several anomalies discussed in the aforementioned article. (See: "The Three Stooges go to Washington, Part 4,” The Idaho Observer)

A much older Stanley Armour and Madelyn Dunham are purported to have visited a 21-year-old Barack Obama, Jr. upon "his graduation from Columbia University, New York, NY, in 1983." Obama's dark clothes were chosen to hide the composite imperfections (see below) which would be more apparent had he worn lighter clothing. Both the Dunhams’ and Obama’s clothing is multi-hued, showing effects contradictory to those of natural sunlight, including the absence of (otherwise) natural shadowing.

Photo 3

Barack Obama sits on a bench in Central Park South, New York City with his grandparents, Stanley Armour and Madelyn Dunham.

Photo 3: Analysis
Stanley Armour Dunham was reported to have died on February 8, 1992, so he could not have been in a photo which simultaneously includes Obama's wedding ring, obtained (and worn) on or about October 18, 1992. If this is a genuine photo taken in 1983, Obama would have actually been wearing his wedding ring prematurely—by 9 and 1/2 years.

The most glaring anomaly is the fact that his grandfather appears to be suffering from a severe anatomical distortion: he has 3 arms! Look closely at his left shoulder. His arm is obviously hidden but is clearly hanging at his side. Simultaneously, Stanley Dunham puts his 'third hand' over Barack's shoulder (without raising his arm), but it doesn't quite rest on the shoulder -- it floats in the air!

A closer examination reveals that even the park bench is fraudulent. The photo appears to have been compiled in layers and in the following order: the bench, Stanley Dunham, Barack Obama, Madelyn Dunham, Stanley Dunham's suit jacket—entire left side, and Madelyn Dunham's suit jacket — entire right side.

The background, if in the actual setting of Central Park South, should have water on the other side of the wall nearest the bench—not trees. A closer look reveals two walls, the first near the base of the bench, and the second behind that wall. As in the previous set of photos, the subjects are not looking at the same photographer because there wasn't just one photographer—there were at least three, and most likely, six. The alteration/reinsertion of clothing is most visible along Stanley's left lapel and Madelyn's buttonhole side of her suit jacket, which is, abnormally, a straight line. The buttonholes are aligned, but the right-side lapel is definitely smaller than the left lapel, and so, it is out of proportion.

This photo is a complete composite fabrication intended to perpetuate the lie that Barack Obama attended and graduated from Columbia University and was subsequently visited by his grandparents.

Photo 3-A

Photo 3-A: Analysis
The original photo has been edited (by the author) in order to reveal the darkened aspects of the composite manipulations. Changes were made by altering the white/black-point aspect ratios and by lowering the gamma drive. The actual sunlight patterns of the background become brighter, while the foreground becomes more distinct. The light anomalies of the foreground still remain opposite of what they should be and have little or no affect on Obama's clothing. Because the background is actually lighter, the foreground should be darker. It is not. Therefore, the subjects appear to be together due to composite construction.

With the brightening of this photo, Obama's left trouser leg now appears to be composed of three different types of material, due to the re-cropping of his leg onto the photo, after the insertion of Madelyn Dunham's image. The pant leg near the cuff is a light grey color which mutates into black. Below his left hand, the trousers turn light gray, then coal black. Still not convinced? Then notice that Obama's upper-left leg (femur) appears to be larger (thicker and taller) and longer by 5-6 inches (up to the knee) than his right leg. This is 'Photoshopping' at its worst.

As is seen in most of Barack Obama's photos, his ears protrude closer to his skull, less than can be seen in live television shots. His ears normally protrude outward by an additional 22.5 degrees or so.

There are far too many abnormalities within this photographic rendition for it to be genuine—a “D-” grade in Photoshop 101—and that’s being generous.

Photo 4

In order to promulgate the lie that Barack Obama is related to Kenyans or that he was sired by a Kenyan father, Obama's image was inserted into the following photo which is, again, replete with anomalies, distortions, and fraud.

[The initial analysis of the subject content of this photo appears in the article, "The Three Stooges go to Washington, Part 4," The Idaho Observer.]

Photo 4: Analysis
Enlargement (zooming in) of the above photo again reveals some peculiar anomalies which demonstrate a continuing pattern of obfuscation and fraud. How is it that one is unable to identify certain members of one's own family? The answer to that question is found, first, in considering this photo is an entire composite hoax and never actually occurred at all in realtime.

Barack Obama, Jr. and all other subjects have been compiled into this photo to give the fraudulent representation of a family gathering. Obama's hands appear to be resting on the shoulders of his half-sister, Auma and his grandmother, Kezia. One can see his cupped hands do not look natural—especially his right thumb—and are merely superimposed to look like they are really there. The hand of Abongo (Roy) Obama, his so-called step-brother, rests on Barack's shoulder, while the same hand is holding the hand of an unknown woman. Enlargement reveals that Abongo's right hand has been altered (masked) by photographic editing, showing a large, square pixel in place of the hand.

Again the unknown individual (back row, 2nd from the right) is wearing dark clothes intended to obfuscate the compiled abnormalities which cannot be hidden by other means. The unknown individual (back row, far right) next to him is sporting two-toned trousers, the left leg being powder blue, and the right leg being dark purple. Even the trousers’ inseam on the left leg is purple and is inconsistent with the lack of natural shadows within the entire picture. Nevertheless, that individual's right shoe remains white, while the color of his right pant leg has turned purple.

Photo 4-A

The author has edited an exact digital copy of “Photo 4” in an attempt to determine why shadows appear in such an orderly fashion, especially in places accessible to light

Photo 4-A: Analysis
Consistent with the fraudulent nature of this photograph are the following: Attempts at brightening the shadowed areas underneath and between the two center chairs reveal wheels on one chair, but produce no successful results on the other. This anomaly indicates that the shadow is a solid-black coloration added to facilitate the compiled nature of the photo. Why don't the outermost chairs produce similar shadows where the lighting should be naturally impeded? The floor shadowing effect is actually occurring in the areas between the chairs, where the lighting should reveal a white floor and not a black surface. The floor behind the unknown subject (again, back row, far right) suddenly turns powder blue, matching both the photo's backdrop and the subject's left-trouser leg.

Further analysis of this photo will consistently reveal the same types of anomalies. It should suffice to say that if one subject is fraudulently inserted into the photo, the entire photo is a fraud. This photo also pixellates at different levels of digital magnification, indicating it has been created by a crude method of compilation.

Photo 5

Barack, Sr. joins the photo-fraud party... Photo 5: Analysis
The above photo was discovered after the publication of "The Three Stooges go to Washington, Part 5." This photo is purported to have been taken at "Barack Obama, Sr.'s graduation party" in Hawaii. This photo is also a fraud.

Digital magnification (zooming in) reveals an extremely abnormal set of clues that the photo has been compiled. The majority of subjects are wearing light clothing with short-sleeved shirts or sleeveless dresses, yet the character wearing the abundant number of Hawaiian leis is also wearing a business suit and carrying a portfolio case.

Though the photograph appears to have been taken with a flash bulb, not one of the subjects casts a natural shadow, except for one individual seen squatting in the center of the front row. Actually, the individual wearing the long-sleeved white shirt casts a shadow of his left-hand index finger. That's it.

Magnification reveals that the individual representing Barack Obama, Sr. looks strikingly different from his other photographic representations. His skin tone is suddenly of a lighter complexion, and the left sleeve of his suit jacket is substantially lighter than the rest of his suit—an obvious, unnatural anomaly.

The leis that adorn Obama's neck, shoulders, and chest have been artificially inserted to mask the insertion of his own image. Upon magnification, the leis begin to pixellate immediately, demonstrating that the depth of field in this photograph is virtually nonexistent. This photo is nothing more than another of a collection of compiled photographs.

And despite the fact that this photo implies a sendoff of sorts, Stanley Ann Obama and Barack Obama, Jr. are suspiciously absent. The photo is an obvious attempt at legitimizing cultural diversity, one individual's uncommon popularity, and Obama's presence at the University of Hawaii—another fairy tale.

Photo 5-A

Photo 5-A (above) has been edited (by the author) to demonstrate and reveal the abnormalities which occur in the aforementioned descriptions. Magnification (by zooming) reveals the compiled construction of the photo. The gamma drive has been lowered, which lightens the generally-obscured portions of the compilation.

Photo 5: Analysis
Depicted in this photo are a menagerie of people—several who have, in varying degrees, mastered the art of levitation. Though it is impossible to determine exactly how many of these characters were in the original photo, it is easier to ascertain who was not.

As we will soon see in the 'Punahou School' photos (below), three individuals are squatting in the front row. Close-up magnification reveals that all three are looking in different directions, leaving the impression that they are totally unaware they are about to be photographed.

Upon close inspection, the reader will notice that the ground has front-to-back 'pitch', as if the polished-concrete surface has a slight incline. Note that the trunk sitting in the foreground does not follow the pitch (aspect ratio) of the ground surface. The lock side of the trunk is too high in perspective, creating the illusion that the trunk is levitating in the front. And the trunk exhibits ridiculous light anomalies, such as unnatural shadowing in line of the camera flash.

Looking at the young boy's feet (front-center), his right foot appears to be lifting off the ground. Have you, the reader, ever attempted to squat in this manner while raising the toe end of your foot? You will immediately experience excruciating pain due to the unnatural stretching of muscles, ligaments, and tendons, especially in the area of the shins. Yet, this boy accomplishes the feat with a smile on his face.

The individual sporting the long-sleeved white shirt is also smiling as he accomplishes the same trick with his left foot. His buddy, the one with both hands on the trunk, appears to have recently undergone a dual forearm transplant. One wonders who the donor might have been. It is obvious that the doctor who performed the 'surgery' works for the CIA.

Similar anomalies appear in the front (standing) row, one of the more obvious being the insertion of a sailor who was evidently levitating when the photographer said, "Cheese." The Hawaiian lady to his left (photo right) managed to look in the direction of the photographer, and is actually levitating an inch or so higher than the sailor. Like the others, the pregnant lady standing on the opposite side of the sailor is floating 'above ground',
though the extra weight of the fetus probably keeps her slightly closer to 'terra firma'.

Obama, himself, is totally blocking the person behind him, whose coat or jacket protrudes slightly from behind Obama's artificially-reconstructed left arm. And upon extreme magnification of this image, Obama's suit lacks any hint of the grainy quality of the other subjects' clothing. On the other hand, Obama's face begins to pixellate at the same level of magnification, when the others do not. He has obviously been artificially inserted into this photographic compilation, along with the majority of its participants.

Obama is also holding a portfolio case in his left hand which is an additional prop to aid in obfuscating his left-arm transplant and to plant the idea that he was 'going somewhere' into the mind of the viewer. The presence of a trunk (or travel case) leaves one with a similar impression, although an independent photographer recognizes it as a ‘camera case’. The author is inclined to agree with that assessment, which now begs the question, “How often does a photographer leave his personal effects lying around, in plain sight of his camera lens?

Based on the accounts of Barack Obama, Sr.'s alleged Hawaiian departure sometime in "1963," is it plausible that one of his 'comrades' would be holding up the 'peace' sign? As you may recall, the peace sign evolved in the late-1960s. Its appearance in this photo is an anachronism, and that minute, disingenuous signal, itself, falls short of plausibility. Okay, so it might just be a ‘victory’ sign or someone playing a ‘devil’s-horns’ prank. Since Obama is not actually there, the fingers were probably added to the photo as another meaningless distraction.

Below is the same photo (Photo 5-B) with the gamma drive lowered to zero and the black-point aspects also lowered to zero. A very slight exposure reduction reveals the individual who has been artificially added to the photo. You guessed it—Barack Obama, Sr. He has become a white man in a silver-gray suit. This phenomenon occurs because his image is foreign to the original lighting aspects of the entire photograph. The editing effect darkens the non-white clothes, yet Obama's suit has become light silver in appearance. Notice that the black sailor in the front row is still black. That is because he was added to the photo in a separate layer, prior to the layer in which Obama was added.

Photo 5-B

Photo 6

This photo of the Lolo Soetoro family was published as a representation of Obama's claim to have been adopted by Soetoro. Published as a B&W photo, it is actually a modified color photo. Forensic examination reveals it was modified with Photoshop 3.0.8 and an Apple computer.

(See: "The Three Stooges go to Washington, Part 4," The Idaho Observer, for original publication and preliminary analysis of the following photos within that article.)

The author discovered this anomaly, which has been revealed by him during numerous Internet radio broadcasts since October, 2008. The B&W version of this photo is intended to obfuscate various metaphysical phenomena which appear, along with the typical, compiled representation of separate photographs.

Below is the colorized version of the same photo.

Photo 6-A

Photo 6-A: Analysis
Enlargement of the above photo will reveal many anomalies, foremost being the artificial insertion of the individual subjects that make up the final compilation. Additional anomalies can be clearly seen on the skin, i.e. hands, arms, and knees of the 'human' elements of the photo. Also revealed are lighting abnormalities which surround the heads of all subjects, producing a 'halo' effect on the background wall. Human subjects cast shadows—not light—when photographed.

Shadows and skin tones are either lacking or unnatural, and depth of field is nonexistent. Lighting from the camera's flash is uneven and inconsistent, i.e. one side of the wicker chair casts a shadow, but the other does not. The right side of the wicker chair is also tilted downward (as in the Central Park photo above), and the wood is several shades darker than the left side. Even Barack's left ear casts a shadow which is different in appearance and disproportionate to the shape of that ear and the angle of the camera flash. Notice that Lolo Soetoro's left ear casts a smaller shadow than that of Barack.

And take special notice that Barack's head and left ear are larger than Lolo's. Stanley Ann's head is also larger than Lolo's head by at least 25%, and though she is sitting behind Lolo, her legs, which are slanted slightly to one side, are longer than Lolo's by several inches.

The baby sitting on Stanley Ann's lap, Maya, is also unusually small for a human baby, though her legs extend beyond her mother's knees. In comparison, Barack's left ear is approximately one-half the size of his sister's head. The reason for the disproportionate subjects in this photo can only be explained by the its composite nature.

Photo 6-B

Photo 6-A: Analysis
Further adjustment of the gamma drive, as in “Photo 6-A” reveals that Stanley Ann is wearing a dress with imbedded sequins and a matching Muslim burqa. Both versions of the colorized photo also reveal snake-like skin on all of the subjects. Those features are not caused by pixel distortions and are representative of the original subject content of the photo, another reason for releasing a B&W version of this revealing photographic compilation. The reason for creating such a photo is simple—the purported family is fictional.

Photo 7

Photo 7: Analysis
Obama's presence in the photo above, a Punahou School class photo is, once again, a result of fraudulent manipulation of images inserted into the entire foreground of what originally represented a girl's group photo. The entire row of boys squatting in front of the original photo's subjects is designed to represent a mixed class. In the photo below, every single male has been inserted into the original photograph. The photo not only lacks depth of field, it lacks any semblance of natural shadows. The inserted images are unnatural compilations and could not occur in a realtime photograph. The heads and bodies of the squatters are too large, despite their being in the foreground. The heads of the boys in the front row are also 25-50% larger than those of the girls standing in the back row. Magnification reveals lines around each of the squatting subjects. In order for the front row subjects to reasonably be in the photo, the distance between each row would have to be the width of an Olympic-size swimming pool, just to compensate for the differences in body size. One subject (lower left) is actually cut out of the photo. This collage is yet another multilayered Obama fraud, again, with Obama 'Photoshopped' into the near-center.

The photo below, along with all other Punahou School photos within this treatise, was published within three hours of Dr. Orly Taitz' amended complaint with the U.S. Supreme Court. The photos mysteriously appeared on the huffington.com web site, and the time reference within each photo demonstrates both the times and dates of each photo's release. Dr. Taitz referenced her filing time as "2:30 p.m." These photos have an imbedded time stamp of "5:14:04 p.m." on the day that Dr. Taitz filed her amended complaint. More obfuscation, or just plain damage control???

Photo 8

Photo 8: Analysis
Above is Barack Obama's Punahou School Basketball team photo. The original color photo was changed to B&W before publication. The author, as in the case of the Lolo Soetoro family photo, discerned it was originally a color photo. It was, and it was doctored to hide inferior Photoshop compiling. Again, Obama is conveniently centered in the photo, and he is sitting unusually close to his 'teammates'. Obama is also holding a basketball in his lap, an event unlikely to occur twice in any basketball team photo. His complexion is also unusually dark—darker than his usual photographic skin tone. Enlargement reveals a myriad of artificial compilations inserted, in stages, to make it appear that Obama is really in this photograph. Coincidentally, Obama's crotch area is the only one that casts a shadow.

Notice the right arm of the individual sitting to his left (photo right) and how it is lighter in complexion than his left arm. That anomaly is caused by the actual insertion of Obama's image, followed by the reinsertion of the arm. The same abnormality becomes more apparent in the colorized version of the same photo, which is why it was originally published in B&W format. (See Lolo Soetoro family, “ Photo 6” above.)

Photo 8-A

Photo 8-A: Analysis
This original (restored) colorized version of the B&W photo (above) reveals inconsistent colors on the players' uniforms, especially those sitting in the front row. The author restored the color balance of this photo by using the basketball's color as a reference. The other colors appear as a result of the basketball looking like a basketball. The color differences seen on the uniforms are a result of sloppy photographic compilations, not color restoration.

Obama's 'Afro' begins pixellating before any other subject in the photo, indicating it is a multidimensional compilation derived from multiple sources. It is obvious that Obama's hair is out of proportion, on the left side of his face, and protrudes onto his forehead by several inches more than on the right side. No other photo of Obama exhibits such a hair line as the one seen in this photo. Digital magnification immediately reveals the fraudulent nature of this photo.

Most significant is the coloring of the jersey letters spelling the word, PUNAHOU. The individuals seated on each side of Obama and the one at top row, far right, have jerseys with black lettering. Though all of the letters are sewn onto the jerseys in a semi-circular pattern, the student at the right-center (Obama's left) has lettering that is sewn on in a horizontal line. The letters also have a distinctively different font from the other jerseys, and based upon the appearance of what should be the letter A, the word, PUNAHOU is misspelled.

The script on Obama's jersey is totally masked, both by his arms and by the basketball he is holding against his right leg. Obama's legs are obscured in shadows, though the ball exhibits a unique ability to resist shadowing. Notice that Obama casts shadows underneath his arms, under his chin, and along/between his legs. No other student, except for the one with the anomalous jersey, is casting such shadows, and he casts shadows from a variety of light angles which are not naturally found in the original photo. The light reflected on Obama's basketball reflects light from directly overhead (top), yet the basketball in the front row reflects the same light from the top sides and front angles.

As a final note, the student sitting in the front row, center has a shadow on his left arm which is, in turn, casting a shadow on the right arm of the student sitting to his left (front right). It is impossible for a shadow to cast another shadow upon another object, especially when that object is in front of the shadow. This representation of Barack Obama's basketball team photo is absolutely fraudulent.

Photo 9

Barack Obama, Jr.'s Punahou School graduation photo attempts to convey the
impression, once again, that he did attend the school in Hawaii.

Photo 9: Analysis
Upon enlarging this photo, the image of the females seated and standing in the background seem to be a projection on a large screen. From the focal point where Obama appears to be accepting his diploma, all the other subjects within the photo are bathed in overhead light of a reddish hue, an effect that yellows their gowns and reddens their faces—with one exception, the blonde-haired girl whose face is visible beneath the 'handshake' and above the diploma being handed to Obama. Her hair remains blond, and her gown is snow-white, totally unaffected by the red lights. We are to presume that the camera flash singled her out of the crowd, affecting only her dress and hair, while leaving everyone else, but one cartoon-like character in the vicinity of the diploma, untouched.

Also evident are the fingers visible on Obama's right hand and their distinctively darker color. His claw-like grasp of his ‘diploma’ mirrors the numerous abnormalities and general disfigurement that follows him—from one photo to the next—throughout this entire exposé.

Obama' s tapered, white-collared dress shirt resembles a T-shirt which is not tucked within his trousers—an unexplainable anomaly which suggests the shirt, necktie, and sport coat are Photoshopped into the image. It is strange that the lighting that casts an orange-red hue on his 'Afro' hairdo has no impact upon his white shirt, his sport coat, his tie, his trousers, nor his hand which is held upward, facing the very light which has given his coal-black hair a reddish hue. Equally, the man presenting the diploma is not at all affected by the same reddish light on any part of his head, body, or clothing. His hands also exhibit different skin tones, despite both hands being exposed to the same light of the camera flash. And the white object behind this individual seems totally unaffected by the same reddish light bathing the rest of the audience.

This photo is not only full of inexplicable inconsistencies, it is an abomination. (No pun intended!) It is no surprise that the background subjects paid little or no attention at all to Obama, largely because he was not even there. Generally speaking, such photographs are taken from the perspective of the whole audience, not from backstage. And this photo, like Obama's other school photos, is cropped at the edges, omitting any possible details that might give away its fraudulent nature. Ponder that for a moment, and you, too, will see the ruse.

Conclusions
By now, the reader will be asking more than a few questions. Why would anyone fake such important photographs, and how could they expect to get away with such a criminal act after all? The answers to those questions (and the others you may be asking yourself) are simple:

Obama and his New-World-Order handlers had no other choice. Barack Hussein Muhammed Obama, Jr. is, and has been, a fraud—from day one. That is what he is, and that is all he will ever be.

The powers-that-be, in their arrogant, psychopathic zeal, assume that a sufficient number of people have been adequately brainwashed to the extent that they will 'believe' anything. Many have believed the lies from the very beginning and likely still do. But the NWO types and their minions have severely miscalculated the sheer determination and conviction which drives those who relentlessly cast light on their dark deeds and on their evil plans for humanity.

The first step in accepting Barack Obama's promise for "change” is taken after accepting his fraudulent historical accounts, his fraudulent 'documentation', and now—his fraudulent Photoshop images. If you, the reader, can honestly look at any photographs of Barack Obama or his self-proclaimed international-bloodline stooges without a hint of suspicion regarding those photos’ origins, you have already experienced the "change" for which you have longed. You will have been blinded by the very darkness that follows him and those whose bidding he does.

The 'messiah' you have awaited has symbolically twisted the words which describe the True Messiah's "Immaculate Conception," into his own "immaculate deception." Satan, himself, would be proud of such a feat.

In summation, there remains no doubt, now, that the photographic biography of Barack Hussein Muhammed Obama, Jr. is as great a fiction as his own autobiographical accounts, whether in book, audio, video, online, or print-media format. Although these photos do not conclusively prove where Obama or his family were at any given point in time, they do prove where he—and they—were not.

© 2009 by Don Nicoloff / Direct Light Productions

directlightproductions.com

The Three Stooges go to Washington, Part 5 Barack Obama: New Revelations, Same Ol' Dirt

Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:58:11 -0500

By Don Nicoloff
December 18, 2008

Despite the mainstream media's successful campaign to rewrite the biblical books, "Genesis" and "Revelation," President-elect Barack Hussein Muhammed Obama, Jr. has yet to produce a valid Certificate of Live Birth proving he was born in the U.S., a constitutional requirement to run for the nation's highest office.

Obama's ineligibility, based upon undocumented proof of U.S. citizenship, plus his admitted associations with convicted money launderers, drug users/dealers and political terrorists, and his general incapacity to tell the truth about anything remain unreported by the mainstream media. Either the ensuing dust storm has settled, or it has been sucked into a vortex of "new" revelations. The latter conclusion is likely true.

What you are about to read will certainly shatter the myths surrounding the fictitious character now thought to be America's "Messiah."

Independent research reveals a "birth in Kenya"
Since my publication of "The Three Stooges go to Washington, Parts 1-4" series (The Idaho Observer, April-Sept., 2008), Dr. Jerome Corsi, author of Obama Nation, and Philadelphia attorney Philip J. Berg have revealed new information regarding multiple "Certificates of Live Birth" found in Kenya, Indonesia, and even Vancouver, B.C. However, Obama has still failed to produce a valid certificate from any country, let alone Hawaii.

In October, 2008, Dr. Corsi was detained by Kenyan authorities prior to revealing the news of "Obama's birth in Mombasa, Kenya" in a scheduled press conference. Corsi was warned to "never return to Kenya." Disclosure by this author that Obama had financially supported Raila Odinga's oppressive rise to power is further substantiated by Corsi's detainment experience.

Supporting Dr. Corsi's findings, Berg had filed a lawsuit demanding that Obama produce valid birth documentation, based upon his discovery of a Kenyan Certificate of Live Birth — prior to Corsi's trip to Kenya.

Berg also claims he has an audio recording of Obama's African grandmother, Sarah, who said she also witnessed the Kenyan birth event. The tape was recorded by Bishop Ron McRae, who interviewed Sarah through two interpreters; a grandson and Reverend Kweli Shuhubia. According to Sarah, Stanley Ann Dunham gave birth to Barack Obama, Jr. in Mombasa, Kenya. The October 16, 2008 audio recording is supported by a written transcript on Berg's "http://obamacrimes.com" web site. Thousands of interested parties (including the author) have heard the recording which substantiates Berg's claim.

It is pertinent, though, that Kezia, Obama, Sr.'s first wife (of 3-4 wives in his polygamous marriages), describes a completely different scenario. Kezia's statements in her Mail Online interview now come under further scrutiny, having previously "met Stanley Anne (Dunham) Obama-Soetoro many years later while in London, England." In that same interview, Kezia stated that Barack Obama, Jr.'s first visit to Africa occurred in 1985, in direct conflict with Obama's own autobiographical account. Obama claimed his first visit occurred after the death of his half-brother (who he claims he never met), David Obama in 1987. These new revelations, if true, place Obama's first visit to Kenya on August 4, 1961, the day he was born.

Still, one must discern if the whole event could have been staged by the Republican party, as a last-ditch effort to salvage John Sidney McCain's flailing campaign. Berg is a self-admitted Democrat with dubious ties to the Clintons, which casts a different light on his lawsuit. On all accounts, Berg has publicly stated, both on his web site blog and in YouTube videos, that he is doing this "on behalf of all Americans." If true, that is the honorable thing to do.

Berg's lawsuit dismissed on "constitutional" grounds
Philip Berg's lawsuit against Obama and the Democratic National Committee had recently been dismissed by Judge R. Barclay Surrick, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, on the grounds that there exists no constitutional provision requiring Obama to prove (to Berg or any other American) that he is a U.S. citizen. In short, Berg "has no constitutional standing." The judge's ruling disappointed Berg, who announced he would take his appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, bypassing the State Appellate Court in Pennsylvania, due to the rapidly approaching election on November 4, 2008.

There are further allegations that Obama visited Kenya in 1980, 1981, and 1983. An online documentary revealed that Obama, then aged 19, traveled to Kenya (from Indonesia) in 1980. The documentary claimed that Obama changed his Indonesian citizenship to "Kenyan" at that time. Suspiciously, the one-hour video was removed from the Internet in less than 24 hours. It had also focused attention on Obama's numerous Muslim ties, both inside and outside of the U.S., including author and self-admitted communist Frank Marshall Davis, controversial Columbia University Professor Rashid Khalidi, William Ayres (Weather Underground terrorist group), and Syrian-born Chicago real estate developer, Antoin "Tony" Rezko, who was recently convicted on 16 counts of fraud.

Producing one's Certificate of Live Birth should be an ordinary task for even the most intellectually-challenged mind. The requirement to produce such a document usually accompanies a visa application, a driver's license examination, or even an employment application. Barack Obama ran for the highest office in the land. Why hasn't a valid CoLB not been demanded of him, his campaign committee, the Democratic National Committee, or the Federal Elections Commission?

McCain, Bush set illegal precedent
The answer can be found in the case of Senator John McCain, III, as well as that of former President George H.W. Bush. McCain could not have been "born in Coco Solo Naval Base hospital, Panama Canal Zone," since that hospital did not exist until some seven years after his birth on "August 29, 1936." Franklin D. Roosevelt's Executive Order 8981, December 17, 1941, instructed engineers to acquire the property (through lease or purchase) and "begin laying the initial boundaries for the property, before the hospital's construction."

McCain's claim to have been born to a "long line of Americans" is disputed by my research into the merchant marine backgrounds of his "grandfather," John McCann (aka "John Sydney McCain, Sr.") and his "father," Albert McCann (aka "John Sydney McCain, Jr."). There is sufficient evidence that these two McCanns (who were, instead, more likely to have been brothers) were sired courtesy of Prince Albert Edward of Scotland, who later sat on the British throne as Edward VII.

Senator John Sydney McCain, III was likely a direct product of that royal lineage, supported by numerous accounts of illicit affairs, namely with one Jenny Jerome, who subsequently became Lady Randolph Churchill, mother of Winston Churchill. McCain's father was probably King George V, the younger brother of John McCann. This conclusion has yet to be disputed.

Entering the U.S. illegally circa 1938, the teenage son of Nikola Tesla's assistant/accountant George H. Scherff, Sr. (an illegal immigrant), forged a birth certificate which enabled him to enlist into the U.S. Navy as a citizen of the United States. Former Nazi SS assassin Otto Skorzeny outed George H. Scherff, Jr. (aka George H.W. Bush) in his deathbed confession, shortly before dying on December 31, 1999 at Boynton Beach, FL. The coverup of the Scherffs' identities was masterminded by Adolf Hitler and later aided by former FBI director, J. Edgar Hoover.

Skorzeny also admitted his and Reinhard Gehlen's participation in the murder of scientist/inventor Nikola Tesla on January 6, 1943. Hoover's coverup was intended to protect the Scherffs (aka Bushes) and obfuscate Tesla's murder. The OSS and the FBI were recipients of Tesla's stolen research papers, laboratory notes, patents, and inventions. Anyone doubting the veracity of this story can research Skorzeny's alias, "Edward Frank Pyzyna."

As previously reported (see "Deatbed Confessions, Photos Support Claims that George H. Scherf(f), Jr. was the 41st U.S. President," The Idaho Observer), U.S. Navy airman George H.W. Bush became a war hero after ejecting from his plane, sending his navigator and gunner to their premature deaths when their pilotless plane crashed into the Pacific Ocean. Bush (Scherff, Jr.) was rescued from a rubber raft by an awaiting German submarine which towed the plane to a German cargo ship. He became a "war hero" for his efforts.

Another lawsuit filed
After a second lawsuit filed in Hawaii by journalist Andy Martin, officials declared that Obama's files "were sealed." Why? What secrets are the governor, secretary of health, and the attorney general of Hawaii hiding? Obama has produced a fake certificate (deemed "a horrible forgery" by forensic analysts), so Hawaiian officials could not be hiding that. The "sealing" declaration sounds like yet another Obama ruse intended to dissuade further investigation.

As if the pressure of so much scrutiny became too much for her to bear, Obama's grandmother, Madelyn Lee (Payne) Dunham became publicly "ill." "Obama delayed his flight to Honolulu because of my investigative team's presence there," Martin alluded. Martin also stressed (to this author) that "I don't want to hear what you have to say about Obama's citizenship or other investigative research. I don't want people to accuse me of conspiring with someone else or of having ulterior motives." Evidently, investigating the conspirators becomes, itself, a conspiracy.

This author responded to Martin's comment by asking, "Even if the information leads one to the truth?" Martin remained steadfastly determined not to hear what my research had uncovered, though he was polite in doing so. In retrospect, Madelyn Dunham's "sudden" illness seemed suspicious, as if she were the cause of Obama's sudden trip to Hawaii. The story appeared to be meant for public consumption. Is it mere coincidence that Obama's records were "sealed" at the same time? Reminiscent of CIA tales, Madelyn Dunham suddenly "died of cancer," on November 3, 2008 — the day before the presidential election.

Links to self-professed communists
Dr. Jerome Corsi has also hypothesized that Frank Marshall Davis is likely the real father of Barack Obama, Jr. — not Barack Obama, Sr.. Davis, a self-described "swinger," in his book, “Sex Rebel,” described a 3-day bisexual fling with a couple from Seattle, "Dot and Lloyd." It was surmised (by Corsi) that this couple might actually have been Stanley Armour and Madelyn Lee (Payne) Dunham, Obama's purported "grandparents."

We know the Dunhams had some kind of relationship with Davis, but was it one of a sexual nature? Possibly, though it likely had more to do with Madelyn's vice-presidential post with the Bank of Hawaii. Madelyn was "one of two female VPs" at the bank.

Could "Dot" have been the other female V.P. at the Bank of Hawaii — Dorothy Yamamoto? This author conducted a search, and to his surprise, located a "Lloyd and Dorothy Yamamoto" from Michigan, then Cleveland, Ohio, where Lloyed graduated from South High School in 1936, before moving to Honolulu, HI. Lloyd was also a chemist (as was another CIA associate of Stanley Armour Dunham in Oklahoma City), which implies that the Yamamotos also worked for the CIA. Lloyd's father, Charles, was a genetic scientist. Sound familiar?

It has yet to be determined if the Yamamotos actually lived in Seattle, though one can deduce, by association, that they likely did. The Dunhams' associations with Boeing in Kansas and Seattle, and Madelyn's vice-presidential role with a "mystery bank" after their "move to Seattle" were preparatory assignments for their roles in Hawaii. It is logical that Dorothy Yamamoto would have received her training along with Madelyn Dunham. So, the odds of "Dot and Lloyd" having been anyone other than associates of the Dunhams are staggering.

Barack Obama's own disclosures in his "Dreams from My Father" autobiography described drug and alcohol use with Davis, his grandfather, Stanley Armour Dunham, and various unsavory characters who played cards and shared in the aforementioned vices.

Stanley Ann, it has recently been revealed, posed nude for Davis in pornographic photos now circulating the Internet. What is not clear is exactly when those photos were taken. The author has seen three of those photos and considers them too distasteful to include within this research.

Another set of photos, taken in July, 1961 at Waikiki beach during the third trimester of her pregnancy, reveals a not-so-pregnant Stanley Ann Dunham. The photos of a 17-year-old girl in a bathing suit tell a completely different story than the one described in Obama's autobiography. Was Barack, Sr. aware of her modeling endeavors? These revelations paint an entirely different picture of the whole "family," not to mention the ruse of Barack's "Hawaiian birth." No wonder the records have been ordered "sealed."

Obama's "Certificate of Live Birth" contains many anomalies — and one major faux-pas
The document posted on Barack Obama's "Campaign 2008" web site was deemed a fraud and "a horrible forgery" by forensic researchers. Despite its lack of proper signatures, seals, numbers, and other important features, the "Certificate of Live Birth" in question reveals a grave, glaring error. Surprisingly, no one has yet to address this issue until now.

The racial nomenclature of the 1960s did not refer to one's race by denoting skin color. Whites were called "Caucasians," blacks were called "Negroes," orientals were called "Asians," and latinos were called "Hispanics." Blacks born in American were never referred to as "African" by race, yet in the space denoting Barack Obama, Sr.'s race (on Obama, Jr.'s "Certificate of Live Birth"), it clearly reads "Race: African." This single anachronism is akin to a "wristwatch in a Shakespeare play." It is fraudulent and intended to imply that Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. is an "African-American." The voting public has bought this lie. And so have the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court. This single fact is proof that Obama's CofLB is a modern-day forgery — a felony.

Dorothy can still lay claim to Kansas: Stanley Ann Dunham's early education
In "The Wizard of Oz," Dorothy Gale's story begins on a farm in Kansas. After being struck by a window which became unhinged during a tornado, Dorothy finds herself in a strange land -- a mixture of both good and evil. By the end of this epic tale, she discovered "the Wizard" of all illusions, as she chanted, "There's no place like home.... there's no place like home." Dorothy's story sounds suspiciously similar to that of Barack Hussein Muhammed Obama.

As revealed in "The Three Stooges go to Washington, Part 3 and Part 4," (The Idaho Observer), there existed virtually no information about the "Dunham" clan and their whereabouts during most of Stanley Ann Dunham's childhood — until now. Recently, the author discovered the existence of an earlier school education in the state of Oklahoma. Recall that Rolla Payne, the father of Madelyn Lee (Payne) Dunham, had worked for John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil Company and managed leases/drilling operations in Oklahoma and internationally. This fact was discovered by tracing Payne's social security number, which had been issued in Oklahoma, not in Kansas.

Why would the Dunhams' presence in Oklahoma have been cause for concern? Why had no one, including Obama, Jr., informed the public of such a fact? There were plenty of opportunities for him to do so in his autobiography (the one now alleged to have been written by author William Ayers of Weather Underground fame). Disclosure of the Dunhams' Oklahoma City background would have obliterated the myth of their "Kansas roots." That feat will be accomplished within the following research.

Stanley Ann Dunham received her kindergarten education at a private school known as "Kindernook," in Warr Acres, OK. Kindernook was run and taught by a "Mrs. Estes," who was related to the founders of Estes Park, Colorado. Stanley Ann attended the school from 1949-51, beginning about three months before her seventh birthday. Was she the "model student" she was purported to be at Mercer Island High School? According to one of her kindergarten and first-grade classmates — "no." This same classmate professed his "love for Stanley Ann" to both parents and to this author. What was his motive for sharing this information? He realised that Stanley Ann Dunham's Oklahoma schooling was a critical, but missing piece of the puzzle pertaining to the Dunhams' post-WWII whereabouts.

Stanley Ann Dunham, age 8

Pictured above is Putnam City, Oklahoma Elementary School's first grade class during the 1950-51 school year. Though one cannot predict how children will act while having their picture taken, it seems a bit odd that only 10 out of 33 students (less than one-third) were able to muster a smile. Stanley Ann Dunham, age 8, is standing in the back row, the 4th student from the right.

Stanley Ann was determined to become the "teacher's pet" and frequently got into trouble. Occasionally, she was brought to the front of the classroom to be disciplined in the presence of the other students. During a reading of "Bambi," Stanley Ann insisted on seeing the flames that caused Bambi to flee her forest home. "Stanley Ann had a peculiar, insatiable desire to see the fire — and the flames," her former classmate intimated. "She got up from her desk and approached Mrs. Estes, demanding to see the book's illustrations. Mrs. Estes firmly instructed Stanley Ann to sit down, but she refused, still insisting to see the fire. She was made to sit by herself in the corner of the classroom. Looking back, Kindernook was a mind-control school for children."

The classmate continued, "Stanley Ann Dunham also attended first grade, beginning in the summer of 1950, at Putnam City Elementary School, located in a suburb of Oklahoma City. I never saw her again, after she completed the first grade in 1951."

Not much more is known about Stanley Ann's subsequent education until she reappeared a few years later at Notre Dame de Jamhour, a Jesuit school in Lebanon. This author determined the scene of that photo session through his own independent investigation. (See "The Three Stooges go to Washington, Part 3," The Idaho Observer).

Stanley Ann Dunham's associate arrested for "terrorist bomb threat"
Another twist in the web of "associates" known to micro-loan/Internet real estate magnate and CIA "spook" (not really deceased) Stanley Ann Dunham (aka "Kelly L. Schippleck," "Kelly L. Allen," "Kelly A. Dunham," etc., etc.), Chet H. Woolley, 36, was arrested by the South Kohala Police Department on October 22, 2002. Woolley, now age "42," had made a bomb threat to a restaurant employee at the Mauna Lani Bay resort. No further information, other than the "media release" (below), was made available.

HAWAII COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT SOUTH KOHALA DISTRICT CAPTAIN ROBERT KAAUA PHONE: 887-3080 OCTOBER 23, 2002
MEDIA RELEASE
On Tuesday, October 22, 2002, at about 7:35 p.m., South Kohala Patrol officers responded to the Mauna Lani Bay resort to investigate a reported bomb threat.
Officers confirmed that a suspect identified as Chet H. Woolley (M-36) of a Puako address had entered a restaurant at the hotel and informed an employee that he had a bomb. After leaving the restaurant, he left a small duffel bag in the lobby and ran from the hotel towards the main road. He was apprehended by the employee and hotel security personnel.
Upon arrival of police officers, it was learned that a hotel employee had removed the duffel bag from the lobby to a safe location away from the hotel.
The U.S. Army Explosive Ordinance Disposal Unit determined that no explosive device was located within the bag.
Woolley was arrested on two counts of Terroristic Threatening and held at the Kona police station cellblock. The investigation is being continued by the Kona Criminal Investigations Section.

Stanley Ann Dunham's "Kelly L. Schippleck" alias was first reported in "The Three Stooges go to Washington, Part 3," The Idaho Observer, along with an abbreviated list of other aliases. The above-referenced "Chet Hilburn Woolley" was recently added to her former "Possible Associates" listing as a "Possible Roommates / Associates" entry.
As the author's research continued, he discovered a systematic pattern of identity theft and money-laundering through real estate transactions across the U.S. Have we been told the real truth behind the "$850 billion Bailout?" No. Actually, that amount has secretly risen to $8.5 trillion, though we still hear nothing remotely related to the truth about the banking/brokerage/insurance-holdings/mortgage/real estate company fraud which, by the way, is being blamed on "irresponsible homeowners who are delinquent on their home mortgages." Simply put, the explanation for these massive financial failures centers around "the hypothecation of collateralized public assets" which have been pooled (illegally) into pure trusts (as derivatives and hedge funds), then deposited into (now frozen) offshore accounts. Two such vehicles are called "Asset-backed Securities Trust Pool(s), 2006-HES" and "Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-HES."
Below is an basic example of how these assets are documented and tracked online. The reader should note that the names "Schippleck" and "Allen" are aliases for Stanley Ann Dunham. Her "roommate," Chet Hilburn Woolley is likely an intelligence agent involved in the scam. Hundreds of links can be tied to the four examples below, though the total number of such entries is in the millions. The "total value" of the scam likely approaches $667 trillion.

People Search: SCHIPPLECK, KELLY  in  HI

   Subject: SCHIPPLECK, KELLY L, Age: 40
   1 unique address in Rocklin, CA
   6 unique addresses in Honolulu, HI
   1 unique address in Canton, MA
   1 unique address in Valhalla, NY

   Subject: WOOLLEY, CHET HILBURN, Age: 42
   2 unique addresses in Panama City, FL
   5 unique addresses in Honolulu, HI
   2 unique addresses in Kailua Kona, HI
   2 unique addresses in Londonderry, NH
   1 unique address in Cliffside Park, NJ
   1 unique address in Newport, RI
   1 unique address in Corpus Christi, TX
   1 unique address in Waitsfield, VT

   Subject: ALLEN, CHRISTINE, Age: 41
   1 unique address in Ponte Vedra, FL
   1 unique address in Ponte Vedra Beach, FL
   1 unique address in Valhalla, NY
   2 unique addresses in Aurora, OH
   2 unique addresses in Northfield, OH
   1 unique address in Homestead, PA
   1 unique address in Munhall, PA
   2 unique addresses in Pittsburgh, PA

   Subject: ALLEN, GRANDISON GREER, Age: 68
   1 unique address in Glendale, AZ
   1 unique address in Mesa, AZ
   1 unique address in Phoenix, AZ
   3 unique addresses in Tempe, AZ
   1 unique address in Kissimmee, FL
   7 unique addresses in Honolulu, HI
   1 unique address in Canton, MA
   1 unique address in Adelphi, MD
   1 unique address in Hyattsville, MD
   4 unique addresses in North Beach, MD

Stanley Armour Dunham's alter-ego: "Mr. Al"
Stanley Armour and Madelyn Dunham had friends in Oklahoma City -- well outside of Kansas. In fact, the Dunhams had first met their Oklahoma City friends while living in Chicago. Stanley was introduced to my informant as "Mr. Al" , and the Dunhams frequented Oklahoma City restaurants with his parents. "Mr. Al was from Chicago and Lebanon." That comment would explain the "4 addresses in Chicago" I had discovered while tracking real estate aliases for Madelyn L. Dunham. Madelyn never had anything to do with Chicago before that minute detail was discovered. The reference to "Lebanon" is further substantiated by a photo in "The Three Stooges go to Washington, Part 3, " (The Idaho Observer) depicting Stanley Ann donning her NDJ school uniform during a visit by Stanley Armour and Madelyn Dunham.

What was it that could be so damning to the Dunhams that their days spent in Oklahoma City should remain a secret? According to my source, his father and Stanley Armour Dunham "both worked for the CIA." The author independently arrived at the same conclusion, but this revelation, coupled with yet another Tinker AFB connection, set the research in stone. World War II was run out of Tinker AFB, Oklahoma, where Stanley Armour Dunham became a frequent visitor, despite his career as a "furniture salesman."

Pictured (L-R): The unidentified wife (or companion) of Dr. George King, Stanley Armour Dunham, Mrs. Grace Raschke, Dr. George King, Madelyn Lee (Payne) Dunham, and Wilson & Co./Safeway Foods chemist, Dr. Charles Raschke. This photo, taken sometime between 1946-1948 clearly depicts the Dunhams at a restaurant in Oklahoma City, OK. Stranger still is the unusually casual "intimacy" between at least two of these three couples. The Raschkes first met the Dunhams in Chicago, prior to moving to Oklahoma City. King (center) was "unidentified" in this photo, until the author was directed to listen to a recording describing his "teachings." As is the case with the Dunhams, King's appearance in this photograph disputes any "official" claim to have first arrived in the U.S. in November, 1960 — the same month Stanley Ann Dunham allegedly conceived "Barack Hussein Muhammed Obama, Jr." (The discovery of King's identity is described in detail under the next subtopic heading below.)

And the previously disclosed "Wesley A. Dunham" (also with a wife named "Madelyn") in Oklahoma City, now makes more sense. Madelyn (in Oklahoma City) insisted the "A" in Wesley's middle name stood for "Arnel," though such a record does not exist, except in a single cemetery database entry. Records do show the "A" stands for "Alan," and these new revelations support that conclusion. Both of these "Dunhams" (or the same ones) also worked at Tinker AFB, Madelyn for 37 years, while supporting her "disabled" husband after his having worked there for only a few years. (See "The Three Stooges go to Washington, Part 3," The Idaho Observer.)

What special privileges were accorded the Dunhams, that they should become agents for the international intelligence community? That question would be answered on an Internet blog site, Israel Insider, published by Reuven Koret in Tel Aviv, Israel, which featured a private e-mail communique from a national security lawyer with credible intelligence agency contacts. Having received a death threat regarding the posting of this "insider" information, Koret soon removed the detailed account of Barack Obama, Jr.'s origins, the unexpected death of his "father," the backgrounds of his "surrogate" mother and grandparents, and their CIA/Abwehr associations, citing his concern for his personal safety as the main reason for its removal.

Most astounding to this author, and likely the reader, is the fact that this unsolicited e-mail account details (almost verbatim) the conclusions drawn through independent, painstaking research. In light of the new information presented herein, this excerpted second article, which features the mystery e-mail's disclosures, corroborates the most salient, obfuscated facts. This author does not agree with the hypothesis that Obama is — or ever was — related to Malcom X. Though plausible on the surface, the theory only serves to further obscure the truth.

Is Obama the secret son of Malcom X?

by Reuven Koret, Israel Insider Publisher

In August I received a curious email. As a magazine that covers international politics, with a focus on Mideast affairs, Israel Insider gets more from its fair share of baseless tips and phony rumors. I ignore most and delete them unread. This one was a bit different. It came from a national security lawyer with extensive credentials and intelligence connections that checked out, and a phone number.
 Israel Insider had been running a series of articles exploring the vagaries of Barack Obama's birth, and his concealed documentation, and this was the jumping off point of the email, which confirmed the claim that Obama was not born in Hawaii, that "Mossad are going with Mombasa" but "Proving Mombasa is not so easy, as NSIS in Nairobi are clamming up tight, as are MI6 in London, who have the original Mombasa file and full details of the birth."  He said that "Disproving Honolulu is child's play. You've already shown that the birth certificate put forward by Obama (whose people privately are not denying Mombasa, by the way) is a fake. Why fake it? If he was born in Honolulu he could obtain a genuine one. Hawaii Dept of Health would hardly denounce a potential presidential candidate's birth certificate as fraudulent without cross-checking birth records for August 1961. No birth was registered in the name of Obama in Honolulu in August 1961."  (This last detail may explain why Hawaiian officials last Friday confirmed that a birth certificate does indeed exist but conspicuously refused to release any details or even confirm that the details conform to those on the computer-generated Certification of Live Birth. The name on the "original" certificate may in fact not be Obama nor the birthplace Honolulu. But Obama's recent visit "to his grandmother" may well have had less to do with her health than eliciting this vague and inconclusive statement from the Hawaiian Health Department.)  The source continues: "There is no evidence Ann Dunham had even met Obama Senior in or around November 1960, the alleged time of conception, indeed it is not even clear Obama was in Honolulu at that time, although he may have been. Ann Dunham was only 17 and although she might have been in Honolulu the timing is tight." "More to the point, she was in neither of the medical centers put forward by the Obama campaign (question: why do they not know in which hospital he was born?) on August 4th, nor are there medical records to back up the claimed birth, nor has an attending physician been named. I've heard of births with the father absent, births with the mother absent a bit trickier."   "There are said to be photos of Ann Dunham on Waikiki Beach taken in or about July 1961, when she is supposed to have been in her third trimester, in a bikini, taken by a fellow female student. AD is clearly not pregnant. Media have not yet talked to fellow students, but it can't be long. There are bound to be other photos of AD in existence taken during the alleged 2nd and 3rd trimesters. Obama campaign are terrified someone will press for her medical records, which have been accessed by CIA."  "Moving to Indonesia the Obama campaign are also suppressing the Indonesian immigration and passport records, which I believe show him as a Kenyan citizen, and the naturalisation records. They have not denied Internet claims he was naturalised in Indonesia. If he was a US citizen there should be a visa record to back that up."  "Obama Senior was murdered in Kenya in 1982 to silence him. Interesting story re his sister Auma as well -- she appears to be a full sister, not a half-sister as he is claiming, i.e. they share the same mother. She was ordered back to Kenya in 2007 to prevent DNA testing .... CIA did a DNA test on the grandparents, using saliva from glasses, which conclusively rules out any relationship between Obama and the Dunhams."  "The source said that the Dunham family became involved because Stanley Dunham, Sr. was suspected of espionage. Boeing, he said, has "a 1944 security file on Stanley Dunham in connection with suspected sabotage of B-17G aircraft at their Wichita Kansas plant and the theft of B-29 blueprints, a full set of which were passed to the German Abwehr via Lisbon by June 1944. Ann Dunham appears to have been chosen as the surrogate mother in 1963 because of the family connection to German Intelligence. German assets in the US, including Rezko, who is connected to the Syrian Mukhabarat and the German DVD, sponsored his career.  "Effectively," the source concludes, "Obama is a German sleeper agent." .....

[This author did question the plausibility of Stanley Ann Dunham being nothing more than a "surrogate" mother, and as my investigative research progressed, it became clear that her own "parents" were likely surrogates as well. By having all three Dunhams turned into "spooks" ("deceased" operatives working undercover) before the 2008 election , the CIA-controlled assets, media, politicians, and corporate interests will prevent public acknowledgment of actual DNA test results. As mentioned in "The Three Stooges go to Washington, Parts 3 and 4, (The Idaho Observer), not only was the "Kansas" story a modern-day version of "The Wizard of Oz," every aspect of the Dunhams' existence is replete with duplicitous, unprovable, or purely fraudulent information — including the "official" documents presented for public consumption. The mainstream media, which used to pounce upon such inconsistencies with impunity, has conveniently become deaf, dumb, and blind to these truths. Their attitude, behavior, and general nonchalance significantly demonstrates just who their controllers really are.]

Dr. George King: Founder of The Aetherius Society
"Blessed is the Great Being known as the Galaxy" is the home-page pronouncement at http://aetherius.org, the official web site of The Aetherius Society. The society's founder, Dr. George King was "born in Shropshire, England on January 23, 1919." King's flowery (but dubious) biography describes a young man raised in a traditionally orthodox Christian environment, though he turned to psychic phenomena to obtain a deeper understanding of causes.

By the time he had reached his early thirties, "King had studied yoga for 10 years, spending from 8-12 hours per day mastering Raja (mental), Gnani (wisdom), and Kundalini yoga." There is no mention of King having studied Hatha (physical) yoga, the most fundamental and precursory of all the yogic disciplines. Instead, via the potentially dangerous fast track to "enlightenment," King professed to have reached "Samadhi," the most elevated state of consciousness one can obtain while residing within the human vehicle. Not only is the above scenario impractical, it is highly unlikely, even bordering on nonsensical.

The "official" description of Dr. King's designation as "Primary Terrestrial Mental Channel," by "the Cosmic Masters of the Solar System," smacks of a Tavistock Institute mind-control project. Proclamations of "Cosmic Teachings and Spiritual Missions" foundational to the "New Age" are tools of the Illuminati, further revealing the true nature of King's mission in America.

Based upon King's previously unknown association with the Dunhams, who, themselves, are reported to have lived in California, it becomes clear that a young Barack Obama may have come under King's tutelage or influence, likely during the period Obama claims to have "attended Occidental College." To this date, Obama has failed to produce any legitimate proof of his attendance at any school. King may have been Obama's "designated handler."

King received several awards for his charitable works for humanity, including The Prize of Peace and Justice (International Union of Christian Chivalry). Prior recipients of this award included "Albert Einstein, Mother Teresa, and Albert Schweitzer."

Another notable award King received was "A Grant of Arms" by Her Majesty's College of Arms, London, England. Convincing the Earl Marshall and paying the appropriate fee are the two major criteria for achieving this feat, though it appears to be a privilege usually reserved for those of hereditary distinction in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland.

Dr. George King was also the "Chaplain of the American Federation of Police." Actually, the award mentioned on King's web site omitted the second half of the charity's name — "and Concerned Citizens." Of all police charities, the American Federation of Police and Concerned Citizens has the worst rating, consistently ranking last in every category. Out of a potential "four-star" rating, the organization routinely gets a "one," the lowest rating. The group's efficiency rating is roughly 35%, meaning they spend 65% of the funds they raise for "charitable" causes on their members, not on the causes. Of course, there is no mention of a "chaplain's salary."

Dr. King's "awards" raise a few more questions. Why is it that he received an award for "peace and justice?" Where or when has anyone experienced the results of his efforts in these areas? America has literally been at war somewhere on the planet since the days of the Founding Fathers. Is the state of our current U.S. Justice Department and the rule of law an indication of Dr. King's benevolent mission? To be succinct, the author had never heard of Dr. George King receiving these accolades, nor for any other accomplishment.

King has earned another accolade, bestowed by this author, though the members of his cult might disagree. "The Master," as he is still affectionately called by his followers, appears to have been a double agent who worked for both the naval section of Britain's MI6 foreign intelligence (espionage) division and the American CIA. Those two positions put him on par with Stanley Armour Dunham, who worked for U.S. Army intelligence (Ft. Leavenworth) and the CIA. I reached this conclusion about the entire Dunham clan before having seen the photograph (above) or ever having heard about the existence of Dr. Charles Raschke and Dr. George King. The photo merely confirmed my earlier suspicions while revealing previously undisclosed facts about the Dunhams' true whereabouts after WWII.

It is quite unjust, and even anticlimactic, that Dr. King, having spent from 29,200 - 43,800 hours over a 10-year period studying and promoting yoga, never received one award for such devotion — not even an honorable mention. Despite the arduous task of learning and practicing yoga for such a long time, King had not even mastered a "full lotus," the most common physical posture employed during meditation.

Dr. George King Dr. George King, “Yoga Master”
and “Master of the Leaning Half-Lotus”


Madelyn Dunham's rise to banking fame
Madelyn L. Dunham was the second of two women promoted to VP of the Bank of Hawaii. At her farewell sendoff, she was described as "honest, a hard worker, and not a racist. She never used foul language." This appraisal was made, at her retirement party, by a male bank employee who eventually went on to head his own escrow and title company after having been hired by Mrs. Dunham. These comments fly in the face of those made by her "grandson."

Dunham was also the chief escrow officer at the bank. Her position afforded her the opportunity to orchestrate the massive money-laundering schemes now found throughout the country via Internet people-search databases. Though her career preceded the advent of the Internet, she easily could have participated with the computer technology then available to the CIA. Hawaii was the perfect location for such activities.

Particularly revealing in the toasting of Dunham's banking career, the speaker described his first day of work, having been handed a file and told, "You're a college grad. Go close this." That statement alone proves that Madelyn Dunham was more than an escrow agent and was actively involved in brokering real estate mortgages -- an apparent "conflict of interest."

What we now have is an accurate assessment of "Toot" Dunham's professional business personality — a complete contradiction of the portrait painted by her "grandson," Barack Obama, Jr. in his previous autobiographical spin. What we had also lacked was a specific description of her banking/real estate/CIA-Abwehr counterintelligence role.

Reports, during the weekend prior to the November 4, 2008 presidential election, that Madelyn Lee (Payne) Dunham had "died from cancer" were obviously created to divert attention from Obama's "Certificate-of-Live-Birth" woes. The ruse gave him an excuse for being in Hawaii so he and his damage-control team could suppress the evidence that no certificate actually exists. Madelyn's role in the money laundering of bogus real estate transactions is too important in the overall equation. The inevitable demand for DNA testing could be quelled by turning her into yet another "spook." This scenario is a carbon copy of her "daughter's death from cancer in 1995."

Old friends die hard
The Dunhams' connection to Oklahoma City and their covert real estate activities found a home in Warr Acres, OK, where Stanley Ann attended kindergarten. A company that was heavily involved in national and international real estate "development" and social programs, Warr Industries, went on to become Praxis Development in modern times. Today, Praxis represents many high-profile clients, of which one is Popeye's Chicken and Biscuits. The reader will recall the hidden real estate associations discovered in "The Three Stooges go to Washington,Part 4," (The Idaho Observer). It is significant that these relationships involved members of the German Abwehr, otherwise known as the Dachau, DVD.

It is no coincidence that these dots can be connected, especially considering the rebirth of the Nazi party through its relocation to Oklahoma City, OK. Again, their is another connection to Oklahoma Baptist University, where Admiral Wilhelm Canaris (aka Professor Samuel Randall Pittmann) taught law, courtesy of Operation Paperclip. The heir to the Warr Industries fortune recently attended the universityl that offered Canaris asylum through ODESSA -- and the unique opportunity to work for the CIA, who paid for his university residence at 426 West Midland Street, Shawnee, OK.

Obama's Selective Service Registration raises more doubts
In the ongoing saga of Barack Obama Jr.'s fraudulent Certificate of Live Birth, additional forged and altered documents have appeared. Through an FOIA document request, a retired federal agent has obtained Obama's Selective Service Registration card and its accompanying DLN printout sheet. The former agent, Stephen Coffman, points out that the Selective Service System Data Management Center's FOIA response was fulfilled prior to his actual request. The dates on the documents do not follow any logical sequence, nor do they match the dates when Coffman brought these issues to the attention of Selective Service officials.

Again, the public has been given two additional representations of fraud and forgery in two "official" documents. Coffman retired after more than 32 years of government service, his last position having been the "Resident Agent in Charge of Immigration and Customs Enforcement" (ICE) at the Galveston, TX office. As referenced by radio talk show host, columnist, and attorney Debbie Schlussel, Coffman held a "Secret or higher security clearance for the majority of those years."

According to a column posted by Schlussel at her web site, http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/columns/, Obama's "1980" registration for Selective Service is replete with discrepancies. Having studied the document, this author agrees that it is a forgery, along the card's postal stamp, tracking document, and its "DLN" (document location number). The SSR form was "filed" by Obama a few days prior to his 19th birthday, outside of the normal 6-month "grace period." Dated "July 30, 1980" (in Obama's handwriting), the card contains a postal stamp dated "July 29, 1980." Use of that postal stamp was discontinued in 1970, so the "postal stamp" is also fraudulent. Other anomalies exist, and the reader is encouraged to visit the above-referenced link to view the documents in their entirety.

Conclusions
The absolute arrogance of the conspirators behind this fiction called "Barack Hussein Muhammed Obama, Jr." is exactly the "change" the dumbed-down masses were so slyly promised. Obama's selections for his cabinet are nothing but representations of the "same ol' dirt." Despite the overwhelming preponderance of documented — and undocumented — evidence of fraud, forgery, deceit, and corruption now surfacing (incredibly) in the mainstream media, these people feel confident that they are beyond reproach.

Simply stated, if Obama was able to produce at least one genuine document, he would have. His handlers, the original "Architects of Darkness," created this mess in the first place. Their lies and their deceit have all but consumed anything good that remains in the world.

What does concern me (and others who have studied my research) is that it is much easier to tell the truth. The conclusions at which I have arrived are unique — even controversial — especially for his political supporters. The realizations which support this research, and that of others, is compelling and paints an entirely different picture than the one painted by the mainstream media. The media has never really been interested in discovering and reporting the truth. Their interests lie within the realm of profit and how they can maintain their lofty public personas as they brainwash, hoodwink, and propagandize the masses on behalf of their puppet masters.

What sinister sacrifice did a 56-day-old Maryland baby make on December 25, 2004? Who were her parents, and why has a "life trust" in her (alias) name, "Renee L. Abena Bama" (Life Estate), a "Linda B. Hartooka," and "Brian Bama" been assigned to a condominium in S.E. Florida? Will she ever haunt the halls of 10591 E. Clairmont Circle, Unit 111, Tamarac, FL 33321, or had she first awaited the property's October, 2007 closing date?

And if Baby Renee could tell us her thoughts, what would she say about her untimely (but obviously pre-planned) passing? The sacrificial death of "Renee L. Abena Obama" must be investigated, as should the suspicious deaths, in 2007, of three former members of Chicago's Trinity United Church of Christ. The trails to these four deaths are there. I wonder, "Who in law enforcement has the courage to launch an official investigation? Will anyone finally decide to take the high road and do his/her duty?"

I also wonder for whom little Renee might have cast her vote — knowing what she now knows.

© Don Nicoloff, 2008

The Three Stooges go to Washington, Part 4 Barack Hussein Obama, Jr.: The Real Story

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:32:31 -0400

By Don Nicoloff

BHO’s autobiography, in light of the foregoing revelations, is another fraud being perpetrated on the whole world. How could he be so wrong about so many "facts" in his personal life and historical accounts of his ancestral "roots?"

To date, BHO has been unable to produce a valid birth certificate. The "Certificate of Live Birth" from the state of Hawaii he produced for his presidential campaign has been determined to be "a horrible forgery" that lacks the proper state seal, signatures, certification number and contains several other anomalies that cast serious doubt on the authenticity of the document. BHO cannot, therefore, prove August 4, 1961, as his date of birth nor the state of Hawaii as his birthplace. So where—and when—was he born?

Pictured above is an image of the “certificate of live birth” the BHO campaign has offered as “proof” that
the Democrat nominee for president was born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961. Forensic analysis has demon-
strated the document to be a forgery on several points.

Genetic traits
One might find several clues in BHO’s appearance. BHO may resemble his "mother" or "father" if one stretches his imagination but there are aspects of his physical appearance that call his parentage into question.

Americans are familiar with the progression of numerous black generations who first arrived as slaves. Some interbred with whites, Hispanics, or other races with lighter skin, though they continued to produce offspring with dark complexions. Black genes are dominant and typically several interracial encounters are required before lighter-skinned offspring are produced.

BHO’s complexion does appear to be unusually light, considering he is "the first offspring" produced between a black man and a white woman. As "politically incorrect" as it may be, this is a scientifically valid observation. BHO’s "parents" were also of average or below-average height though he turned out to be over six feet tall.

That BHO turned out to be so tall and light-skinned, considering his alleged parentage and alleged grandparentage is, genetically speaking, curious.

At right is a photo previously published by Chicago
Sun Times in 2007, “courtesy of the Obama family.”

(L-R front row) are “half-sister Auma, her mother
Kezia, step-grandmother Sarah Hussein Onyango
Obama, and unknown. (Back row L-R) are “unknown,
Barack Hussein Muhammed Obama, Jr., half-brother
Abongo (Roy) Obama, and three more unknowns.”

It is ironic that the “Obama family” did not identify
all persons in this photo. One might question if any
are the children of Obama, Sr.’s “third wife,” Ruth
Nidesand (not pictured) , a white American woman.
If so, then one of the four ‘unknowns’ might have
been “David Obama,” who Barack, Jr. claims to
have never met. Kezia intimated that Barack visited
Kenya in 1985, when David was still alive, which is
in direct conflict with Barack’s claim that his first
visit occurred after David’s death in 1987. Obama’s
other ‘half-brother’ Mark, if in this same photo, would
cause others to question why his complexion is so
much darker than Barack’s.

One characteristic which cannot be attributed to his black Kenyan "father" or his white American "mother" is the color of his lips. BHO carries a trait unique to those born in southeast Asia, certain parts of the Middle East and northern Africa and is only visible in color photos and videos. Obama’s lips have a purple hue common to those born in the Philippines, Malaysia, Indonesia and in some Arab countries. It is a feature not found in black Africans, nor in African-Americans, yet BHO has it (Recall that the "Obama" name is also of Indonesian origin).

Regiment of Netherlands East Indies forces in 1943—Anyone of these
soldiers or his relatives could be the father of BHO. Why not?

[Note: Journalist Kenneth Lamb, upon digging deeper into an article by Richard Cohen published in The Washington Post, claims that BHO is descended from Arab slave traders who settled in Kenya. His research shows that Obama, Sr., had one black African maternal grandfather and the rest of his genealogy is Arabic.

So, Lamb reasons, Obama is 50 percent white on his mother’s side and 43.75 percent Arabic on his father’s side. That means Obama’s genetic makeup is only 6.25 percent black African.
In order to legally qualify as a “minority,” the government requires that one’s genealogy contain one-eighth, (or 12.5 percent) of that specific minority.

According to Lamb, Obama’s claim that he would be the first “black” president is not legally defensible].

The Indonesia years?
Considering the "Obama" name is Maluku in origin and his physical traits, BHO was likely born in Papua, New Guinea—not Hawaii. South Molucca, like the greater part of Indonesia, had been under Dutch control for centuries. Larry Martin, an "expatriate" who has lived in Southeast Asia for more than 20 years, published an article on January 20, 2007, at his Internet blog site: http://laotze.blogspot.com, "An American Expat in Southeast Asia." Martin's article, "Tracking Down Obama in Indonesia," quotes the findings of "Detikcom," an international online news source:

During this short period of time [when Obama was supposed to have lived in Indonesia (1967-71 or 1968-73) depending on who's telling the story], Barack was believed to have lived in a house on Dempo Street near Amir Hamzah Park and the city center of Jakarta. However, currently the occupants of the house and the residents in this area have never heard of either Barack or Barry.

Tracking down the past of [a] U.S. senator in Indonesia is quite difficult. The only quite strong information Detikcom was able to obtain was from a[n] Onny Padmo, Barry’s classmate in class 4 of Besuki primary school, Menteng, Jakarta near the city center around 1971.

Onny admitted to attending Barry’s birthday party at his house at that time. Barry’s house was supposedly on Dempo Street near Amir Hamzah Park. But, Onny didn’t quite seem to remember the exact address. As you know, that was over 35 years ago.

Detikcom investigated the area on Monday (3/7/2006). However, several residents who have lived in this area for quite a long time had never heard of the Barack name or Barry. They had also never heard of the Lolo Soetoro name, Ann Dunham, or Maya Kassandra Soetoro.

In fact Barry, together with his mother and his stepfather, lived in Indonesia for quite a long time. Apparently Barry went to Primary School here for only one year in Primary 4, but the information from Maya Soetoro is that Barry had lived in Indonesia between the years of 1968-1973. However, the exact location of Barry’s house for five years remains unclear.

"The only thing that is certain," according to Onny, "is that ‘Barry’ lived on Dempo Street."

"I had previously attended Barry’s birthday party in the house, not far from Amir Hamzah Park," said Onny, Barry’s school friend from 1971.

At the time, Dempo Street was still being worked on. It was just off Amir Hamzah Park although not right in front. The road closer to the mosque at that time was quite famous. One of the residents who had lived a long time in the Amir Hamzah Park are, Ari (aged 55), when being questioned by Detikcom, claimed to have never heard of a Barack, Obama, or Barry. He had also never heard of a person named Lolo Soetoro. "As I remember in the 1960s many Dutch lived near this area. If there was a Negroid child, I would have known," said Ari, who added, "Apart from Dutch, though, in this area there also lived many descendents of the Dutch Ambonese."

Haji Mamiati, who had lived in the area since the 1950s also admitted to not knowing of an Ann Dunham, Lolo Soetoro or Barry. He claimed that in the Amir Mamzah Park area, during the 1960s there were many foreigners. Mamiati thought that he had indeed seen a black negro child who had curly hair who lived in No. 2 Dempo Street sometime around the 1970s. However, he said the negroid child was claimed to have been from Papua. "Indeed there was a negroid child, but they claimed that the child was from Irian [or West Papua, a province in eastern Indonesia]," said Maniati."

Obviously, the residents of Jakarta did not recall the "Soetoro family," nor Barack Obama. The evidence suggests that if Obama was in Indonesia for any length of time, it was for a birthday party at a house no one can find today and for only part of one school year.

Maya Soetoro, BHO’s half sister, is on record as claiming that BHO lived with Stanley Ann and Soetoro in Indonesia from 1968 to 1973 and that he lived there from 1968-1974. We now have BHO living in Indonesia from either 1967-1971; 1967-1972; 1968-1973 and; 1968-1974.

Thus far we have established that there is no part of BHO’s life story from his alleged birth in 1961 until 1971 (or 1972, 1973 and 1974) that can be proved through documents or anecdotes.

The vagaries continue. Like Barack Obama, Sr., BHO’s education was beyond his family’s visible financial means, so who paid for it? Most likely, the Rockefellers. They could have easily funneled his tuition into a Bank of Hawaii account set up by its VP, Madelyn Dunham, BHO’s maternal grandmother (Remember that Madelyn Dunham’s father worked for the Rockefeller’s Standard Oil Co).

College years
The official story states that BHO began his college career at Occidental College in Los Angeles. Why would young BHO choose to attend classes at Occidental? Why wouldn’t BHO enroll at the University of Hawaii where both of his alleged parents were "alumni" and where he had lived (since the Christmas holidays in 1971) when he returned to Hawaii with his mother to live with his grandparents (Stanley Armour and Madelyn Dunham) until graduating high school?

Photo of BHO allegedly taken during
his years at Occidental college in Los
Angeles.

Occidental is known as a liberal arts college, ranking 36th nationally in 2008 and having a "rising star quality," the same phraseology used by the media when describing Obama’s sudden "rise in popularity" and his "star-like qualities." Occidental also sponsors student foreign-exchange programs affiliated with the UN. BHO likely did not choose Occidental; Occidental was chosen for him.

After two years at Occidental, BHO transferred to Columbia University in New York and graduated in 1983 with a BA in Political Science, concentrating in "International Relations." Despite having previously received "scholarships" and "financial aid from his grandparents," Obama spent his first night in New York "sleeping in an alley near the corner of 109th and Amsterdam Avenue" and "washing with the homeless next to an open fire hydrant," according to www.wikicu.com, the Columbia University "wiki encyclopedia."

Also according to wikicu.com, BHO chose not to live on campus, moving "into a walkup on E. 94th St., in East Harlem, where he would "chat with his Puerto Rican neighbors about...the sound of gunfire at night.

"Obama's professors and classmates, including former international politics professor Michael Baron and current MTV president Michael Wolf, confirm that he was a brilliant, standout student and that he was an active participant in seminars. Baron said he was one of the top one or two students in his class.

"Despite this, Obama continually declines requests to release his Columbia transcript."

Though there has been significant discussion as to whether Obama's senior thesis was about "Soviet nuclear disarmament" or the "North-South debate on trade and the new international economic order," he did not write an official thesis at all. The paper, written for Professor Baron's American Foreign Policy class, was only a "long seminar paper." Baron "claims to have lost his copy of the paper in a move sometime ago."

And though BHO has written about "racial slurs" inscribed on campus walls and bathroom stalls at Columbia University, former students do not recall seeing them, nor do they recall seeing BHO. Perhaps Zbigniew Brzezinski, former Columbia University Professor from 1960-1989—and BHO’s current foreign policy advisor—could shed some light on both issues.

After leaving Columbia in 1983, BHO remained in New York for four years then moved to Chicago. During his New York and Chicago years, BHO was predominately employed by a succession of community action organizations until he began attending Harvard Law School in 1988 and was elected the first "black" president of the Harvard Law Review in 1990. BHO graduated magna cum laude with a Harvard law degree in 1991.

Outstanding parking tickets. On a more dubious note, Obama also became adept at collecting parking tickets in Somerville, MA. BHO avoided paying the fines for over 19 years. They were only paid in 2007 after he announced his candidacy to run for president.

According to George P. Hassett, Senior Editor of the Somerville News, "Before Barack Obama was a United States senator and a presidential hopeful, he was a Harvard University law student living in Somerville who parked in bus stops and accumulated hundreds of dollars in parking tickets. And, for nearly two decades, those parking tickets went unpaid until a representative of Obama’s settled all his outstanding debts with Cambridge’s Traffic, Parking and Transportation Department Jan. 26 [2007]…"

During his time at Harvard, BHO lived at 366 Broadway in Somerville, according to his parking tickets. Records from the Cambridge Traffic, Parking and Transportation office show that between Oct. 5, 1988 and Jan. 12, 1990, BHO was cited for 17 traffic violations, sometimes receiving two in the same day. The violations included parking in a resident permit area, parking in a bus stop and failing to pay the meter. Twelve of BHO’s 17 tickets were given to him on Massachusetts Avenue. In one eight-day stretch in 1988, BHO was cited seven times for parking violations and was fined $45. Thirteen of the 17 violations occurred within one month in 1988.

BHO’s disobedience of the rules of the road earned him $140 in fines from the City of Cambridge. The tickets went unpaid for over 19 years and $260 in late fees were added to the tab. On Jan. 26. the fines and late fees were paid in full. The final tally for Obama’s parking breaches was $400, according to Cambridge Traffic, Parking and Transportation.

Obama spokeswoman Jennifer Psaki said the presidential candidate’s parking violations were not relevant. "He didn’t owe that much and what he did owe, he paid…Many people have parking tickets and late fees. All the parking tickets were paid in full," Psaki said.

Most ordinary Americans are treated differently when parking tickets are not paid. The collection process commonly results in "offenders" being tracked down and forced to pay outstanding traffic tickets, including court costs; nonpayment of parking tickets can also result in suspension of driving "privileges," jail, wage garnishments, liens and/or foreclosures on real property. Why was BHO allowed to avoid paying those fines for more than 19 years despite his notoriety as a U.S. senator? What gives him immunity from the very laws he helps create?

Substance abuse and allegations of homosexuality
There is little disclosure, if any, by the media about BHO’s substance abuse issues, though he has admitted using marijuana and cocaine while in college. The wikicu.com website even states in reference to BHO’s two years at Occidental, "… Obama had been into partying and drugs" and that he hoped the move to New York and Columbia would "…put him on a more serious track."

Claims that BHO is currently a substance-abusing homosexual surfaced in March, 2008. Larry Sinclair, an open homosexual, claims that he met BHO in 1999 at an Illinois nightclub, drank Scotch with BHO and snorted cocaine while "Obama smoked crack cocaine" and engaged in sex with the then Illinois state senator in the back of a "Five Star" limousine.

According to Sinclair, the limousine driver, who Sinclair identified as "Pramjit Multani," introduced him to BHO.

Sinclair disavowed knowing that BHO was a political figure at the time and related another encounter when BHO appeared at Sinclair’s Comfort Inn and Suites, Gurnee, IL hotel room on November 6th and 7th, 1999, drugs in tow. On this occasion, Sinclair claimed he not only engaged in sexual relations with Obama, but with his limousine driver as well.

Murder at TUCC. Sinclair’s allegations are supported by a series of events that took place at Chicago’s Trinity United Church of Christ (TUCC).

Donald Young was the openly gay music director of
TUCC who was found murdered in his home with a
bullet to the back of his head on Dec. 23, 2007. Two
other openly gay TUCC men died under suspicious
circumstances in the same time period.

On Dec. 23, 2007, Donald Young died from multiple gunshot wounds, including at least one delivered "execution style" to the back of his head. Young was the openly gay, ordained deacon, church officer and music director at TUCC—the church BHO had attended for many years.

Sinclair claims that Young had a similar relationship to BHO and that Young had likely communicated his "jealous displeasure" about BHO's fling with Sinclair and paid for it with his life. Sinclair also charges that Obama gave Young his phone numbers to inquire if Sinclair revealed these secrets to anyone else.

Coincidentally, another openly-gay member of the church, Larry Bland, had been found shot to death in his home a month earlier, on November 17, 2007 at 8:40 a.m. The Chicago Police Department is currently investigating both deaths as murder cases.

Nate Spencer, a third homosexual TUCC congregant, was pronounced dead of "natural causes," on December 26, 2007 at 6:31 a.m. The "natural causes" noted on a copy of the death certificate published online by Sinclair were "septicemia, pneumonia, and HIV."

Rumors abound that Spencer's death was also due to gunshot wounds to the back of the head. However, Sinclair maintains that those rumors are untrue and offered the above-mentioned death certificate as proof.

Sinclair has also raised an extremely important question: "How is it that the Reverend Jeremiah Wright knew of Donald Young's death before it was officially declared by the medical examiner at 12:10 p.m. that Sunday afternoon?"

Members of the TUCC congregation report that they first learned that Young had been killed when Wright announced the death to the congregation(s) at either (or both) the 7:30 a.m. and 11:00 a.m. Sunday services, prior to Young having been officially declared dead.

On May 31, 2008, BHO left the church he claims to have attended for "more than 20 years."

National Press Club. In a June 18, 2008 press conference before the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., Sinclair fielded questions about his allegations and admitted that he had served prison sentences for committing fraud. At the conclusion of the conference, Sinclair was taken into custody by Washington, D.C., police executing "outstanding arrest warrants" from Colorado and Delaware.

Truth or consequences. It was obvious to those who had been following Sinclair’s Internet blog and radio interviews that he was causing major damage to BHO’s campaign and had to be stopped. On all accounts, Sinclair appears to be steadfast in his appeal that BHO "finally come clean and tell the truth."

Reverse speech analysis of Larry Sinclair’s numerous sound bites, both from radio interviews and the press conference, show that he is being truthful. The new science has demonstrated instances where politicians (and those under criminal indictment) have lied. Though this emerging technology is still controversial, reverse speech analysis has been demonstrated to be more revealing than the standard polygraph tests administered by law enforcement agencies across the country. Sinclair even accuses Obama of "arranging a rigged polygraph examination" intended to discredit him.

Larry Sinclair, who claims to have “partied” with BHO several times beginning in 1999
is pictured here while taking a polygraph last March. Though he reportedly failed the
polygraph, there are several other powerful indications that Sinclair is telling the truth.

Larry Sinclair also charges that there exists a link between Delaware Attorney General Beau Biden's false charges against him (for which he was arrested and then exonerated) and the subsequent selection of his father, Senator Joseph Biden, as BHO's vice-presidential running mate. One good turn deserves another.

Chicago Tribune. Sinclair’s charges of recent BHO drug use are further supported by public disclosures that BHO’s former high school friend, Keith Kakugawa, a convicted drug felon, contacted his campaign headquarters, implying he needed cash. BHO, according to Kakugawa's interview with The Chicago Tribune, March 29, 2008, urged his "old friend" to avoid publicity by asserting, "Hey, I'd rather you not talk to reporters."

It is assumed that someone in the Obama campaign likely arranged the funds necessary to encourage his silence, though campaign officials admit they only "offered to call social service agencies" on Kakugawa's behalf. Kakugawa's criminal record includes multiple (four) convictions for possession of cocaine, two for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute and auto theft. In the interview, Kakugawa denied that he attempted to extort money from the Obama campaign.

Rev. Jeremiah Wright. As these alarming developments were unfolding, the mainstream media diverted America’s attention on the Rev. Jeremiah Wright of Chicago’s 10,000-member TUCC "megachurch." Wright’s controversial sermons about whites, HIV/Aids and the "plight of unwed mothers" were all over the news last March. While these are all valid issues, the media "spun" them out of context. By loudly directing America’s attention to Rev. Wright, who had little or nothing to do with BHO’s campaign, quieter claims of BHO’s drug abuse, homosexuality and homicide by Sinclair and others were effectively silenced.

Wright retired in Feb., 2008, at age 66 after 36 years as the pastor at TUCC.

BHO’s attendance at TUCC. BHO claims (in his 2006 autobiography "The Audacity of Hope") that he "joined Trinity United Church of Christ because he did not necessarily have to be a believer." He claimed he was baptized shortly before his 30th birthday, or sometime in 1991-92 and that he had attended the church for "over 20 years" by the time he stopped attending on May 31, 2008.

Ayana Karanja, Ph.D., a professor of anthropology and sociology and director of the Black World Studies Department at Loyola University, Chicago, claims she was an established member of TUCC when Obama joined the church in 1985. Other accounts state that BHO joined TUCC after moving to Chicago in 1987. BHO claims he began attending TUCC in 1988 and was formally baptized into the church shortly before his 30th birthday in 1991.Which account is accurate?

Pictured above with BHO are his maternal grandparents Stanley Armour and Madelyn Lee Dunham. The photo was taken in Central Park South, New York City, allegedly upon BHO’s graduation from Columbia University in 1983. The photo, however, shows trees with leaves—some of them are turning—suggesting that it was taken in early fall. Curiously, on BHO’s left hand is a wedding ring. Close inspection of the photo reveals that the wedding ring has a particular shape identical to the wedding ring BHO is wearing in the recent photo below. Unless BHO was married to some otherwise undisclosed person in fall, 1983, this photo would have been taken after BHO’s marriage to Michelle on October 18, 1992. Stanley allegedly died on February 8, 1992. So the photo was either taken after Stanley had allegedly died and after BHO married Michelle or BHO was married to someone else when he graduated from Columbia—in fall, 1983.

Barack Obama, Jr. (left) wearing the same wedding band as in the above photo with his grandparents.

There is no reason to conclude that Obama (nor any other man) would be wearing a wedding ring, unless he was already married. One may assume that Obama was not attempting to hide that fact when either one of these photos was taken.

Aliases
Since other members of the "Dunham-Obama" clan have aliases, the author assumed BHO has them, too. While querying "Barack Obama" in various people search databases on the Internet, one can easily find BHO’s addresses and phone numbers. However, in one obscure, yet phenomenally "insightful" database, there are no records for BHO (additional queries show that the names and records of many controversial public officials are also conspicuously absent). Suspecting a coverup, I began querying names associated with BHO. When the name "David Obama" was queried, it was like hitting the alias jackpot. "David Obama," was BHO’s alleged younger half-brother who reportedly "died in a motorcycle accident in 1987," before BHO had the opportunity to meet him.

The story is contradicted by Kezia, who casually mentioned Barack's "1985 visit to Kenya" in her Mail Online interview—yet another anomaly in BHO's justifiably disputable chronology of life events.

David [Edjoa] Obama’s name, at least, lives on.

Under David Obama comes the list of possible aliases: David O. Edjoa, David Edlavitch, David E. Obama and David Obama-Edjoa.

A Google search on David Edlavitch reveals a realtor named "David A. Edlavitch" who lives in Maryland and works as a foreclosure and post-sale agent for Bierman, Geesing & Ward, LLC, a law firm that specializes in providing "…legal representation in Maryland, Virginia and the District of Columbia to mortgage lenders, mortgage servicers, banks and other financial institutions."

Among those listed as possible relatives and associates are Edjoa D. Obama, Joseph Bama, Mildred Bama, Jana Hallman Bama, Josepha Edjoaeyombo and Paul N. Bama.

Upon running the names above through the same database we discover a bottomless rabbit hole that begins with BHO’s long-dead half-brother. We also discover that, among the names of possible aliases, relatives and associates, the only name that does not cross reference back to the other names is "David Obama." This is a very strange anomaly since the entire search began by querying David Obama.

Down the rabbit hole
Recall that the "Obama" name was derived from two words, "O" and "Bama" in the Maluku language of New Guinea. The "Bama" names appearing as possible aliases/relatives and associates are an interesting jumble of names arising from the original query of David Obama. When one starts following leads associated with these names, it’s "back down the rabbit hole we go."

For instance, "Paul N. Bama (PNB)" and "Maxine D. Francis (MDF)" are co-owners of a house at 3432 Canberra St., Silver Spring, MD. The house was purchased in January or February, 2005, from "David Oliyide and C. Oliyide" for $390,000. "David Oliyide-Bailey," (his full name) is an employee of Potomac Electrical Power Company (Pepco) and C. Oliyide (Christina A.) is a graduate of M.I.T. No crime here, but why the obfuscation of their real names on the property titles?

PNB and MDF do not live at the Canberra St. house; it was, as of May, 2008, rented to a woman named "Raquel Jennings."

According to ModelMayhem.com, an Internet blog site where photographers and models discuss portfolios, screen tests, nude modeling, and "breaking into the modeling business," the bloggers were suspicious of a company called "Classic Modeling Agency" which charged aspiring models $149 to publish their "portfolios" on the Internet—something anyone could do for free (or a small fee)—and has not fulfilled web certification requirements.

In her own post, "Raquel" solicited photographers and models for "Classic Modeling Agency." The email address that once accompanied her post, "raquel@billhillrealtor.com" has suddenly disappeared. Not only was "Raquel’s" email address abandoned, but her telephone number was recently disconnected. The house is still lived in and, as of August, 2008, has a "new" tenant and a new phone number for a "Carol R. Jennings."

Searches reveal that Carol either works for an Internet Hosting company, Third Party Software Systems, Inc., of Silver Spring, MD, or as an attorney for the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)—or both.

The registrant of Classic Modeling Agency’s web site URL, "classicmodelingagency.com" is a web site graphic designer with addresses in Columbus, OH and Chicago, IL. The designer’s own web page leads one back into a maze of doctors, medical clinics and other ventures, returning to more aliases, more properties and more obfuscation.

Another posting from "Nick Soren" the "president" of Classic Modeling Agency promised to file a lawsuit against the bloggers at the ModelMayhem site.

The name "Nick Soren" is also fictitious. His real name is "Soren Hansen," age 26, who lives in Nørresundby, Denmark and his Internet Relay Chat (IRC) name is "Nick: soren." Hansen, as his alter-ego "Soren," describes himself "as a 42-year-old man with a wife of 22 years and two daughters who surf the Internet frequently...."

Hansen is featured on several sites as an Ubuntu Core Developer "working on ebox and Ubuntu Server."

Taking offense to a blogger’s remark that the owner of Classic Modeling Agency might be "a horny guy in his apartment," Hansen suggests, "The slightest research or a quick e-mail or phone call to any of my staff would have made clear.…that our culture is completely at odds with the image painted by that remark."

The author did attempt to call and email Raquel Jennings, but both her email and phone number were expired, as was "Nick Soren’s" Classic Modeling Agency web site.

So, we now have two individuals, "Raquel Jennings" (aka Carol R. Jennings) and "Nick Soren" (aka Soren Hansen) affiliated with Classic Modeling Agency, which appears to have been a scam operated, at least in part, out of the home owned by "Paul A. Bama" and "Maxine D. Francis." To further complicate matters, Google the name "Maxine Franas" (a Maxine D. Francis alias) and see what happens. Google will ask, "Did you mean Maxine Francis?"

How (or why) would Google associate the Franas alias to the Francis name?

Paul N. Bama and Maxine D. Francis own other properties in the Silver Spring and Hyattsville, MD areas, each having disconnected phone numbers and current tenants with African, Arabic, Israeli, and Hispanic names. One of those addresses even houses an ambulatory service company which operates in Washington, D.C.

Following these names/aliases leads to another labyrinth of medical clinics, hospitals, fast-food franchises, medical suppliers and pharmaceutical companies. It appears from the records that "Maxine D. Francis" alternately uses middle initials "A.," and "B," which reveal some interesting real estate holdings in Miami, Florida, including houses, apartment complexes, office buildings, and food service/manufacturing companies.

Returning to Paul N. Bama’s "relative/associates" list we find that the sheer number of addresses, relatives and associates to be staggering. Previous locations for Paul N. Bama include references to 99 in Carrboro, NC, 32 in Hillsborough, NC, 10 in Chapel Hill, NC, 10 in Mocksville, NC, 5 in Winston Salem, NC; 28 more locations are indicated in 19 other cities. Simple arithmetic reveals a staggering total of 184 addresses, 159 relatives and 386 phone numbers under one alias which connects repeatedly to thousands of other aliases, over and over again—all of which began by querying the name "David Obama."

And in one more attempt to muddy the waters of obfuscation, Paul N. Bama authored a solitary blog post on an Internet news site, "Topix," (www.topix.com/), entry #180 of its forum on page 9, in response to the following headline on July 19, 2007:

U.S. Marine convicted in Iraqi grandfather's death
SAN DIEGO - A military jury found a U.S. Marine guilty on Wednesday for conspiring to kidnap and kill an Iraqi grandfather nabbed from his home and shot dead in the middle of the night last year. Cpl. Trent ...

"For anyone who has served we know what this is. After every incident an investigation must be conducted. This is a case of some stupid, punk, JAG kid, fresh out of college trying to make a name for himself and get promoted. As always at the expense of someone who would be responsible for saving his ass if he were actually in country. What can be done the troops are damned if they do and damned if they don't. Bush is an idiot but you can blame him he was born that way; congress is at fault for letting him steal the first election." ... Paul N. Bama, Greenville, AL

Paul N. Bama is not listed anywhere on any database as living in "Greenville, AL," though this occasion served as an opportunity to blend a political statement with a little "male bonding." The web site seems to be frequented exclusively by men.

Renee L. Abena Obama. The most shocking discovery about BHO was hidden within David Obama’s "relatives" list and it casts a very, very dark occultic shadow on BHO. The name "Renee Abena Obama" appeared. Who is Renee Abena Obama? Actually, the proper question is, "Who was Renee L. Abena Obama?" An exhaustive search revealed the birth of a baby girl named Renee L. Abena Obama on October 31, 2004. The infant died less than two months later on December 25, 2004.

Young infants frequently die from congenital complications, though the death was not reported by any hospital in the State of Maryland, but by a funeral home (indicated by the SSDI code "72").

BHO’s biographies do not report the death of an infant in 2004, yet here was a baby girl who bore his last name—and the initial of his grandmother’s middle name—Madelyn "Lee" Dunham. A search of the Social Security Death Index produced "No Results," though a genealogical index at WorldVitalRecords.com produced a Social Security number: "215-71-0752."

Entering the number directly into a search revealed its owner:
Name: Renee L Abena Obama
Birth Date: 31 October 2004 (Historical Events)
Death Date: 25 December 2004 (Historical Events)
Issuing State: Maryland
SSN: 215-71-0752

A subsequent review of birth and death dates of the Dunham family revealed a startling coincidence—Ralph Waldo Emerson Dunham (BHO’s maternal great-grandfather) was born on December 25, 1894—exactly 110 years before Renee’s death. Renee was born under strange circumstances. Her death at age two months was strangely reported with almost no details memorialized in the public record. Therefore, we have the "authority" to speculate on the significance of Baby Renee L. Abena Obama’s short life.

The Illuminati has a penchant for Satanic rituals with numerological significance. The 110-year time period represents the number "11," a powerfully mystical number symbolizing "one greater than God." In short, Dunham’s birth December 25, 1894, marked the beginning and Renee’s Dec. 25, 2004 death marked the end. Renee Obama also lived a total of 56 days. Adding (5+6) produces another "11."

This baby’s death had all the earmarks of a Satanic sacrifice. That day could have marked Barack Obama’s full submission to the authority of the Illuminati.

There were no significant worldwide events on October 31, 2004, other than the modern celebration of the pagan "All Hallows Eve." Of course, December 25th represents the pagan birthdate celebration of Christ, so that date (the number of days the baby lived and Dunham’s birthday) were all occultically significant.

The following day, December 26, 2004, was a significant day for the whole world. A tsunami struck Indonesia, killing 146,000 people. The numerology on this published death toll is, again, "11" (1+4+6). The "11:11" derived from the two sequential events (the ritual sacrifice of a 2-month-old baby and the 146,000 victims of the tsunami) also symbolizes a new beginning.

Renee L. Abena Obama’s death should also mark the beginning of another event—a murder investigation.

BHO and Kenyan politics
BHO and an email from two American missionaries who spent 12 years in Kenya details Obama’s role in funding Raila Amollo Odinga’s attempted overthrow of the Kenyan government. BHO’s second middle name,"Muhammed," is revealed, along with his $1 million "contribution" to Odinga’s campaign. In August, 2006, BHO toured Kenya and spoke in favor of Odinga’s candidacy at several rallies.

The missionaries report that escalated violence (promoted by Odinga’s methods) resulted in the deaths of "hundreds of thousands" of Kenyans.

Odinga, like so many other politicians around the world, claims he is a cousin of BHO. Odinga’s "election" as prime minister is being challenged, though he, himself, is charging "fraud."

[Note: Author Jerome Corsi of WorldNetDaily was recently taken into custody by Kenyan authorities after conducting additional research on for his bestselling book "Obamanation." Corsi was reportedly arrested after announcing he was going to hold a press conference in Kenya to make public what his research uncovered about Obama and his relationship to Raila Odinga. After his arrest, Corsi was held in an immigration detention facility for a few days and then put back on an airplane to London Oct. 13, 2008. Corsi was not able to hold a press conference in Kenya regarding Obama's ties to Odinga—ties that prove that Obama is a staunch supporter of the Odinga-led violence in Kenya mentioned above].

BHO and organized crime
Though the local Chicago media covered Barack Obama’s ties to organized crime, particularly in the case of Syrian-born real estate developer Antoin "Tony" Rezko’s $1.6 million payment for the lot adjacent to Obama’s new $2 million home, Obama has been able to hide his corrupt financial interests, his ties to the UN, UNESCO, the FAO, the CFR, the CIA, the Israeli Mossad, APEC/ABAC, and their interests in the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, and "Non-Wood Forestry Products."

The author has discovered the truth about Barack Hussein Muhammed Obama and his cohorts, and has been notified that he is being "stalked" by UNESCO, through its La Habra, California IP address: 4.131.135./# (Level 3 Communications). The IP address leads to another organization, DATAMAT, with a head office that appears to be in Rome, Italy. Google the IP address for some interesting financial statements.

Conclusions
The evidence shows that BHO cannot prove who he, where he was born, who his true parents are or where he lived from birth to age 11 (or maybe 13). BHO’s accounts of his college years do not line up with facts and the only real record of his attendance is the trail of 20-year-past-due parking tickets paid after he announced his candidacy to run for president—and after the Somerville News reported the delinquency.

Since he began campaigning for the Democrat nomination for president, a broad, diverse array of organizations and individuals, some of them very credible, have charged BHO with racism, lack of experience, drug use, homosexuality and ties to radical Muslims and organized crime. We can include four murders (three at his "former" church), that are directly or indirectly associated with his recent personal or political history.

The nicest thing we can say is that the Democrats must be short on quality public servants for BHO to have made the final cut as his party’s mascot for the 2008 election. The truth is likely much more sinister.

We err when assuming our leaders are chosen by us through the electoral process; the mantra that "America is the freest country in the world and anyone can be president" is not true. To the contrary, our leaders are "created" from Illuminati bloodlines and their lives are scripted through convoluted stories and false documents—all of which is facilitated by incalculable wealth and political power. Obama’s recent denunciation of public campaign funding is a sign that he intends to continue business as usual, remaining unaccountable for his perversions, his crimes and those of his cohorts.

Ask any black man or woman if they truly discern that Barack Obama is an "African-American," and they will likely tell you he is far from the norm, both in appearance and demeanor. The anger he exudes is not born of American heritage, nor of American constitutional principles. He has yet to express himself from the heart, an event which is unlikely to ever occur.

The secret operative with aspirations to lead America into an uncertain future reprimands his followers (and outside observers) like the father he never had, with disdain for our discernment, our love of country and our common sense.

As is the case with many U.S. presidential hopefuls, Barack Obama’s ties are deep, though his personal roots are shallow. The political candidate "created out of thin air" has been exposed by the light of day. We can now hope for a stiff wind to carry him off into the sunset—as quickly as he rose to his status of idolized adulation. That is the sort of "change we all can believe in."

© Don Nicoloff, 2008